Sessions
Session 1
Main Session
The Cities that made the Empire: Connectivity and Urban Networks from Late Republican to Imperial Times
Organizers
- Noelia Cases Mora
Universität Hamburg - Borja Martín Chacón
independent researcher - Sabine Panzram
Alte Geschichte, Universität Hamburg
Keywords
civitates, Roman Republic, Roman Empire, urban netwoks
Synthesis
This session explores the role of urban networks in consolidating Roman hegemony from the Late Republic to the 2nd century AD. It assesses how Rome integrated, altered, or dismantled the various types of ties between city networks to strengthen control, highlighting the mechanisms that shaped urban connectivity within and beyond the Empire.
Presentation
Despite Rome’s clear intent to individualise its relationships with cities under its sphere of influence to consolidate its authority, the process of constituting its empire was built upon an overlapping network of cities interconnected through political, legal, economic, social, and religious ties. This session explores the role that these urban networks played in the process of developing and consolidating Rome’s dominance as the hegemonic power in the Mediterranean from the late Republic to the 2nd century AD.
Several key issues are proposed to guide the development of the panel. Namely, the ability to generate networks that irrevocably bound the city of Rome to the diverse urban realities under its influence, or conversely, Rome’s efforts to dismantle or restrict those deemed contrary to their interests and perceived as a threat. Furthermore, it is worth considering Rome’s ability to integrate into, modify, or reinterpret pre-existing urban networks whose potential benefits were identified as essential tools for facilitating its rule. Given the empire’s global reach, attention will also be paid to Rome’s necessary ability to manage and oversee autonomous urban networks beyond its own direct participation—both those within the Roman Empire itself and those extending beyond its borders, connecting the cities of the empire with realities beyond.
The scientific relevance of the session is evident if we recall the number, variety and importance of major research projects recently devoted to city networks in Antiquity. Among those, stands out the ERC funded project An empire of 2000 cities: urban networks and economic integration in the Roman Empire, directed by Prof. Lukas de Ligt (Leiden). This research has demonstrated the importance of a critical evaluation of Rome’s impact on preexisting urban networks, as an essential method to understand the broader implications of imperial expansion and governance.
This session aims to bring together an interdisciplinary collection of studies – based on literary sources, epigraphy, numismatics, archaeology, QGIS database – united by the multifaceted and temporally broad examination of the networks of cities that structured the Roman Empire. The panel seeks to establish a forum for exchange and discussion on the role that cities played in structuring and channelling Roman domination and to encourage comparisons between urban networks across different territories. It aims to contribute to broader reflections on the long-term impact of Roman urban connectivity on the spatial, political, and cultural configurations that have shaped Europe’s historical trajectory toward modernity.
Suggested topics:
Roman colonization and hegemony
Legal promotion and urban transformation
Rome and provincial cities: bonds, collaboration and dominance
Competition and inter-city cooperation
Religious urban networks
Economy and trade networks
Cities, mobility and social promotion
Land and maritime connectivity
Session 2
Main Session
Transportation Networks and Urban Organisation in the Roman Empire: Analysing the backbones of Rome
Organizers
- Pau de Soto
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Adam Pazout
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Clara Filet
Université Bordeaux-Montaigne, Institut Ausonius
Keywords
Roman Empire, transport, network, archaeology, urbanism
Synthesis
The Roman Empire was a vast pancontinental territory configured around network of cities. However, the creation, subsistence, and evolution of these population centres depended on a complex transportation network. This session will be focused on this transportation infrastructure and how it affected urban development in the Roman world.
Presentation
Session 3
Main Session
Between Institutions and Geography: Cities as Hubs of Medieval and Early Modern River Transport and Trade
Organizers
- Cornelis Marinus (Marco) in ‘t Veld
Tilburg University - Bart Holterman
Forschungsstelle für die Geschichte der Hanse und des Ostseeraums (FGHO) - Maurits den Hollander
Tilburg University
Keywords
rivers, urban institutions, geography, commerce, multilevel governance
Synthesis
This session explores how the geography of rivers interacted with urban governance and institutions in medieval and early modern commerce. Focusing on cooperation, competition, and legal exchange it highlights rivers as arenas of multi-level governance and invites global case studies on urban roles in riverine commercial systems.
Presentation
Session 4
Specialist Session
Mediterranean and Baltic Medieval Merchant and Urban Networks in contrast
Organizers
- Antoni Riera Melis
Universitat de Barcelona (UB) – Institut d’Estudis Catalans (IEC), Barcelona - Roser Salicrú i Lluch
Milà i Fontanals Institution (IMF) – Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), Barcelona - Tobias Boestad
La Rochelle Université / LIENSS - Louis Sicking
Leiden University
Keywords
rivers, urban institutions, geography, commerce, multilevel governance
Synthesis
Mediterranean-Baltic interconnection was one of the major achievements of medieval maritime trade, and contributed to the articulation of European markets. By promoting a compared reflection on the characteristics and evolution of merchant and urban networks in both spaces, this session focuses on the process that led to their final integration
Presentation
The interconnection of Mediterranean and Baltic areas through the Atlantic coasts was one of the major achievements of maritime navigation and trade in the Middle Ages, which contributed to the articulation of European markets.
By promoting a compared reflection on the characteristics and evolution of Mediterranean and Baltic medieval merchant and urban networks, the aim of this session is to analyse and better understand the process that led to their final integration.
In the classic German historiography on the Hansa, a distinction was made between the ‘merchant’ Hansa phase and the ‘city’ Hansa phase. Although this distinction is nowadays considered old-fashioned and very nuanced, and such categories have never been applied to the Mediterranean space, they could be useful for the comparison of both areas’ networks.
Can we distinguish, in both spaces, between merchant and urban networks?
Can Mediterranean and Baltic medieval merchant and urban networks be compared under such categories?
Which was the role of the Mediterranean and Baltic main ports and hinterlands in maritime trade?
To what extent can we establish parallelisms between Mediterranen and Baltic spaces? Did they have different or similar dynamics?
Can we emphasize possible synchronic and diachronic common patterns?
Although trade is at the basis of the comparison, approaches considering a specific focus for a comparative analysis of Mediterranean and Baltic urban networks (law, political structures and cooperation, sea routes, navigation) will also be considered.
Session 5
Specialist Session
Crusades and Urban Resilience: Jerusalem’s Networks, 1077–1260
Organizers
- Ali Hoghooghi
Department of History, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran - Shahram Yousefi-Fard
University of Tehran
Keywords
Crusades, urban resilience, Jerusalem, medieval networks, urban history
Synthesis
The session adresses Jerusalem’s adaptation to Crusades via forts, markets, and trade, linking Europe and Islam. Invites papers on urban resilience and networks
Presentation
The session focuses on examining the impact of wars between different governments and religions over the control of Jerusalem, particularly the Crusades, on the historical, social, and cultural transformations of the city of Jerusalem from the period of the Fatimid control of the city to the end of the Mamluk rule. This period is regarded as a significant chapter in the history of the city, having profound and extensive effects on its social, economic, and cultural structures. Additionally, the session will analyze the physical and morphological changes in the city, the economic impacts on the daily lives of its inhabitants, and the social inequalities arising from these conflicts.
Moreover, the session will explore the social and cultural relationships among various religious groups in Jerusalem and the effects of the wars on these relationships. Key questions include changes in settlement patterns and population migrations, economic impacts, and transformations in the social and cultural identity of the residents. The findings of this session can contribute to a better understanding of the historical and social complexities of Jerusalem and pave the way for future research in this field.
Session 6
Main Session
Premodern European small towns and their networks (1200-1550)
Organizers
- Lluís Sales i Favà
Universitat de Girona - Albert Reixach i Sala
Universitat de Lleida - Richard Goddard
Department of History, University of Nottingham - James Davis
Queen’s University Belfast
Keywords
small towns, medieval Europe, early modern Europe, commercial networks, demography
Synthesis
Small towns in pre-modern Europe were urban settlements typically centered around a market and characterized by a significant proportion of their population engaged in non-agricultural occupations. In this sessions we welcome comparative proposals that examine regional differences across Europe, contrasting more urbanized cores with peripheral zones between circa 1200 and 1600.
Presentation
Session 7
Main Session
Moving people: residential mobility and the housing market in European cities (1200-1800)
Organizers
- Colin Arnaud
Universität Münster - Arie van Steensel
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen - Herbert Krammer
Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vienna
Keywords
residential mobility, housing market, social topography, migration
Synthesis
Residential mobility has long been neglected in the urban history of premodern Europe. In this session, we aim to comparatively examine patterns, causes and effects of urban residential mobility, linking them to developments regarding the housing and rental markets, social topography, inequality and social mobility.
Presentation
City networks in the premodern world were largely structured by the flow of people, while at the same time a constant influx of migrants was a crucial factor in demographic growth. Recent research has shown that inhabitants also exhibited a high degree of residential mobility, moving around within the cities where they settled for longer or shorter periods. Given economic opportunities, changing living conditions, and life-cycle events, finding a (better) place to live was an important step in securing safety and livelihoods when moving to or within the same place.
Tracing changes of residence is generally difficult for the premodern era. This session aims to examine premodern urban patterns of residential mobility from economic, social and spatial perspectives in order to understand its causes and consequences at individual, collective and societal levels. However, migrants are often not visible in the sources until after they have moved. The moment of change of residence, whether for long-distance migration or inner-city moves, is difficult to capture. As a result, residential mobility has long been neglected in premodern research, although some studies have shown a significant turnover of residences.
Through technical advances in database management and in GIS, new research projects based on property or tax registers (for example for London, Bruges, Vienna, Basel or Leiden) promise to go beyond the mere analysis of stability rates and offer a more comprehensive understanding of residential mobility as a widespread urban phenomenon. In this session, we invite scholars to present studies on the dynamics of residential change from social, cultural, spatial, and economic perspectives, reflecting the influence of urban development, mobility patterns and economic conditions.
We are interested in papers on the following research topics:
– The scope of residential mobility and its intersection with migration.
– Homeownership and (sub)tenancy: How have the relationships between homeowners, tenants and subtenants influenced patterns of residential mobility?
– The impact of residential mobility on social topography, inequality and social mobility? Did residential mobility lead to the formation of specific neighbourhoods? How did residential mobility contribute to the development of distinct social profiles in different neighbourhoods?
– Housing and rental market dynamics and residential mobility. How often did residents move or owners change? How did the availability and quality of housing impact residential mobility?
– Residential strategies of migrants: what different (e.g. family, occupation, status) factors influenced their decision to settle in particular neighborhoods or areas within a city? Was residential mobility linked to the life cycle? To what extent did affection play a role in choice of residency?
– Urban migration networks: How did migration flows between cities and towns contribute to the shaping of networks between them?
Session 8
Main Session
Capitals of Capital: Credit Networks and Financial Markets in Europe (13th–18th Centuries)
Organizers
- Antoni Furió
University of Valencia - Pere Verdés-Pijuan
CSIC, IMF, Barcelona
Keywords
credit networks, public debt, financial agents, late medieval and early modern economy
Synthesis
This session explores the emergence of Europe’s first financial capitals between the 13th and 18th centuries, with a particular focus on the late medieval origins of credit networks, urban finance, and public debt. Emphasizing cities such as Florence, Lübeck, Kraków, Tallinn, and Stockholm, it examines how merchant-bankers and political authorities developed innovative financial instruments and institutions to meet the growing demands of trade, governance, and warfare. The session encourages contributions that highlight the role of cities as nodes of financial innovation and examine how these early systems shaped the long-term integration of private capital and state finance across the European continent.
Presentation
This session invites scholars to explore the emergence and development of Europe’s first financial capitals between the 13th and 18th centuries, with particular emphasis on the medieval origins of international credit networks, urban financial institutions, and systems of public finance. Drawing on the interpretive framework of Capitals of Capital by Youssef Cassis, we propose to examine these cities not simply as centers of capital accumulation and circulation, but as active hubs in the construction of transregional financial systems—spaces where private actors and political authorities forged innovative solutions to the challenges of credit, risk, and public debt.
A central focus of the session will be placed on the late medieval period, when large cities such as Florence, Venice, Genoa, Barcelona, Valencia, Bruges, Ghent, and major urban centers of the Holy Roman Empire (including Lübeck, Cologne, and Nuremberg) began to articulate sophisticated forms of financial organization. Yet these developments were not confined to Western Europe. Cities such as Riga, Tallinn, and Vilnius in the Baltic region; tockholm and Bergen in Scandinavia; and Kraków, Prague, and Lviv in Central and Eastern Europe also played significant roles in shaping regional and interregional credit systems. These cities hosted dynamic merchant communities and developed institutional frameworks—sometimes rooted in Hanseatic traditions, sometimes in local legal cultures—that facilitated financial intermediation across borders. While the Italian city-states are often seen as pioneering cases, recent scholarship has also highlighted the precocious development of public debt systems in the Crown of Aragon, the Low Countries, and increasingly in Central and Eastern Europe, where communal institutions, tax-backed loans, and early bond markets (annuities) became essential tools of governance to cope with growing fiscal and military pressures. German, Baltic, and Polish merchant cities, too, played a crucial role in structuring regional credit and investment flows. At the heart of these transformations stood merchant-bankers: versatile economic agents who combined trade, lending, and political negotiation. Their dual role—as creditors to both private clients and governments—positioned them as indispensable mediators between capital markets and state finance. Their activities spurred the development of new legal instruments, accounting practices, and contractual forms, as well as the emergence of early financial markets. In many cases, the demands of war finance and territorial administration drove innovations in credit mechanisms and reinforced the integration between urban economies and state-building processes.
We especially welcome contributions that foreground the medieval foundations of these dynamics, while also inviting comparative or diachronic approaches that trace their evolution into the early modern period. Suggested topics include (but are not limited to):
• The institutions and actors that transformed late medieval cities into international financial hubs.
• The emergence and evolution of public debt systems in urban settings across Europe, including Italy, Iberia, Flanders, the Holy Roman Empire, the Baltic region, Scandinavia, and Eastern Europe.
• The role of merchant-bankers – as well as of ethnic, familial, or confessional networks – in shaping credit markets, financial instruments, and inter-city and transnational capital flows.
• The development of credit markets, accounting practices, legal instruments, and fiduciary norms.
• The interaction between private finance and the fiscal needs of urban governments and monarchies.
• Financial innovation and regulation in times of war, crisis, or political transition.
By highlighting the long-term interplay between commerce, finance, and political authority across Europe, this session seeks to shed light on the historical foundations of modern financial capitalism—and the diverse urban environments that made it possible.
Session 9
Main Session
Urban consumption and urban networks: Italy and the Southern Low Countries (13th-16th centuries)
Organizers
- Marc Boone
Ghent University - Elisabeth Crouzet-Pavan
Sorbonne Université - Ilaria Taddei
Université Grenoble Alpes
Keywords
urban networks, Italy, the Southern Low Countries, goods flow, comparative approach
Synthesis
This proposal examines urban networks in the Italian Peninsula and the southern Low Countries (13th–16th centuries), focusing on the flow of commodities and circulation of objects linked to the evolution of urban consumption. A comparative approach highlights the connections between these networks and their integration into other systems.
Presentation
This proposal focuses on the interrogation of how urban networks were functioning both across the Italian Peninsula and in the southern Low Countries. The chosen analytical framework examines the flow of commodities and the circulation of objects in relation to evolving consumption patterns. It will highlight the new insights put forward by the results of recent historical research and its methodological implications with the aim to stimulate a comparative approach.
Three levels of observation will be privileged in order to put this in perspective.
First: on a basic level it will be necessary for both territories to ascertain how the circulation of raw materials, of manufactured products, of semi-luxury and luxury items was integrated into regional markets and in broader urban networks. This will elicit the question about how far did the exchanges played a role in the way the networks were structured, got polarized, evolved and were in some cases restructured? In a second phase this will need to be put into a precise chronological order so as to make clear how in function of well-defined exchanges the networks of both Italy and the southern Low Countries got connected and intertwined. Finally, this may offer insights into how both networks were connected to the outside world and to other networks, taking into consideration the nature of the products, the means of exchange and its actors.
In 2005 two of the promotors of the proposal already organized in the context of the 7th congress of the EAUH (Athens) a session entitled « Villes de Flandre et d’Italie (XIIIe-XVIe siècle). Les enseignements d’une comparaison ». The results of which were published in a collection of essays in 2008 (Studies in European Urban History, vol. 12, Brepols publishers). The aim of the present proposal is, by putting the notion of network at the center, to actualize this comparative approach, often invoked by specialists of both entities but seldom systematically realized.
Session 10
Main Session
Jewish Networks in Medieval Europe: Urban Interactions and Judeo-Christian Relations in the Development of the City
Organizers
- Jordi Fernández-Cuadrench
Societat Catalana d’Estudis Històrics, Barcelona - Robert Baró i Cabrera
Canonge Arxiver, S.E. Catedral Basílica de Barcelona
Keywords
Jewish communities; urban networks; Judeo-Christian relations; Medieval economy; Europe
Synthesis
This session explores the central role of Jewish communities in shaping medieval Europe’s urban networks, highlighting their interactions with Christians in fields such as commerce, finance, culture, and urbanism, and offering a comparative and transregional perspective on Judeo-Christian urban coexistence.
Presentation
Main question: What roles did Jewish communities play in shaping medieval European urban networks, and how did their relationships with Christian communities influence the development of these cities?
Key themes: The settlement of Jewish communities as nodes in the urban fabric of Europe Economic, social, and cultural interactions between Jews and Christians Jewish quarters as centers of intellectual and artisanal production Jewish diplomacy and mediation in multicultural cities Impact of persecution and expulsions on urban transformations
Comparative approaches between European cities and other Mediterranean contexts
Historiographical relevance and scholarly opportunity:
The Jewish presence in medieval European cities had a profound impact on their political, economic, and social development. While historiography has often emphasized legal marginalization and persecution, recent research highlights the proactive role of Jewish communities in the creation of a dynamic and interconnected urban world. This session proposes a relational approach that frames Jewish life not in isolation but within a broader matrix of Judeo-Christian interaction, revealing cities as sites of negotiation, coexistence, and mutual influence across the continent.
Session objectives:
To analyze how Jewish communities acted as bridges within Europe’s commercial and intellectual networks
To examine forms of coexistence, collaboration, and conflict with Christian populations in urban contexts
To provide comparative perspectives with Jewish experiences in the Middle East and North Africa
To investigate the urban consequences of expulsions and repression
To reframe medieval cities as shared spaces shaped by cross-cultural interaction
Potential session topics:
Jewish commercial networks in Europe: structures, actors, and regional variation
Urban coexistence: patterns of interaction and tension between Jews and Christians
The built environment of Jewish quarters: integration and segregation
Jewish visibility in the public sphere: diplomacy, medicine, and cultural exchange
Intellectual mobility: Jewish schools, translation movements, and urban knowledge hubs
Migrations and displacement: the reshaping of Jewish-European networks after expulsion
Trans-Mediterranean relations: urban Jewish life across Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East
This session aims to offer a renewed interpretation of medieval cities as dynamic arenas where Jewish communities not only endured but actively participated in shaping the cultural and economic networks that defined the European Middle Ages.
Session 11
Specialist Session
Inter-Urban Women’s Networks in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe: Gendered Connections, Legal Frameworks, and Institutional Influence
Organizers
- Michaela Antonín Malaníková
Department of History, Palacký University Olomouc - Anna Molnár
King’s College London
Keywords
gender, women’s networks, Pre-Modern, legal traditions, religious communities
Synthesis
This session examines inter-urban networks in pre-modern Europe, with a focus on the connections forged by and for women across urban centres. We aim to explore both the networks that actively linked women’s communities—especially religious ones—across cities and regions, and the broader institutional frameworks (such as legal traditions).
Presentation
This session examines inter-urban networks in late medieval and early modern Europe through the lens of gender, with a particular focus on the connections forged by and for women across urban centres. We aim to explore both the networks that actively linked women’s communities—especially religious ones—across cities and regions, and the broader institutional frameworks that shaped women’s lives, such as transregional legal traditions. These include urban legal systems in southern, western, and central Europe that extended their influence into virtually all spheres of life, from family relations to economic activity, including women’s participation in guilds.
We welcome papers that investigate the relationships between women’s communities—especially monastic, conventual, or semi-formal associations such as Beguines—across different cities. These connections might include the circulation of ideas, reform movements, or economic cooperation, such as credit provision. We also invite contributions that consider the less visible, yet significant, networks of influence that shaped laywomen’s lives, such as legal frameworks and urban norms governing economic and familial roles.
The session seeks to identify and analyse the types of inter-urban networks in which women were active participants, as well as those—such as legal traditions—that shaped their environments from without. Key questions include:
1. What forms of inter-urban women’s networks can be identified in late medieval and early modern European cities?
2. Which networks or frameworks—such as urban legal traditions—exerted influence over women’s lives, and in what domains?
3. How did regional variation affect the nature and perception of these networks across Europe?
While the study of historical networks has gained traction in recent decades—particularly with the rise of digital humanities—the analysis of pre-modern women’s networks remains underexplored, especially in regions such as Central, Eastern, and Southern Europe. This session aims to address this gap by bringing together research that sheds light on women’s inter-urban connections, their mechanisms of cohesion, and their broader societal implications.
Session 12
Main Session
Porous walls. Political networks and travelling ideas among cities in Europe, 1200-1800
Organizers
- Jelle Haemers
Professor, KU Leuven - Marta Gravela
Università di Torino - Christian Liddy
Professor, Durham University
Keywords
urban politics, democracy, networks, collective action
Synthesis
This session wants to discover how porous urban walls were when it came to political cooperation and the transfer of political ideas among towns (1200-1800). We invite speakers to trace the political networks between urban (and rural) communities and to consider the inspiration for political action citizens sought in other towns and communities.
Presentation
Cities have long been considered the engine of political change. Historians give a key role to cities in the creation of institutions of political representation and the spread of democracy in Europe. Political cooperation across city boundaries could lead to the formation of powerful alliances between cities and the creation of representative institutions.
Yet some important aspects of the political interaction between cities remain understudied, perhaps because of the existence of another, equally powerful narrative. ‘Every town is and wants to be a world apart’, wrote Fernand Braudel, while noting that most of them had walls. Walls served multiple functions, but they helped, above all, to give townspeople a heightened sense of their own, separate identity.
However, first, questions persist about the dynamics of the political interaction between residents of different towns. In the High Middle Ages, urban communes emerged in different places at roughly the same time. Between the 14th and 16th centuries, similar ideas and practices of citizenship and political engagement spurred citizens to revolt in different cities. Yet the coincidence of chronology and a shared corpus of ideas gets us no closer to understanding how and with what consequences townspeople communicated with each other and with the inhabitants of other communities. How might we explain the fact that residents of smaller towns and rural communities also demanded participation and rights simultaneously with citizens from larger towns?
Second, while the joint resistance of cities to local lords is already well known, the collective action of smaller urban and rural networks is much less examined. We still know little about how inhabitants from different towns forged alliances, as, for example, did artisans from different towns in the Rhineland, or how political refugees kept in touch with each other during the Reformation. The clandestine correspondence between men and women from different towns, the exchange of ideas between townspeople and peasants at the local level, the journeys made by insurgents, and so on – is it possible to map this multi-faceted activity in order to uncover the ‘rebellious networks’ that people built across the town walls?
For our session, we invite speakers who think across city boundaries: how have citizens influenced others with their ideas of political representation and accountability? To what extent did political change in rural communities affect towns? Can we retrieve traces of (clandestine) correspondence between men and women of different cities in times of commotion? Did exiles and newcomers trigger political change within towns? Why did cities join to create representative institutions in a wider region, and why did urbanites fail to set them up in other regions? Rather than focus on political change in one urban community, then, we invite speakers to study the political connections between, within, and across urban and rural networks.
Session 13
Main Session
Fiscal Source-Based Insights on Short, Medium, and Long-Term Inequality in Urban and Semi-Urban Settlements (Western Europe, 13th-19th centuries)
Organizers
- Laura Miquel Milian
Universitat de València - Andreu Seguí Beltrán
Universitat de les Illes Balears - David Carvajal de la Vega
Universidad de Valladolid - Ramon Ramon-Muñoz
Universitat de Barcelona
Keywords
inequality, metropolitan areas, fiscal sources, external shocks, Europe
Synthesis
This session aims to explore economic inequality in urban and semi-urban Western Europe (13 th -19 th centuries) using fiscal sources. It pretends to foster comparative insights into short, medium, and long-term trends in wealth, taxation, stratification, and network configurations, emphasizing methodological innovation.
Presentation
Over the last decades, a burgeoning literature has considered cities more unequal than rural areas. Research has also traced the evolution of pre-industrial inequality and analysed the
potential factors behind it. While epidemics, conflicts, riots, and natural disasters could disrupt inequality temporarily, institutional resilience often re-established the disparities in pre-
industrial societies. As a result, recent scholarship has emphasized the need for empirical long-term perspectives on inequality. In order to do that, academics have recognised the richness of premodern fiscal records as tools for reconstructing stratification of wealth and income across time and space.
Building on a growing literature on this topic, this session aims to foster a comparative discussion on the evolution of inequality across urban and semi-urban environments -from
medieval communes, market towns, and agro-towns to early modern and industrialised cities-. Contributions on how cities exacerbated inequality throughout their respective metropolitan areas or how institutions used fiscal policies to counteract wealth accumulation and optimize tax collection are also invited. By bringing together case studies from across Western Europe, the session seeks to illuminate structural patterns and local specificities in the distribution of wealth and social status.
Therefore, a key objective is to reflect on how inequality manifested at a multiscale level and how this was shaped by shifting institutional, demographic, and economic contexts. In this process, all factors, such as urban growth and contraction, settlement dependences, fiscal reforms, plagues and epidemics, warfare, commercial expansion, and changes in political regimes, influenced resources accumulation, taxation, and redistribution. At the same time, the structure and purpose of fiscal systems themselves profoundly conditioned the visibility and measurement of inequality.
We invite fiscal-source based proposals to address questions such as:
– How did patterns of wealth and income inequality evolve in different types of urban and semi-urban communities?
– How urban networks influenced potential wealth extraction and inequality generation?
– What role did taxation and fiscal regimes play in shaping or reflecting social hierarchies?
– How did external shocks (e.g. pandemics, wars, economic crises) affect levels of inequality over time?
– What methodological challenges and opportunities arise when using fiscal sources to reconstruct historical inequality?
– How did inequality differ across regions, political systems, or urban morphologies?
This session particularly encourages papers with methodologically innovative approaches, leverage serial or longitudinal data, or propose new interpretations of well-known sources.
Whether focusing on medieval communes, early modern towns, or transitional spaces, contributions to this session will help to build a more nuanced and diachronic picture of inequality in pre-industrial Europe.
Session 14
Main Session
Good Governance and Urban Conflict in Late Medieval and Early Modern Cities in Europe and Beyond (13th-17th Centuries)
Organizers
- David Napolitano
Utrecht University - Àngel Casals
Universitat de Barcelona - Minne De Boodt
UCLouvain and KU Leuven Universities - Darko Darovec
Institure IRRIS, Marezige, Slovenia
Keywords
urban conflict, good governance, Europe, Middle East and Asia, 13th-17h centuries
Synthesis
This session proposes a critical examination of principles of good governance in the world of city politics, juxtaposed with the practices that fostered and managed conflict within urban environments. It aims to bring together specialists from different fields for an integrated and globally informed discussion of good governance and urban conflict across cities in Europe, the Middle East and Asia (13th-17th centuries).
Presentation
This session proposes a critical examination of principles of good governance in the world of city politics, juxtaposed with the practices that fostered and managed conflict within urban environments, expressed through negotiation, critique, resistance, or violence.
What made for “”good governance”” in Medieval and Early Modern cities? More than the promotion of specific institutional forms, it was its success in managing a diverse community that truly defined effective governance. Citizens, for example, articulated sophisticated ideas about justice or the common good. They crafted elaborate guidelines for urban governors, experimented with various forms of associative life, and reshaped urban space, all in an attempt to realize good urban governance.
At the same time, urban societies contained a complex ecosystem of corporations, groups, and families that operated both within and outside institutions in a fragile equilibrium. This delicate balance could often lead to forms of confrontation with urban governments.
Studies of the urban world and its diverse manifestations have, however, suffered from excessive fragmentation. There’s been a problematic imposition of a fictitious chronological divide (Middle Ages – Early Modern Age), a territorial parcelling that hinders comparative analysis and the construction of theoretical models, and a thematic division that distances theoretical knowledge from the practical realities of daily urban life.
By approaching the city not simply as an administrative unit but as a lived and contested space of governance, this session aims to foster a more integrated and globally informed understanding of good governance and urban conflict. To this end, it aims to bring together specialists from different fields, studying urban governance and conflict across cities of Europe, the Middle East, and Asia from the thirteenth to the seventeenth centuries.
Topics may include, but are not limited to:
• The creation and circulation of texts and discourses (written, visual, or urban planning) that define good governance, the virtues and obligations of city governors, city officials and other members of the urban community and its institutions (including the monitoring, accountability and sanctioning mechanisms designed to ensure adherence to such ideals of good governance in daily practice).
• The existence of diverse associative frameworks (at both the elite and non-elite level, i.e. from parishes or guilds to day laborers and marginalized groups) and their role in government participation or as tools of resistance against “”bad governance.””
• The expression of conflict within the urban setting, ranging from propaganda to the use of violence, encompassing both factional violence in the struggle for power and social violence in its various degrees.
Session 15
Main Session
Governing Water: Administrative Responses to Urban Water Management in the Late Middle Ages and Early Modern Period (1200-1800)
Organizers
- Nele De Raedt
UCLouvain - Merlijn Hurx
KU Leuven - Jaap-Evert Abrahamse
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Keywords
urban water management, late medieval and early modern governance, knowledge exchange, architecture and infrastructure
Synthesis
Water management was a key challenge for late medieval and early modern cities (1200-1800). This session explores how administrations faced the challenges of water through the installation of governmental bodies, the development of architectural and infrastructural projects, and the knowledge exchange on these issues among cities across the globe.
Presentation
Water management is a central issue in urban governance. Both an essential resource for human life and a potential existential threat, water plays a crucial role in daily urban environments, from providing potable water, maintaining sanitary conditions, to facing environmental hazards such as prolonged droughts or flood risks. In addition, water determined the economic success of cities as waterways were indispensable for long-distance trade. Furthermore, the supply and drainage of water is by definition a collective problem that must be addressed at the level of the urban community. This presented local governments with numerous challenges that required city-wide responses. While water is ubiquitous, our relationship with water is deeply shaped by cultural factors. Urban communities across the world have historically developed very distinct approaches to addressing challenges posed by water. Communities are necessarily dependent on natural sources for their water supply, ranging from rivers and natural springs, to groundwater and rainfall. Also, the unpredictability of these natural supplies, the excess or the lack of it, caused by prolonged dry spells or floods, temporarily exposed urban communities to numerous risks.
Historical research has demonstrated that these issues were not unfamiliar to late medieval and early modern administrations (1200-1800). Indeed, in recent years research on the ways societies have dealt with different aspects of water has gained traction. However, the critical role of the development of administrative bodies remains insufficiently explored. In this historical period, numerous cities across the globe developed local governing bodies; coping with the challenges of water management was a central administrative issue. Additionally, attitudes toward water were significantly influenced by social, medical,and religious beliefs as well as available technology, which played a crucial role in shaping how local governments formulated their very own responses to these challenges.
This session examines the administrative challenges that late medieval and early modern cities faced regarding water management (1200-1800) and primarily explores the responses they developed. What governing bodies were established to regulate water management? How were these governing bodies organized? On what knowledge did administrators base their decisions? Was this knowledge exchanged between cities, and if so, in what ways? What specific architectural, infrastructural and landscape projects were implemented to address the challenges of water? How did social, medical and religious beliefs inform the political and social discourse surrounding water management? By bringing together scholars from various disciplines (political history, architectural history, medical history, history of technology…), this session aims to discuss to what extent water management became a topic of knowledge exchange between cities across the globe.
Session 16
Main Session
Hospitals and cities in Western Europe (1300-1550)
Organizers
- Salvatore Marino
Universitat de Barcelona - María Álvarez Fernández
Universidad de Oviedo - Stefano D’Ovidio
Università di Napoli Federico II
Keywords
hospitals, urbanization, women, work, childhood
Synthesis
The aim of the proposal is to analyse welfare reforms in urban contexts from a comparative and long-term perspective that considers the complex and slow evolution of hospital institutions and the healthcare, as well as health challenges they faced between the Late Middle Ages and the beginning of the Early Modern period.
Presentation
The study of welfare spaces and practices in urban contexts requires a comparative and long-term view of the complex and slow evolution of charity and hospital institutions as well as the care and health challenges they faced in assisting the needy, the poor and the sick between the Late Middle Ages and the beginning of the Early Modern Period. The hospital reform that took place at the end of the Middle Ages and the transmission of new hospital models must be analysed from multiple perspectives, with a multidisciplinary approach that considers the impact of these institutions in the urban contexts of south-western Europe from different points of view: hospital management and the development of new forms of accounting, administrative and financial culture; the medicalisation of practices and spaces; the deployment of all the care services provided by the hospitals (shelter, food, cure, education); the forms of work and spiritual commitment or the role played by these institutions in the configuration of a new urban space through the construction of new architectural forms and typologies, marked by a profound capacity for symbolic and urbanistic impact. A main objective of this session will also be to analyse women’s commitment both in the founding process and in the management and administration of these institutions.
We will select proposals that deal with any of the following aspects:
1) Hospitals as a physical and symbolic space within the urban configuration of cities from the perspective of hospital buildings, including the study of artistic and architectural forms; changes in urban morphology, new spaces of occupation, landscape transformations; the capacity of hospitals to project and influence their urban, economic, and social environment.
2) Hospitals as places of care, education and apprenticeship for abandoned children, as well as a means for adolescents’ integration into the labour market and, in general, into urban society.
3) The hospital as a creator of job opportunities, from the health sector (doctors, nurses, apothecaries) to food and care for abandoned children (cooks, nannies, merchants and artisans).
4) The role of women in the foundation, administration and smooth running of welfare institutions; thus, the prominence of queens in the foundation and financing of large urban hospitals, the women who worked daily in the welfare spaces (as cooks, nurses or volunteers), the network of nannies and wet-nurses who took temporary custody of abandoned children.
Session 17
Specialist Session
North and South. Strategies for old age in urban contexts during the Middle Ages and Early Modern Period
Organizers
- Mireia Comas Via
Universitat de Barcelona - Jaco Zuijderduijn
Lunds Universitet - Jaume Marcé Sánchez
Universitat de Barcelona
Keywords
ageing, retirement, elderly care, Middle Ages and Early Modern Period
Synthesis
This session aims to deepen our understanding of retirement and ageing strategies in medieval and early modern Europe. By comparing urban contexts across North and South, we aim to explore how local legal, cultural, social, and demographic factors shaped care for the elderly in different European cities.
Presentation
The interest in the strategies of retirement during the Middle Ages and Early Modern period has grown in recent years. The protection of the elderly is recognised as one of the fundamental rights of the European Charter, and it is also anticipated that this will be a major challenge for the upcoming decades as the population ages. Likewise, in this same vein, we must also take into account that the current ageing of the European population also has repercussions on the housing crisis for young people in cities everywhere in the continent: ageing populations also means that less housing becomes available for the young and in this respect premodern strategies for old age, including home-sharing between generations, may offer solutions or lessons. Consequently, historical scholarship has begun to examine how, in the past, old age and ageing was secured by individuals or institutions. Nonetheless, while some studies have demonstrated the existence of many support systems in Northern and Central Europe, less attention has been paid to the strategies adopted in Southern European urban
contexts. This is strange, considering that Southern European were also characterized by variables that have been identified as contributing to challenges for ageing individuals, such as a large share of newcomers without a large family safety net, many lifetime celibates, and (grass) widows who had to make ends meet (eg. Lynch 2003).
This session aims to address this historiographical gap by fostering a comparative dialogue between Northern and Southern models of retirement in urban communities. David Reher (1998) suggested persisting contrasts in family systems in the North and South of Europe going back to the premodern period, and that these impacted attitudes to older relatives – but do these also apply to cities?
By comparing cities across Northern and Southern Europe, we aim to explore how local legal frameworks, cultural norms, social dynamics, and demographic patterns shaped the provision and experience of old-age care in diverse urban contexts. Emphasizing the city as a key site where policies, institutions, and community practices converged, this session will highlight how urban environments influenced the ageing process and the strategies developed to address it.
As the EAUH 2026 Conference will be held in Barcelona, we encourage the participation of researchers working on the challenges of ageing in the cities of the Crown of Aragon, but also of scholars that investigate diverse subjects concerning ageing and retirement. We welcome papers on subjects including, but not limited, to the following topics:
– Agency and strategies to anticipate self-retirement.
– Institutional care for the elderly (hospitals, confraternities, craft guilds, alms-houses, pious foundations, etc.)
– Municipal and public awareness of ageing.
– Legal frameworks about the care of the elderly.
– Gendered aspects concerning ageing.
– Daily life during old age.
This session aims to provide a richer understanding of how Europeans imagined and prepared for old age in the past, and how retirement practices reflected broader societal values and structures, by drawing connections between different urban European realities.
Session 18
Specialist Session
Consent and Sexual Violence in Late Medieval European Cities
Organizers
- Cécile de Morrée
Radboud University (Netherlands) - Chanelle Delameillieure
KU Leuven
Keywords
sexual Violence, Late Middle Ages, consent, justice, literature and culture
Synthesis
This session explores sexual violence and consent in late medieval Europe through an interdisciplinary lens. Connecting legal, social and literary history, it invites comparative studies across regions and source types to reassess how urban communities understood, regulated, and represented sexuality.
Presentation
This session will bring together scholars working across legal, social, and literary history, to examine how medieval urban communities understood, regulated, and responded to sexual behavior, particularly regarding sexual violence and consent. Existing scholarship often approached this topic through either literary or legal frameworks, with a primary focus on England, Italy and France. This panel seeks to broaden both the methodological and geographical scope by encouraging comparative case studies tied to cities across Europe and fostering interdisciplinary dialogue between social historians of law and justice and scholars of medieval literature and culture.
Medieval conceptions of sex and gender were deeply informed by Christian theology, often casting female sexuality as disruptive or morally ambiguous, associating women with lust, temptation and disorder. However, the extent to which such ideological constructs shaped societal responses to sexual behavior remains up for debate. While many scholars have argued that urban legal institutions functioned to enforce patriarchal norms and discipline female sexuality, recent studies suggest a more complex picture, that requires the study of a wider variety of sources, combining legal and literary frameworks in particular. Judicial practices were not monolithic; they varied significantly depending on local customs, social hierarchies, institutional structures and individual cases. As literature was ubiquitous in urban public life, songs and stories bring another perspective to this mosaic, voicing people’s thoughts, worries and wishes. Most importantly, both literary and legal sources indicate that people’s responses to force and abuse were more positive, equal and resilient than idealized and theoretical texts suggest. This panel therefore seeks to bring about an interdisciplinary conversation to do justice for the complex and sensitive topic of sexual violence.
To further examine this resilient side of medieval sexual culture, this session encourages papers about multilingual regions and cities as places of intercultural exchange. Recent studies have emphasized that many medieval European cities were essentially multilingual areas, fostering a free exchange of thought across languages by their interconnectedness. These circumstances may have been crucial to the emergence of new ideas regarding sexuality, gender and power.
This session proposes a space for comparison: How were sexual violence and consent reflected in different types of sources, targeting different audiences and objectives? How did legal systems interpret consent and adjudicate cases? How did literary texts reflect or challenge norms, especially across linguistic boundaries? Papers connecting legal records and literary sources or exploring lesser-studied jurisdictions are especially welcome, to chart a more critical understanding of how medieval societies confronted sexual violence and negotiated consent.
Session 19
Main Session
Cross disciplinary approaches to domestic cultures in premodern cities in Europe and beyond, 13th-17th centuries
Organizers
- Julie De Groot
Universiteit Antwerpen - Daniel Lord Smail
Harvard University - Juan Vicente García Marsilla
Universitat de València
Keywords
premodern domestic cultures, interdisciplinary methodologies, material culture, urban identity, gender and class
Synthesis
This session examines premodern urban domestic cultures through interdisciplinary methods, integrating archaeology, historical texts, material culture, iconography, and social history. By combining diverse sources, it reveals the complexities of domestic life and its cultural dynamics in cities across Europe and beyond.
Presentation
The study of premodern domestic cultures in urban contexts has often been constrained by traditional disciplinary boundaries and a limited range of sources. This session aims to break new ground by bringing together interdisciplinary methodologies and diverse types of sources to examine domestic cultures in premodern cities. It will explore how recent innovations in historical research, material culture studies, art history, and archaeological analysis can be used to shed new light on the diverse ways in which people who lived in cities engaged with and shaped their environment.
Recent scholarship has increasingly focused on the concept of the “”everyday”” and how daily practices and material conditions shape cultural identities. This shift reflects a growing interest in understanding the lived experiences of individuals and communities. However, scholars have often struggled with the limitations of available sources and methodologies when it comes to studying these spaces in detail.
In this context, the session will draw attention to the rich potential of combining a variety of sources — such as household inventories, legal documents, visual representations, and archaeological remains — alongside innovative methodologies, including digital modelling, spatial analysis, and experimental archaeology. By emphasizing new ways of approaching old questions, this session seeks to offer fresh insights into the cultural, social, and economic dynamics of these domestic environments.
Potential themes that will align with the aims of the session include:
– Interdisciplinary Approaches to Domestic Space: Exploring how different academic fields can be integrated to study domestic environments and urban life in premodern cities.
– Material Culture and Domestic Practices: Investigating how everyday objects, furniture, and domestic artifacts reflect cultural values and social hierarchies within urban homes.
– The Role of Architecture in Shaping Domestic Life: Analysing how the design, layout, and construction of homes influenced the daily lives of premodern city dwellers.
– Gender, Class, and Domestic Space: Exploring how and to what extent domestic spaces were gendered and how different social classes experienced and used domestic environments in varying ways.
– Domestic Space and Urban Identity: Considering the relationship between private domestic spaces and the broader urban environment, including how homes both reflected and contributed to the identity of premodern cities.
– Digital Approaches to Domestic Culture: Showcasing the use of digital technologies to map and analyse domestic spaces in historic cities.
– Representation of Domestic Spaces in Art and Text: Examining how visual and literary representations of domestic interiors and domestic practices inform our understanding of daily life in premodern cities.
Session 20
Specialist Session
Medieval Performances of Urban Space in Europe based on Iures Urbices
Organizers
- Myrto Veikou
University of Patras - Christoph Kilger
Uppsala University
Keywords
Medieval cities, iures urbices, spatial performativity, spatial studies, medieval towns
Synthesis
The session promotes scholarly reflection on the dynamics between concepts and performances of urban spaces in medieval Europe. It focalizes the appearance of Urban Customary Laws in many places, whose content and synchronous circulation reflecting local norms and regulations, allude affinities amongst spatial performativity in urban settings.
Presentation
The session promotes scholarly reflection on performances of urban spaces in Medieval Europe by focusing on the appearance of specific legal texts in cities and towns. Urban laws allude to affinities amongst perceptions of urban spatial performativity; they reflect the outlines of active urban networks at land and sea. The session explores relations between urban legal frameworks and urban performances in varying geographies.
Medieval Urban Laws have attracted historiographical attention and been revisited from cultural and ideological approaches (Andrén 1998; Paschalidis 2010; Larson 2021; De Ruysscher 2023; Cuenca 2025). Despite their spatial regulations and architectural planning, they haven’t been analysed from a spatial perspective. Spatial performativity, as developed in Cultural Geography, is hence a promising concept for analysis here and invited floor of discussion (Glass & Rose-Redwood 2014). Furthermore, the Northwestern European codices (England, Netherlands, Scandinavia) have never been comparatively discussed with the South-European ones (Byzantium). By engaging in a comparative examination of selected texts through a spatial perspective and by its topic (performativity of urban networks, space and law) the session lies in the core of the EAUH 2026 Conference’s theme. The main questions concern the social meaning of these texts, historically contextualized: What was a common need throughout Europe, to which the appearance of the texts responded in this period? What social and political agents were involved in the texts’ composition and circulation? What earlier legislations were embedded within these texts and why? Which main principles in the social performativity of urban space are forwarded by each text? How do these principles compare amongst towns/cities in relation to different geographies, ethnicities, tensions based on ethnicity, local conflicts of interest, stakeholders, local and political structures? How do they relate with local conditions around the growth of urban class?
Themes
Spatial Performativity, Urbanity, Collective Identity, European Urban Class
Legislation, interurban links and urban networks
References
Andrén A,1998. Staden,himmel eller helvete.Tankar om människor istaden. Stockholm.
Blockmans W, 2010. Constructing a sense of community in rapidly growing European cities (11th-13th c.).Hist Res 83:575–587.
Cuenca Liberman E, 2025. The Making of Urban Customary Law in Medieval and Reformation England.Oxford.
De Ruysscher D, 2023. The Rule of Law in Cities of the Medieval Low Countries: Community-Building in Context.Hague J Rule Law 15:227–241.
Glass MR., Rose-Redwood R (eds) 2014.Performativity, Politics, and the Production of Social Space.London.
Larson AA, Dumolyn J, 2021.‘Liberty and the Rule of Law’-The Common Good. In Napolitano D, Penningtond K (eds) A cultural history of democracy in the medieval age, 37–56. London.
Paschalidis Ν, 2010. Ο Νομοφύλαξ Κωνσταντίνος Αρμενόπουλος και η Εξάβιβλος. Thessaloniki.
Session 21
Specialist Session
The Memory of Cities: Scriptural Practices and Archives in Urban Spaces in Medieval and Early Modern Europe.
Organizers
- Josepa Cortés-Escrivà
Universitat de València - Gema Capilla-Aledón
Universitat de València - Antoni Mas-Forners
Universitat de les Illes Balears
Keywords
public records, private records, scriptural practices, medieval and early modern history
Synthesis
From the 13th century onwards, writing spread widely in European cities, becoming essential in both public and private life. A documentary revolution emerged, marked by new types of documents for practical use. Urban spaces became centres of written expression, producing texts in all areas, reflecting the life, government and economy of the city.
Presentation
From the 13th century onwards, European cities made increasing use of writing, both in the public and private spheres. The written text went from being restricted to very specific circles, mainly ecclesiastical or high levels of civil power, to being a vital, indispensable necessity, present in all contexts of social and personal life. The creation of a written memory, intended to be permanently preserved, of public affairs and private activities, meant a real documentary revolution. And this transformation is not only quantitative but especially qualitative, since it produced a great diversification of documentary types, many of them absolutely new, oriented towards practical purposes, which will give rise to new written records and new archives.
The early medieval city is the privileged space in which to observe this phenomenon. From the surviving testimonies, we know that writing was omnipresent in the lower medieval cities. Even in those environments where there was no direct need for it, written text was no stranger, there was almost permanent contact: on commemorative inscriptions and funerary tombstones, on the phylacteries of altarpieces and church frescoes, on the signs of shops and inns, on advertisements for goods, on the posters of public authorities or transgressive pamphlets, on the visit to the notary’s office or the offices of the municipal government. Even on furniture, curtains, floor coverings or crockery, single letters, words, phrases or currencies are often used as decorative elements.
The new urban institutions, with an increasingly complex administration, generated an extensive network of establishments at the service of citizens. Private economic practices increased: commercial transactions and business management, participation in the credit market and the assumption of the convenience of putting everything in writing, of having recourse, on the one hand, to the notary to formalise contracts and protect oneself from future disputes, and also, on the other hand, to one’s own written, autographic register. This extension of writing practices to the private sphere, to the world of business, to trading companies, workshops and shops, and to the control of the family economy, with even personal news, will generate a whole set of new documents.
The archives produced in a city give us a very precise idea of the system of government, its economy, the activities that were carried out, its social cohesion and its organisational capacity. Not all of them have been preserved, especially those created in the private sphere, although some of them can be found indirectly in post-mortem inventories or through judicial intervention.
Within this framework, our session aims to attract papers that address some of the aspects related to the production, conservation and transmission of written records in urban areas and which constitute their memory, as an authentic radiography of their history and their distinctive features.
Session 22
Main Session
Beyond Centrality: Reassessing Urban Networks and Regional Hierarchies in Europe, 1300–1900
Organizers
- Katalin Szende
Central European University, Vienna/Budapest - Judit Majorossy
University of Vienna, Institute of History, Institute of Austrian Historical Research - Beatrix F. Romhányi
Gáspár Károli University of the Reformed Church, Budapest
Keywords
challenging central place theory, establishing development profiles, reassessing criteria of urbanity
Synthesis
The session examines urban hierarchies of Europe, focusing on the distinctions and interactions between cities, towns, and boroughs/market towns between 1300 and 1900, addressing regional disparities and functional differences. We welcome all methodological approaches, but particularly those that go beyond the Central Place Theory.
Presentation
This session explores the formation and transformation of urban networks and hierarchies in Europe between 1300 and 1900, with a particular interest in the roles of non-economic drivers of urban development. While the legacy of Central Place Theory (CPT) remains influential in urban historiography, we invite contributions that go beyond centrality-based models to consider the impact of administrative, cultural, social, and geopolitical factors on the interaction between cities, towns, and boroughs. The session is open to a wide range of methodological approaches, including historical GIS, qualitative microstudies, and comparative long-term analyses. Key issues in this context are:
– the identification of indicators of urban functions (direct or indirect) in different periods of time and various regions;
– possible ways of investigating regionality within European polities in a longue-durée approach;
– in which cases do these differences lead to the formation of hierarchical or non-hierarchical networks;
– under which circumstances do similar development profiles lead to conflict or competition;
– how are small market towns and boroughs complement the network of cities and what was their role in regional development.
These questions have often been approached within the framework of Central Place Theory, which tends to privilege economic centrality. We aim to broaden this perspective by integrating a more diverse set of factors into the analysis of urban functions and regional connectivity. We invite contributions addressing the following questions in any regional framework and any chronological focus between 1300 and 1900:
– What was the role of administrative units, such as parishes, communes or neighbourhoods, in differentiating, organising and concentrating human and natural resources?
– What part did cultural institutions and access to learning play in establishing contacts between nodes of an urban network?
– How can one assess the role of different ethnic and religious communities and social solidarities in strengthening or weakening ties between nodes of a network?
– What was the impact of environmental factors such as natural barriers or communication corridors in the formation of urban networks?
– In the light of all the above factors, how do we assess the weight of economy in shaping urban networks?
We hope that discussing the above questions in a broad spatial and temporal frame can contribute to reassessing the relationship between urban functions and spatial organisation. Thus, the session intends to pave the way to a more nuanced understanding of European urbanisation and its networks and hierarchies.
Session 23
Main Session
Quayside and Custom House: Customs Accounts as a Source for Medieval and Early Modern Urban History
Organizers
- Justin Colson
Institute of Historical Research, University of London - María Grove-Gordillo
Universität Bamberg - Werner Scheltjens
Universität Bamberg - Eliot Benbow
Institute of Historical Research, University of London
Keywords
trade, merchants, customs, ports, materiality
Synthesis
Customs accounts are amongst the most extensive surviving sources for many medieval and early modern towns, with huge potential to illuminate the ‘social life of things’ in the urban marketplace, urban networks, and the spaces of trade. This comparative session examines pre-modern customs records from all contexts and approaches.
Presentation
Customs accounts are amongst the most extensive surviving sources for many medieval and early modern port towns, with huge potential to illuminate the ‘social life of things’ in the urban marketplace, the relationships of urban networks, and the spatiality of trade. These sources are becoming more easily accessible through projects such as Sound Toll Registers Online, and Stuart Jenks’ editions of the London particular customs accounts. The latter are key to the AHRC-DFG-funded project ‘Unlocking Upcycled Medieval Data: North Sea Networks, People, and Commodities in the London Customs Accounts 1380-1560’, which runs at the University of London’s Institute of Historical Research and the University of Bamberg from 2025-27.
Customs accounts record the flow of goods, one of the most fundamental urban functions. Examining the ‘social life of things’ in the urban marketplace, customs accounts give us the potential to look at the goods being traded, their prices, and their quantities. How far can we observe the growth and contraction of urban industries through imports and exports? What can we tell about the standard of living and character of urban life from the records of the goods traded through those towns and cities?
Customs accounts also offer historians an unparalleled source for urban connectivity and trade networks. Mercantile activity was at the heart of the life of most medieval and early modern towns and cities, and customs records give us an unparalleled record of the networks and connections over which trade occurred. How did patterns of connections between cities change over time? How did merchants employ ships and shipmasters from across Europe, and how did they collaborate or compete on different trades?
Materiality can also be explored in customs records, both in terms of close analysis of the objects described as objects of trade, and in terms of the life and activity of the quayside and custom house. The variety of goods traded, and the terms used to describe them, give a unique perspective of the ‘consumer revolution’. The materiality of the port and shipping are also unlocked in customs records: thousands of chests, barrels, hogsheads, boxes, maunds and baskets flowed between towns, and sustained industries all of their own.
Customs records also open up other perspectives. How did the work of customs officials change across the medieval and early modern period? How did the records of customs and tariffs change over time and between jurisdictions? How did the authorities keep oversight of bustling ports and city gates, and how did the spatiality of these places influence the practices of merchants, ships’ crews, and carters?
As pre-modern ‘big data’, customs records offer huge analytical potential, and lend themselves to digital methods from Social Network Analysis to spatial analysis in GIS. We encourage submissions on pre-modern customs records from all contexts and approaches for this comparative session.
Session 24
Main Session
Invisible Currencies, Visible Cities: Trust, Information, and Urban Economies in the Late Medieval Mediterranean.
Organizers
- Sari Yehuda Nassar
University of Barcelona - Joan Beltran Todolí
University of Salamanca - Gerard Marí i Brull
University of Barcelona
Keywords
urban infrastructures of credit; risk and trust mechanisms; institutional and legal frameworks; economic information and archives; mediterranean market coordination
Synthesis
This session explores the role of late medieval Mediterranean cities as engines of credit, risk management, and information circulation.It highlights how urban institutions and mercantile networks shaped mechanisms of economic coordination.Contributions are welcomed from the fields of economic history, urban studies, and new institutional economics
Presentation
This session investigates the often invisible yet foundational infrastructures of credit, trust, risk management, and economic information that sustained the urban economies of the late medieval Western Mediterranean. Cities such as Barcelona, Valencia, Naples, and Marseille were not passive environments for commerce, but active producers of legal, cognitive, and institutional frameworks that enabled markets to function across space and time. These cities served as nodes of economic coordination, simultaneously managing uncertainty and generating legitimacy for financial and commercial practices.
The session seeks to reframe the late medieval city as a key actor in the circulation of knowledge, creditworthiness, and risk mitigation. We are particularly interested in how urban institutions—such as notarial systems, merchant tribunals, and consular courts—operated as information-rich environments that structured and facilitated economic life. Alongside these formal mechanisms, we welcome studies that address the informal circuits of trust and social reputation that shaped long-distance trade and capital flows, often in the absence of state enforcement. These dynamics are largely recoverable thanks to the written legacy preserved in urban centres, where chancelleries, notarial registers, commercial documents, and legal records serve as the principal sources for medieval economic history. This session invites reflections on the practices of written record-keeping, the materiality of these sources, and the methodological tools—particularly palaeography and diplomatics—essential for their analysis and interpretation. Cities not only structured economic coordination but also produced and safeguarded the very records through which economic historians reconstruct systems of credit, contractual practices, and strategies for managing risk.
We invite papers that engage with:
– The architecture and diffusion of urban credit instruments (e.g., bills of exchange, censals, maritime loans);
– Urban responses to economic volatility—such as war, famine, defaults, or monetary instability;
– The infrastructures of economic information: archives, correspondence, brokers, and rumours;
– The interaction between local governance and transregional commercial networks;
– Merchant strategies for coordinating exchange across fragmented jurisdictions and legal cultures;
– Comparative analyses of Mediterranean cities as financial and commercial hubs.
The session draws inspiration from economic history, urban studies, and new institutional economics. It encourages contributions grounded in archival research and theoretical reflection and highly welcomes approaches that integrate econometric methods within the field of economic history. Whether through microhistorical reconstructions, network analyses, or formal modelling of institutional performance, this session aims to foreground the role of cities as essential agents of coordination and innovation in the late medieval Mediterranean.
Customs accounts record the flow of goods, one of the most fundamental urban functions. Examining the ‘social life of things’ in the urban marketplace, customs accounts give us the potential to look at the goods being traded, their prices, and their quantities. How far can we observe the growth and contraction of urban industries through imports and exports? What can we tell about the standard of living and character of urban life from the records of the goods traded through those towns and cities?
Customs accounts also offer historians an unparalleled source for urban connectivity and trade networks. Mercantile activity was at the heart of the life of most medieval and early modern towns and cities, and customs records give us an unparalleled record of the networks and connections over which trade occurred. How did patterns of connections between cities change over time? How did merchants employ ships and shipmasters from across Europe, and how did they collaborate or compete on different trades?
Materiality can also be explored in customs records, both in terms of close analysis of the objects described as objects of trade, and in terms of the life and activity of the quayside and custom house. The variety of goods traded, and the terms used to describe them, give a unique perspective of the ‘consumer revolution’. The materiality of the port and shipping are also unlocked in customs records: thousands of chests, barrels, hogsheads, boxes, maunds and baskets flowed between towns, and sustained industries all of their own.
Customs records also open up other perspectives. How did the work of customs officials change across the medieval and early modern period? How did the records of customs and tariffs change over time and between jurisdictions? How did the authorities keep oversight of bustling ports and city gates, and how did the spatiality of these places influence the practices of merchants, ships’ crews, and carters?
As pre-modern ‘big data’, customs records offer huge analytical potential, and lend themselves to digital methods from Social Network Analysis to spatial analysis in GIS. We encourage submissions on pre-modern customs records from all contexts and approaches for this comparative session.
Session 25
Specialist Session
Urban networks and inland markets in the expansion of trade flows: the case of the Iberian Peninsula (14th-15th centuries)
Organizers
- Sandra de la Torre Gonzalo
Universidad de Zaragoza - Jeffrey Fynn-Paul
Universiteit Leiden
Keywords
inland markets; mercantile networks; regional specialisations; urban production; trade financing
Synthesis
This session aims to provide new insights into the economic articulation of large mercantile spaces in the later Middle Ages. It will focus on trade and financial flows in regions which appear at first glance to be far from major trade routes. We will use urban networks of smaller towns to map out lesser-studied tributaries to these routes.
Presentation
Session 26
Specialist Session
The "Other Cities" of the Crown of Aragon: Taxation, Trade, and Market Integration in the Fifteenth-Century Mezzogiorno
Organizers
- Esther Tello-Hernández
Institución Milà i Fontanals de Investigación en Humanidades, Barcelona - Luciana Petracca
Università del Salento
Keywords
taxation, trade, Mezzogiorno, integration, Crown of Aragon
Synthesis
Through a comparison of case studies focused on cities in the Mezzogiorno, this session seeks to enrich the historiographical framework regarding the relationships between urban economies and élites, Mediterranean trade interconnections, the negotiation of fiscal power, and opportunities emerging from warfare during the second half of the 15th century.
Presentation
During the second half of the fifteenth century, the “Italian” territories of the Crown of Aragon — namely the Kingdom of Sicily, the Kingdom of Sardinia, the Kingdom of Naples, and the Principality of Taranto — became increasingly integrated into a rationalized economic and market system. This integration led to a more systematic and pervasive tax administration of these territories, deeply affecting both their urban societies and fiscal structures.
Furthermore, the commercial networks of port cities were strengthened and expanded as a result of stimuli generated by the various military conflicts in which cities across Southern peninsular and insular Italy were involved to varying degrees. These included, for instance: the Neapolitan succession war (1459–1463), the Catalan Civil War (1462–1472), the uprisings in the Marquisate of Oristano (1470–1478), and the “Great Barons’ Conspiracy” (1485–1487).
This session proposal aims to explore how these cities of catalan-aragonese Southern Italy, through their ruling élites, negotiated the distribution of the fiscal burden with the central authority, managing tax collection in exchange for privileges. By presenting case studies from various universities it will be possible to compare interurban commercial taxation and examine how revenues from duties and taxes were reinvested locally.
Contributions that examine the commercial role of cities and their level of integration within the markets of other kingdoms of the Western Crown of Aragon are also encouraged. Priority will be given to proposals that consider economic opportunities arising from the social and military conflicts in which these kingdoms participated during the second half of the fifteenth century, particularly those addressing the import and export of raw materials and finished goods.
The session thus welcomes case studies that assess various aspects and dimensions of economic life in the principal southern cities. Topics of interest include: municipal revenues and expenditures, fiscal negotiations and disputes with royal agents, the economic role of urban élites, and integration into regional and transnational trade networks.
This proposal intends to give a contribution to the vibrant historiographical field on taxation in the Southern Italian kingdoms. At the same time, it aims to enhance perspectives of economic history research originating from catalan, valencian, aragonese, andalusian, and majorcan schools of economic history. The ultimate goal is to foster comparative discussion on how cities within the same Crown, —though characterized by different legal systems, social dynamics, and financial structures— responded to shared challenges. In doing so, the session will offer deeper insights into urban economies, Mediterranean interconnections and the functioning of fiscal power in the late Middle Ages.
Session 27
Specialist Session
Transference of urban models in the Iberian World: Castile and America (1400-1600)
Organizers
- David Igual-Luis
University of Castilla-La Mancha - María Ángeles Martín Romera
Complutense University of Madrid
Keywords
cities, Castile, America, transference, mobility
Synthesis
This session aims to discuss urban models and urban experiences across the Atlantic in the Iberian world, focusing on the multidirectional transference and exchanges that took place between Castilian and American regions in a decolonial perspective. The session is open to medievalists, modernists and scholars from any discipline working on Castilian and American cities.
Presentation
The Iberian Peninsula and in particular Castile were essential actors in the European expansion towards the Atlantic between the 15th and 16th centuries. In the case of Castile, the process of conquest and colonisation of America implied a complex exchange between both regions that included an organized effort to extend Castilian urban models towards the American continent. This phenomenon relied on the previous urbanization process that Castile had undergone during the Central and Late Middle Ages. The previous urbanization of Castile took place on three fronts: 1) within the kingdom, thanks to the construction of the internal network of cities and towns, its relations with the surrounding rural world and even its links with other Iberian countries; 2) towards the Muslim Kingdom of Granada, as an area of conquest in the 15th century; and 3) towards the Canary Islands, as the first horizon of implantation in the Atlantic. This succession of experiences, culminating in the American venture, favoured the transfer of territorial, institutional, social and economic mechanisms controlled and fostered by cities based on previous Castilian models. However, as decolonial studies have proven, this process was not unidirectional and it was highly determined by local communities in the different American territories. While the organization of colonial society attempted to partly replicate Castilian urban models, the adaptations and transformations of said models in America influenced the metropolis as well.
The link between the Late Medieval process of urbanization in Castile and the first Hispanic foundations in America has long been recognized by historiography, but it has not deserved sufficient attention for different reasons. Some of them include the traditional academic divide between scholars of the Middle Ages and the Modern Age or the disciplinary distinction between experts from Europe-Castile and America. In addition, the recent approaches of Global History or the History of Connectivity tend to focus more on specific elements such as commerce, but less on the urban phenomenon as a whole.
This session aims to overcome the gaps in the knowledge of this urban expansion and is open to medievalists, modernists and scholars from any discipline working on Castilian and American cities. The main question we wish to address is the expansion and transference of Castilian urban models towards America and how they were transformed along the process. In particular, we encourage the participants to explore the medieval origins of this expansion and its networks as well as how the transference of these models to new territories in America challenged and transformed Castilian urban networks as well.
There will be three key concepts for the session: the transfer and transformation of urban models, human mobility as the underlying reality of that transfer; and the notion of network. Ideally, we want to bring together contributions that address the four fronts previously mentioned: the urban expansion within Castile, towards Granada, towards the Canary Islands and towards America. We invite papers that discuss topics such as the material organization of territories, social structures and their evolution over time, institutions and their bureaucracy, voluntary or forced migration, economic variables and the expansion of ideas and cultural paradigms.
Session 28
Main Session
Ports, maritime communities, and urban life in Europe (15th-19th centuries)
Organizers
- Brendan J. von Briesen
Universitat de Barcelona - Pablo Sánchez Pascual
Universidad de Cantabria - Kalliopi Vasilaki
Università degli Studi di Genova
Keywords
maritime community; port; shipping; urban history; urban development
Synthesis
This session looks at the interplay between ports, maritime communities and urban life in European cities from the early modern period until today.
Presentation
This session brings together scholars dedicated to ports, maritime communities, and urban history and their interactions in European port cities from the modern period to today.
Over centuries, ports have provided the developmental basis of most of the major cosmopolitan cities of Europe — from the Atlantic Ocean to the Baltic, Black, North and Mediterranean Seas. While sometimes seen as frontiers between two worlds, the terrestrial and the maritime, they also provide crucial spaces for economic, cultural, and social exchange, giving them a vitality unmatched by land-locked cities. They are the locus for commerce, labour, life, and leisure, serving city dwellers with imported goods as well as trade opportunities for exporting goods from the hinterlands. In this process, the authorities, residents, workers, and merchants along with their families and social networks have created unique maritime communities dedicated to traffic and commerce that have largely defined urban life for centuries — even during processes of revolutionary infrastructural and technological transformations from the nineteenth century until today. This session welcomes proposals that consider the importance of ports as fundamental aspects of urban sociocultural and socioeconomic life — from studies dedicated to maritime communities and key actors and institutions in maritime labour and commerce, to studies focused on infrastructural developments and their impacts on urban life. Furthermore, we strongly encourage doctoral candidates to propose papers based on their research.
Session 29
Main Session
Feeding European Cities: Governance, Gender and Sustainability, from 15th century to present
Organizers
- Emmanuelle Charpentier
Université Toulouse-Jean Jaurès, FRAMESPA – UMR 5136 - Rosa-Maria Gil
Universitat de Girona - Mercè Renom
Universitat de Barcelona, TIG
Keywords
markets, policies, providers, protests, gender
Synthesis
The session aim to understand, from a gender and comparative perspective, how were organized urban food markets to maintain the sustainability of cities in a broad chronology, from the municipal control that governed from the late Middle Ages to the system of free market capitalism and its evolution towards the global economic system.
Presentation
Cities have been entirely dependent on the availability of food to feed their inhabitants, establishing essential networks between the countryside and the city and between cities. Geographic conditions, environmental productivity, availability of transportation, scientific and technical knowledge, and public policies have influenced urban food supply, conditioning the demographic dimension of cities and their sustainability.
The session aims to understand, from a gender and comparative perspective, how urban food markets were organized to maintain the sustainability of cities. We wish to know how public policies and cultural gender codes influenced urban food markets and the behaviours of those involved in the food supply. Those who provided meat, fish, fruits, vegetables and other aliments; or those who elaborated products such as bread, wine, beer or sweets; or those who were transporters or intermediaries between the countryside and the city. The rural-urban relations and agrarian specializations. The agents of social pressure and protests to ensure good food at a fair price, among others actors of the provisioning cities.
We distinguish two systems: the system of the nearly five centuries of pre-liberalism and municipal control, dating back to the Late Middle Ages; and the system of the recent centuries of free market capitalism within the framework of centralized states and their evolution to the global economic system.
Contributions may address the following questions:
• What urban supply was like in the pre-liberal centuries, when local governments and some guilds were responsible for it: what powers they had and what their limits were, what were the processes for acquiring urban collective goods and municipal monopolistic privileges, how the mechanisms against hoarding worked, what were the intervention policies in food quality and prices. The role of guilds involved in urban food supply. Country-city relations. Products who are out of the market beyond the control of municipal authorities (exchanges, gifts, self providing, food thefts); among others.
• How the transition from this system to the state-based free market capitalism took place: what instabilities and new institutions created, and what upward and downward mobility the agents of the old system experienced; how interurban relations between cities and the countryside changed.
• The new rules, institutions, and mentalities of the free-market food supply system. The role of prices and wages in living standards in the new industrial society, municipal action in the construction of supply infrastructure: slaughterhouses, markets, analysis laboratories, etc.; the contribution of architects to new spaces and the influence of commercial spaces on urban planning and the configuration of cities, among others.
We welcome gender and interdisciplinary perspectives, interurban comparisons, long-term approaches, and those focuses on the 18th-19th century transition.
Session 30
Main Session
Dealing with Disaster in Early Modern Cities (15th-19th centuries)
Organizers
- Alfredo Chamorro Esteban
Universitat de Barcelona - Milena Viceconte
Universitat de Lleida
Keywords
disasters; risk and prevention; urban policies; religious practices
Synthesis
Throughout the history, cities have been managing several catastrophes, such as famines, plagues, floods, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. This session aims to explore in a comparative perspective the material and spiritual practices developed to coping with them.
Presentation
Throughout the history, cities have been managing several catastrophes, such as famines, plagues, floods, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Some of these calamities have been exceptional, others were continuous or, at least, repeated quite often over time. That is the case, for example, of cities that were in the proximity of a volcano or in areas of high seismic risk: although their inhabitants were not aware of it, they knew quite well that the earth could shake at any moment. The risk or warning could also come from other sites, for example the cities situated close to the sea that were constantly facing the danger of epidemiological diseases caused by infectious ships arriving at the port. Also, by sea could come unexpected dangers with catastrophic consequences, such as tsunamis.
The climate change that occurred between the 15th and 19th centuries, known as the Little Ice Age, exposed many cities to micro-disasters, sometimes on an annual frequency, which tested the resilience of cities, both economically, politically and emotionally in the face of adversity. As reported by contemporary sources, from the written chronicles to the ex-votos and other artistic works, these events were crucial to provide a response and solutions for those affected and for the construction of preventive measures, with the aim of minimizing damage in the future. Also, spirituality was essential for the emotional balance of the inhabitants of the cities, as the interpretation of the disasters is frequently reporting as a sign of God’s fury and his punishment to the humanity for their behaviour. For that, a ritual commitment between lay and ecclesiastical authorities was crucial to ensure the safety of the people, through the invocation of saints and divine patron.
This session aims to explore in a comparative perspective how early modern cities have been dealing with disasters, especially in terms of both material and spiritual practices. For its general approach, the panel is part of a historiographical current that has been consolidated in recent decades, and which aims to examine disasters from the double view of management and the transmission of memory. In this sense, particularly useful has been the collaboration of both coordinators of this session to the European research project DisComPoSE – Disaster, Communication and Politics in South Western Europe (http://discompose.unina.it/) based at the University of Naples Federico II. This session aims to continue the work of this project by proposing a comparative analysis between different urban contexts in time of catastrophes.
Session 31
Specialist Session
The City Writes Back. Urban spaces and Political Communication in the Spanish Monarchy (15th–18th Centuries)
Organizers
- José Araneda-Riquelme
Università degli studi Roma Tre - Mathias Ledroit
Université Gustave Eiffel - Diego Sola García
Universitat de Barcelona
Keywords
urban political communication, epistolary culture, representational agents, urban networks, Spanish monarchy.
Synthesis
This session explores how cities of the Hispanic Monarchy (15th–18th c.) used correspondence to project authority, build alliances, and participate in governance. Urban letter collections reveal cities as active agents within political, institutional, and transatlantic networks.
Presentation
As recent research highlights, the urban world was a fundamental driver of political, social, and communicative dynamics within the Hispanic Monarchy. Cities were not passive backdrops to imperial power but vibrant, relational spaces that articulated their interests across local, regional, and transatlantic networks.
This session brings together new perspectives on the role of cities in early modern political communication, focusing on the analysis of urban letter collections as key sources for understanding how cities under the Spanish rule projected their voice, negotiated power, and built connections across vast territories. While letters have been widely studied for insights into family history, emotions, or individual biographies, their potential to reveal the urban dimension of political communication remains underexplored. Far from being isolated texts, municipal letters reflect the collective agency of cities—condensing civic interests, transmitting information, and shaping relations with other urban centers, institutions, and governing bodies. Many archives preserve extensive collections of municipal correspondence (16th–18th centuries), such as the volumes of the Consell de Cent of Barcelona (Arxiu Històric de la Ciutat) or the epistolary networks connecting Ibero-American cities preserved in the Archivo General de Indias. While much scholarship has concentrated on letters as tools of urban self-presentation, this session invites a broader perspective. It examines both outgoing and incoming correspondence to reveal how cities operated as political actors, weaving themselves into the complex networks of governance, negotiation, and information exchange across the Spanish Empire.
We aim to examine urban networks from two complementary perspectives. First, their multidirectional nature, visible in exchanges between cities—whether within individual kingdoms, across territorial borders, or extending to transatlantic spaces. Second, their pluri-scalar dimension, reflected in the relationships between municipal governments and other institutions, including diocesan curiae, cathedral chapters, conventual provinces, religious houses, and civic agents appointed to represent urban interests at centers of power. Urban letter-writing offers a key entry point for analyzing how cities projected authority, negotiated alliances, and asserted their presence within these overlapping spheres of influence. Epistolary communication reveals the ways cities engaged with distant territories, fostered political relationships, and sustained their role as active participants in early modern governance. Suggested thematic axes include:
• The evolution of urban epistolary practices over time
• Relationships and interdependencies between cities
• The role of civic agents, ambassadors, and procurators as intermediaries
• Linguistic and rhetorical strategies in urban political communication
• The artistic, symbolic, and cultural dimensions of letter exchanges
• Religious actors and ecclesiastical institutions as part of urban communicative networks”
The climate change that occurred between the 15th and 19th centuries, known as the Little Ice Age, exposed many cities to micro-disasters, sometimes on an annual frequency, which tested the resilience of cities, both economically, politically and emotionally in the face of adversity. As reported by contemporary sources, from the written chronicles to the ex-votos and other artistic works, these events were crucial to provide a response and solutions for those affected and for the construction of preventive measures, with the aim of minimizing damage in the future. Also, spirituality was essential for the emotional balance of the inhabitants of the cities, as the interpretation of the disasters is frequently reporting as a sign of God’s fury and his punishment to the humanity for their behaviour. For that, a ritual commitment between lay and ecclesiastical authorities was crucial to ensure the safety of the people, through the invocation of saints and divine patron.
This session aims to explore in a comparative perspective how early modern cities have been dealing with disasters, especially in terms of both material and spiritual practices. For its general approach, the panel is part of a historiographical current that has been consolidated in recent decades, and which aims to examine disasters from the double view of management and the transmission of memory. In this sense, particularly useful has been the collaboration of both coordinators of this session to the European research project DisComPoSE – Disaster, Communication and Politics in South Western Europe (http://discompose.unina.it/) based at the University of Naples Federico II. This session aims to continue the work of this project by proposing a comparative analysis between different urban contexts in time of catastrophes.
Session 32
Main Session
Urban Histories in Motion. Cartographic, Artistic, and Historiographical Representations of the City within Early Modern Intellectual Networks
Organizers
- Fernando Loffredo
SUNY Stony Brook – Max Planck Partner Group “Empires, Environments, Objects” - Ida Mauro
Universitat de Barcelona - Tanja Michalsky
Bibliotheca Hertziana – Max Planck Institute for Art History
Keywords
Early Modern urban descriptions; cartographic representations; connected histories; text-image dialogues; intellectual urban networks.
Synthesis
This session aims to explore how cities were represented in Early Modern times through
cartographic, artistic, literary, and historiographical forms, and how these representations were often embedded in the network of traveling intellectuals. By situating these knotted dynamics within a global framework, we aim to trace the motion of people, ideas, and urban imaginaries across the Mediterranean and beyond, also looking at transatlantic and transpacific circulations.
Presentation
This session seeks to explore how urban spaces were represented, conceptualized, and experienced between the 15th and 18th centuries. We are particularly interested in examining the relationship between visual and textual representations of the city —including texts, images, cartographies, and urban descriptions— and the movement of people, ideas, and knowledge across the Mediterranean and beyond. Thereby, our aim is to investigate how both physical and conceptual motion shaped the ways in which cities were understood, described, and imagined in the early modern times. We use motion not only to refer to the displacement of individuals across different territories, but also as a conceptual lens to examine the circulation of urban knowledge and the formation of relational representation of the urban landscape. In doing so, we think that cities were shaped by learned transregional itineraries through textual and visual productions. The movements of erudites, artists, diplomats, and merchants forged circuits in which the city became both a lived space and a representational object, often mapped, narrated, and ordered. We are particularly interested in how urban descriptions–artistic, literary, historiographical, and cartographic–can be seen as tools for shaping both social imaginaries and political order. These representations often reveal how early modern cities were understood as expressions of social structure and political identity. By placing emphasis on connected histories, we seek to trace the epistemic, visual, and textual threads that linked cities across frontiers. This panel aims to bring together contributions that explore how cities were imagined as connected spaces, how antiquity was invoked in public urban contexts, and how writing about the past functioned as a political discourse in civic life. In doing so, this session not only foregrounds early modern urban experiences and representations but also brings up a broader geographical frame to include transimperial, transatlantic, and transmediterranean circuits of knowledge and information. We welcome both case studies and comparative proposals revolving around the following topics:
– Cities as connected spaces. Connected histories of learned communities and intellectual networks across political and cultural frontiers.
– The city and the world. Thinking the global not as a backdrop, but as a condition of early modern urban culture by examining individuals who lived between different urban frameworks to trace transregional narratives.
– Cities along waterbodies. The relationship between the connectivity of specific cities marked by their natural state close to a body of water.
– History in motion. Urban historiography and memory as political discourse in a comparative perspective.
– Imagined cartographies. Tracing symbolic organization of urban spaces through texts, maps and vistas.
– Urban cartouches. Exploring the dialogue between text and image in the city representations centered in the historical narratives.
Session 33
Specialist Session
From Chroniclers to Citizen Scientists. The Long-durée of Lay Research in Urban History, 17th – 21st Centuries
Organizers
- Roey Sweet
University of Leicester - Sebastian Haumann
Paris Lodron Universität Salzburg
Keywords
lay research, history of historiography, citizen science
Synthesis
Current debates on Citizen Science have sparked a new interest in the tradition of non-academic engagement in urban history. This session will develop a long-durée perspective on the many, and changing forms of lay research since the 17th century. It will address recurring questions about non-academic contributions to urban historiography.
Presentation
Recent debates on Citizen Science have discussed the innovative potential of involving lay researchers in knowledge production. However, in urban history non-academic engagement has a long-standing tradition that even predates the emergence of urban history as an academic discipline. Chroniclers of the 17th century, antiquarians of the 18th century, history associations of the 19th century or the history workshop movement of the late 20th century, have all been vital in shaping the understanding of the urban past. With this session we aim to bring together papers on these many, and changing forms of lay research to open up a long-durée perspective on the history of urban historiography beyond academia.
Adopting a long-durée perspective the following questions will be helpful to come to terms with the changing character of lay research as well as its persistency throughout the centuries:
• How have research approaches beyond academia changed over time and how are these approaches connected? What kind of sources, methodologies and theories were used to substantiate claims about the past? How was the relevance of research objectives established, and how did this relate to the social background of those involved?
• How was lay research situated in a broader field of knowledge production? How did it relate to the emergence of professional academic research on urban history – through boundary-making or interaction and entanglement with academic practice? Which interdisciplinary connections into fields such as archaeology, architecture or geography were important to lay research throughout the centuries?
• How can lay “research” be defined vis-à-vis broader concepts of making sense of the past, such as historical culture or urban heritage, which also regularly involve non-academic actors? Does “research” entail a certain rigor of reasoning, certain modes of presenting knowledge or is it tied to certain institutions, which set the practice of “research” apart from other modes of remembering or narrating urban history?
With these questions we aim to advance the reflection on the history of urban historiography. It is often said that lay research has made an important contribution but that contribution has rarely been analyzed. In particular, the long-term perspective, i.e. the systematic comparison of non-academic research throughout the centuries, still largely remains a blind spot. Ultimately, insights from the long-durée may also hold lessons for current debates on Citizen Science.
Session 34
Main Session
Narrated cityscape: Personally recorded routes versus itinerary guidebooks and travel manuals
Organizers
- Eva Chodějovská
Moravian Library / Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia - Keti Lelo
Roma Tre University, Rome
Keywords
15th-18th century (Early Modern Europe); urban itineraries; chorographies; mobility; digital humanities
Synthesis
Among spatial representations such as vedute, texts, and maps, special attention is paid to those providing spatial information as an itinerary. We aim at comparison of an individual´s experience and topographical approach (private records vs. chorographies and guidebooks) provided in a form of a deep mapping, 3D models, and GIS-based mappings.
Presentation
In the heterogeneous category of pre-modern representations of the city, the interest for travellers’ itineraries often remains limited to narrow descriptions.
We understand the “narration” as either visual, verbal, or symbolic. Thus, visual representations of cityscape – vedute, and their series, texts, and maps are included, as well as their merges, generally labelled as chorographies (L. Nuti; or, in Central European historiography: historical-geographical-topographical books), or wayfinding literature (referring mostly to guidebooks and travel/postal manuals). However, among them, special focus will be paid to itinerary narration, e.g., those that provide spatial information to their readers in the form of a series of stops, an itinerary.
Such “narrations” were produced as private records, reflecting thus mental map of a foreigner in a city, others were intended for the general public and aimed at being an objective offer for incomers (visitors). The level of detail may vary. When visualized, these descriptions of routes as well as suggested itineraries feature lines winding through the city, as well as points where connecting lines are disputed and finding them is a matter for further research.
Many of the “narrations” have not yet been analysed by scholars in detail, but most importantly, they are still being studied as isolated items lacking in proper or even original context. The private records receive the attention of historians dealing with the history of travel (a category of historical sources referred to as ego documents (in the context of the history of travel recently e.g. Filip Wolański and Aleksandra Ziober after J. Presser, resp. W. Shultze) or historians of literature (DIGEOCAT+Lib. Project: https://digeocat.upol.cz/), while those intended for general public and wanted and sponsored by institutions attract mostly the attention of historical geographers and topographers.
This session generally aims to provide space for comparison and confrontation of an individual´s experience and topographical approach towards capturing cityscape, preferring perspectives that allow us to take into account the multiple aspects at play. We also welcome papers that will address newly discovered and unknown travel accounts and city guidebooks or topographical books, as well as those aiming at integration city plans into the broader context of connected (textual) archival material from which they have been removed in the past decades of fascination with early maps. The session is particularly (not exclusively) designed for those aiming at visualisation of historical information, those applying concepts of deep mapping, 3D modelling of virtual-past realities, and GIS.
Session 35
Round Table
Sound and processional practices in Early Modern Mediterranean cities
Organizers
- Tess Knighton
ICREA, Universitat de Barcelona - Ascensión Mazuela-Anguita
Universidad de Granada
Keywords
processions, sound spaces, urban musicology, Mediterranean cities, Modern Age
Synthesis
This round table presents recent research into the role of sound in processional practice in several Mediterranean cities in the early modern period, with the purpose of providing a comparative perspective which allows us to assess differences and similarities. Case-studies from Spain, France, Italy, Croatia and Turkey will be discussed.
Presentation
This session aims to bring together scholars from all over Europe to present recent research into different aspects of the role of sound in processional practice in early modern Mediterranean cities. The focus will be on discussion of city networks in the context of an interdisciplinary approach, to identify which areas and themes have been and remain to be explored. Processions were performative acts which allow us to analyse social structures, cultural processes and the sonic experience of urban life. The study of processions that were celebrated in the past presents a series of methodological challenges, such as the ways in which historians can obtain information about performative moments.
With the purpose of exploring city networks in connection to these urban rituals, this round table will provide a comparative approach by presenting recent research into the role of sound in processional practices in several Mediterranean cities in the early modern period. Contributions on cities in Spain, France, Italy, Croatia and Turkey will allow us to assess differences and similarities and to explore the establishment of cultural networks between Mediterranean urban centres.
This round table is related to the objectives of the project ‘Soundspace. How Processions Moved: Sound and Space in the Performance of Urban Ritual, c.1400-c.1700’ (HERC-2021-ADG no.101054069).
Session 36
Specialist Session
Liturgical Streets: Urban Processions and Religious Practices in Iberian Cities (15th–19th Centuries)
Organizers
- Nil Rider Enrique
Catedral de Barcelona – Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Carles Freixes Codina
Museu Diocesà i Comarcal de Solsona, Solsona - Daniel Vilarrúbias Cuadras
Arxiu Comarcal de l’Alt Penedès, Vilafranca del Penedès
Keywords
urban ritual, sacred topology, urban liturgy, civic-religious relations, symbolic power
Synthesis
This session explores religious processions as urban liturgy and symbolic power in the cities, with a focus on cathedral rituals and feasting in Spain, transforming urban space. It invites case studies comparative perspectives, and interdisciplinary approaches on how processions shaped civic relations, festive calendars, and urban space
Presentation
How did urban processions shape civic identity, religious experience, and the use of public space in early modern and modern Iberian cities? This session explores processions as complex social, religious, and political events that intertwined sacred ritual with urban life, particularly in Catalonia and the city of Toledo, while encouraging comparative approaches across the Iberian Peninsula and beyond.
Religious processions were a defining feature of the urban landscape in the Iberian world, marking key points of the liturgical calendar, responding to crises (such as plague or war), and asserting the authority of local institutions—from cathedral chapters to confraternities and civic councils. These events mobilized the population, reconfigured the spatial logic of cities, and created performative spaces of devotion, hierarchy, and community.
This session invites scholars to examine the multi-layered dimensions of urban processions between the 15th and 19th centuries, a period of intense religious transformation, political centralization, and urban change. Key issues include:
• The material and spatial organization of processions and their urban itineraries
• The role of confraternities and guilds in shaping religious practices
• Confessional conflicts and processions as tools of control or resistance
• Gender, participation, and exclusion in public ritual
• Iconography, soundscapes, and sensory experiences of processional liturgy
• Civic-religious negotiations: town councils, bishops, and royal powers
• Comparative perspectives with colonial urban centres in the Americas or elsewhere
Recent historiography has renewed interest in the religious life of cities as a key lens to understand urban culture, identity-making, and collective memory. Studies of processions intersect with current concerns in urban history—such as spatial practices, the politics of public space, ritualized forms of governance, and the embodied experience of the city.
By focusing on Iberian cities, this session highlights a region rich in archival material and ritual diversity, while opening space for transnational comparisons. We aim to bring together scholars from various disciplines—urban historians, historians of religion, art historians, and anthropologists—to foster a dialogue on how processions functioned as urban phenomena with long-lasting cultural and spatial legacies.
We particularly welcome proposals that adopt a comparative framework (across regions or periods), analyze lesser-known urban centres, or connect Iberian practices with those in colonial or Mediterranean contexts. The session aligns with the conference’s broader themes of cities, rituals, and identities in historical perspective.
Session 37
Specialist Session
Urban networks put to the test of the “glocal”: port cities and globalisation in the modern era, 16th-19th centuries
Organizers
- Caroline Le Mao
Université Bordeaux Montaigne -Centre d’Etudes des Mondes Moderne et Contemporain (UR 2958) - Gábor Czoch
Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Atelier Department for Interdisciplinary History
Keywords
glocal, port cities, globalisation, urban transformation
Synthesis
This panel aims to explore, through the concept of the ‘glocal’, the ways in which European port cities in the modern era become places where globalisation is experienced. How does it change the urban landscapes, the social practices and the material culture of the inhabitants? How maritime and port networks reconfigure urban life?
Presentation
This panel proposes to examine urban networks in the modern era through a renewed methodological approach inspired by the concept of the “glocal”. Forged at the crossroads of reflections on globalisation and territorial anchorage, the “glocal” invites us to think about the global and the local together, from a microstoria perspective, highlighting the way in which global dynamics are embodied in particular urban contexts. From this perspective, it is also a question of mobilising the methodological contributions of connected histories and those of the change of scale. As Paul Ricoeur wrote, ‘At each scale we see things that we don’t see at another, and each vision has its own right’.
In this respect, the European port cities of the sixteenth to nineteenth centuries – but also, where appropriate, their colonial and non-European counterparts – offer a privileged vantage point. As crossroads for the movement of people, goods, knowledge and representations, they were dense nodes in the networks of early globalisation. But beyond their role in flows, these cities must also be seen as places of transformation. How do they invite the whole world in? How do objects, products, tastes and styles from other parts of the world become integrated, transformed and recomposed in the social practices, material cultures and sensitive universes of the inhabitants?
By bringing together urban history, cultural history and material history, this panel aims to explore the ways in which these port cities become places where globalisation is experienced. In particular, we will be looking at changes in urban landscapes, domestic interiors, elite sociability and new forms of consumption, as well as the resistance and tensions that these transformations may give rise to. Ultimately, the aim is to understand how maritime and port networks, by linking the near and the far, are helping to reconfigure urban life.
Papers may focus on case studies or adopt a more comparative or methodological approach. Particular attention will be paid to connections between Europe and other cultural areas, in order to ensure that this panel is fully integrated into a transnational and connected perspective.
Session 38
Main Session
Commodities, commerce, and urban network in the pre-modern world and the colonial expansion
Organizers
- Phil Withington
University of Sheffield - Maarten Prak
Utrecht University
Keywords
commodities, missions, merchants, colonialism, networks
Synthesis
This session examines the way in which urban networks enabled commercial and colonial expansion by Europeans before the nineteenth century. Focusing on a range of cities and geo-historical contexts, it is especially concerned with the development of commodity flows and systems and the people responsible for them.
Presentation
This panel explores the relationship between ports, towns, and cities and the establishment of ‘commodity systems’ (to borrow a term from food sociologists): i.e., the way natural or manufactured goods were produced, exchanged, trafficked and consumed for profit over space and time. While the flow of commodities has received increasing amounts of historiographical attention over recent years, the urban dynamics of these flows – and, indeed, the importance of commodities to the development of urban networks and urbanisation – is much less appreciated. By putting this relationship centre stage the panel will examine how urban networks drove commercial and colonial expansion by Europeans in the pre-modern world.
This panel accordingly encourages presenters to approach this relationship from a variety of perspectives and within a range of geo-historical contexts. Themes will include the kinds of people involved in constructing and sustaining urban commodity networks (be they missionaries, merchants, or recently freed black women) and the urban-based practices by which they did so; the nature and extent of the networks enjoyed by particular ports and cities, both across Europe and globally; the kinds of institutional developments within towns and cities that facilitated the production, distribution and consumption of commodities; the life-cycle of specific commodities across urban networks, and so the role of commodities in sustaining and legitimising commercial and colonial expansion.
As this suggests, the aim of the panel is to encourage comparisons and synergies across disciplines and geographies while maintaining the core relationships – between urban networks, commodity flows, and European colonial and commercial expansion – in sight.
Session 39
Main Session
Lodging practices and networks of work, migration, and sociability. Long term perspectives across European cities and beyond (1500-present)
Organizers
- Hilde Greefs
University of Antwerp - Jasper Segerink
University of Antwerp - Rosa Salzberg
University of Trento
Keywords
lodging, migration, housing, urbanisation
Synthesis
Lodging has long shaped urban networks through mobility, labour migration, and social exchange. Yet its history remains fragmented. This session explores the long-term evolution of urban lodging, tracing its changing forms and roles in cities across Europe and beyond.
Presentation
Lodging has long played a crucial role in urban networks, fostering mobility, labour migration, and social exchanges. In its broadest sense, lodging includes the renting of rooms or beds for short or interim periods in the houses of hosts, either commercial or private. The practice has a long history and has taken various forms, yet crucially we lack insights into its continuities and changes across time and space. Historical research on lodging has often remained fragmented, either confined to specific regions or periods, or footnoted within broader studies of housing, migration, and urban poverty. This session aims to explore urban lodging as a historical phenomenon over the long term, examining its changing roles and functions in urban networks across Europe and beyond.
The session is guided by the leading question: How have lodgers and their hosts shaped urban environments, and how have these environments, in turn, shaped lodging practices over time? Addressing this question requires an examination of lodging not only as a form of housing but as an integral part of urban networks of work, migration, and sociability. In so doing, the session contributes to recent debates seeking to structurally incorporate transient populations and non-normative household constellations in urban histories. Given the conference’s theme, the session approaches lodgers and their hosts as crucial agents in broader urban networks, and aims to foster comparative perspectives from different regions and time periods to identify similarities and differences.
We particularly welcome papers addressing the following themes:
• Lodgers and their hosts as agents in urban labour and migration networks
• Lodging environments: their materiality and spatial organisation
• Social profiles and dynamics: gender, ethnicity, and class
• Lodging and urban crises: housing shortages, labour crises and forced migrations
• Lodging beyond Europe: case studies from colonial, industrial, and postcolonial contexts
By bringing together scholars working on different geographical and temporal contexts, this session aims to foster new comparative perspectives on the long-term history of lodging. In doing so, it seeks to contribute to broader debates on urbanisation, migration, and housing, while situating lodging at the intersection of cities’ networks and their transnational histories.
Session 40
Main Session
Gateways to Work in Urban Spaces: Women’s Strategies, Networks, Institutions, and Mobilities (18th–20th Century)
Organizers
- Céline Mutos-Xicola
Universitat de Barcelona - Montserrat Duch
Universitat de Tarragona - Manuela Martini
Université de Lyon Lumière-2 - Cristina Borderías
Universitat de Barcelona
Keywords
women, labour market, networks, institutions, mobility
Synthesis
This session explores women’s access to urban labor markets (18th-20th century), examining strategies, networks, and institutions. It addresses control policies, skill acquisition, career mobility, and urban transformations, highlighting comparative and transnational perspectives on women’s impact on urban economies.
Presentation
Urban labor markets have historically shaped and been shaped by women’s access to work, their professional trajectories, and their ability to sustain and progress within urban environments. This panel invites contributions that explore the multiple pathways through which women entered and navigated urban labor markets, considering both the mechanisms of access and the skills and knowledge required to participate in different types of urban economies.
Additionally, we aim to examine how women’s work contributed to transforming urban spaces themselves. The presence of female labor influenced the design of urban infrastructure, the creation of institutions, and the development of services tailored to the needs of a working female population. How did cities adapt to the presence of large numbers of female workers? How did women’s participation in different sectors—industrial, commercial, service-based—shape the urban environment?
Contributions may address the following themes:
• Mechanisms of access to urban labor markets: The role of family ties, friendship networks, migration chains, employer recruitment strategies, guilds, professional associations, or charitable institutions in shaping work opportunities.
• Control, exclusion, and restriction policies: Historical and institutional mechanisms of control, expulsion, and veto affecting specific groups of women in their access to particular occupations. This may include legal barriers, moral regulations, social stigmatization, or policies limiting certain groups (e.g., migrant women, lower-class women, or married women) from entering specific labor sectors.
• Education and skills acquisition: The training, apprenticeships, or informal learning processes necessary to work in industrial, commercial, or service-based urban economies.
• Mobility and career progression: How women adapted to urban labor demands, switched professions, or leveraged personal and institutional support to sustain long-term employment.
• Urban transformations and female labor: The impact of women’s work on urban infrastructure, including the development of nurseries, schools, daycare centers, hospitals, professional training centers, and other institutions supporting female workers.
• Comparative and transnational perspectives: Differences in women’s access to urban labor markets and their impact on city structures across regions, economic models, and historical contexts.
We welcome interdisciplinary, comparative, and transnational historical approaches that shed light on the diverse ways women engaged with and reshaped urban economies between the 18th and 20th centuries.
Session 41
Specialist Session
Migrant labour and the urban construction industry: between opportunity and exploitation (18th-20th centuries)
Organizers
- Matthijs Degraeve
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Adrià Velasco Peraire
University of Barcelona
Keywords
construction, migration, urbanisation, social mobility
Synthesis
The massive urban growth of the 18th-20th centuries was to a great extent realised by migrant construction workers, yet on whom little is known. Their histories are central to this panel, in which we question the circumstances and mechanisms that shaped migrant construction work, and paved the way for their upward and/or downward social mobility.
Presentation
The 18th to 20th centuries witnessed a major acceleration in the physical growth and transformation of cities. Historical research on the producers of urban space has however only started to transcend the realm of architects and designers, to also involve those who physically crafted the built environment, including contractors, artisans, and labourers (e.g., Ayres, 1998; Wall, 2013; Bertels et al., 2016). The many employment opportunities in urban construction attracted especially migrant workers, for whom some historians argued that construction provided an ‘entryway’ into local labour markets, as they grasped various opportunities to climb the socio-professional ladder: by learning on-the-job and acquiring skills, by establishing as self-employed entrepreneurs, and through ethnic and family ties which helped to overcome the risks and volatility of construction (Barjot and Colin, 2006; Martini, 2016). On the flipside, tales of exploitation, low wages, false self-employment and flexible recruitments have also been documented, suggesting that a lack of, or even downward social mobility for migrant labourers is intrinsic to the volatility of construction and to the possibilities for capitalist exploitation of building labour (Clarke, 1992; De Boeck et al., 2019).
In this panel we aim to disentangle this ambiguity on urban construction, migration, and social mobility by questioning which circumstances and mechanisms shaped migrant construction work, and paved the way for upward and/or downward social mobility. We particularly welcome papers that deal with one or more of the following questions:
– What were the social profiles of migrant workers in terms of skills, gender, age, networks, migration trajectories (rural-urban, urban-urban), etc? How did these profiles change over time?
– What shaped the relationships between migrant workers and locals and others in the construction industry (architects, contractors, local workers)?
– To what extent were the profiles and experiences of migrant workers influenced by changes in the scale and growth of the city, the organisation of the building process, the modernisation and professionalisation of construction practices, or the demands for the architecture and equipment of the domestic environment?
All of these factors produced new demands for building skills, but perhaps also possibilities for exploitation and proletarianisation. By tracing those, this panel wants to shed light on the different pathways for social mobility in urban construction, and how the industry mitigated or exacerbated urban inequalities more generally.
With Barcelona as UNESCO World Capital of Architecture 2026, the need to understand how the built urban environment came to be is especially timely. To make global and long-term comparisons, we welcome contributions on cities around the world between the 18th and 20th centuries, and from diverse disciplines with expertise in the historical production of the built environment.
Session 42
Main Session
Urbanities of Belonging: Emigres from East Central Europe in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Cities
Organizers
- Markian Prokopovych
Durham University - Katalin Straner
York St John University
Keywords
urban identity, urban networks, migration, modern Europe, global
Synthesis
This session seeks to examine the ways in which emigres from East Central Europe found new homes in cities outside of the region and how they were linked through urban networks and emerging identities in the period between the Napoleonic Wars and the fall of the Berlin Wall. The geographical scope includes but is not limited to Europe.
Presentation
This session seeks to examine the ways in which migrants from East Central Europe found new homes in cities outside of the region between the Napoleonic Wars and the fall of the Berlin Wall. The geographical scope includes, but is not limited to, Europe. While the networks of political exiles, intellectuals and other groups and their, often transitory, lives abroad have been largely analysed on national and international scales, it is often overlooked that these networks were often inter- and intra-urban, as was the sense of belonging to their new and old homes. It was through such urban networks that new professional and private relationships were established, and new centres of migrant activities emerged. The session also seeks to pay attention to the maintenance of links to home cities and the ways such links facilitated and/or restricted migrants’ adaptation to the new urban environments. To what extent were nineteenth- and twentieth century cities linked through migrant networks of political, intellectual, academic, cultural and leisure activity? How regional and/or international were such groups in each city and who did they include apart from the migrants themselves? How urban was the migrants’ new sense of belonging and did emigration turn some of them into true urbanites? How did such processes intersect with status, nationality, gender and age?
Session 43
Specialist Session
On Cities and Homeless Youths: All about Histories, Historiographies, Methodologies and Praxes of European Networks
Organizers
- Davide Landi
Politecnico di Milano - Fidel Meraz
University of the West of England - Yahya Lavaf-Pour
University of the West of England
Keywords
homeless youths; European region; urban/non-urban networks
Synthesis
In 2024, 700,000 diverse homeless youths across Europe highlighted enduring socio-urban challenges, prompting reflections on present & past European homeless youth networks & their urban & architectural correlates, urging a rethinking of our discipline to comprehend & address socio-urban inequalities, respectively, in past & present European cities
Presentation
In 2024, circa 700,000 homeless youth comprising a diverse population, including migrants and LGBTQIA+ youths with different experiences as a result of their ethnicity and histories of relations, lived in emergency lodging each night in Europe. An obvious socio-urban challenge exists, exposing underlying design, planning and governance weaknesses calling for a more inclusive and cohesive model.
This challenge is not new; single institutions, networks and cities have long attempted to solve it. While Montagu Burgoyne’s pastoral colony was a remote community for poor and criminal homeless youths where they could study and learn professional skills (1829, Potton, UK), for example; the Vlassky Spitalin, founded by migrants’ networks in Prague, was an urban cluster of buildings that provided shelter and training for poor and homeless young apprentices from across Europe, regardless of their nationality or religion (1601, Prague, Czech Republic). They did not necessarily portray a trend or universal phenomenon but suggested a correlation between single-handed and/or networks praxes and the spatial, historical, social and political dimensions of socio-urban inequalities.
The session, therefore, aims to engage with and interrogate the nexuses and divisions between single-handed and/or networks praxes, their historiographies and methodological traditions in Europe that have been syncretically inscribed in the long-established historical, political and social definitions of homeless youths and the way these definitions linked them to cites, their spaces and their policies as implied metaphors of urban inequalities and/or justices to trans-critically and trans-nationally question our discipline’s capacity to rethink its own canons as it currently exists. To say it the other way around, the session addresses the question: to what extent have historical networks praxes contributed to and/or tackled socio-urban inequalities for homeless youth in European cities of the past, establishing a legacy with contemporary European cities? At a time when urbanism joins the rest of the humanities in bringing marginalised, suppressed or minoritarian voices to the fore, such questions acquire new urgency in the making of past as well as contemporary Europe and its cities.
So, themes of the session are:
_ Histories and historiographies of migration, gender, and other marginalised, suppressed, minoritarian or unrepresented homeless youth groups and their networks;
_ Histories and historiographies of case studies – remote communities, urban building clusters, urban spaces, and policies for homeless youths, their groups and networks;
_ Innovative methodological approaches challenging canonical historiographies and histories to investigate homeless youths, their groups, networks and case studies;
_ Pedagogies questioning traditional historiographical and historical research, its teaching and dissemination, focusing on homeless youths, their groups, networks and case studies.
Session 44
Main Session
Urbanisation, policing and crime. The transnational establishment of modern urban police forces, 1789–1989
Organizers
- Daniel Oviedo Silva
Universidad Pública de Navarra - Assumpta Castillo Cañiz
Università degli Studi di Padova - Sergio Vaquero Martínez
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Keywords
urbanisation, police, crime, transnational policing, marginalisation.
Synthesis
This panel explores the relationship between processes of urbanisation and the formation of modern police forces. It also analyses the coexistence between state police institutions and municipal bodies, the transnational circulation of policing models and techniques, and the rise of urban crime.
Presentation
As political scientist Fabien Jobard has argued, “the police are the offspring of cities”. This panel explores the relationship between processes of urbanisation and the formation of modern police forces designed to respond to the challenges posed by urban life. Although no definitive consensus exists regarding the correlation between urban growth and the rise in criminal activity, the scholarly literature has shown that these processes often undermined traditional forms of social control. The partial dissolution of longstanding communities and rapid population growth complicated both the management of urban life and the maintenance of public order. The perceived threat posed by anonymous crowds fractured along multiple identity lines further fuelled anxieties, exposing the limitations of existing control mechanisms. In the context of state formation, urbanisation, and the criminalisation of certain behaviours, governments developed state security apparatuses that coexisted with municipal police forces, armed groups of civilians, and neighbourhood-based actors engaged in auxiliary surveillance activities.
The emergence of modern urban police forces responded to local causes and needs, yet was also shaped by transnational processes. Governments reformed their security forces by drawing inspiration from models established by foreign police bodies which were perceived as more advanced, such as the London Metropolitan Police. At the same time, the rise of international crime fostered cooperation and the exchange of information among police institutions across national borders, eventually leading to the creation of international police organisations. This circulation of policing knowledge and techniques laid the groundwork for a transnational sphere composed of institutions, networks, and actors operating beyond the confines of the nation-state.
This session seeks to analyse various experiences of police organisation and social control, emphasising the intersection of local, national, and transnational scales. It encompasses the entire modern era in order to examine case studies with different political systems. Adopting a global perspective, the session also aims to compare experiences from both Western societies and the Global South, with a focus on the relationships and transfers between distinct geographies. The session will prioritise the following themes:
a. The establishment of police institutions, apparatuses, and agents, and their relationship to the challenges posed by urbanisation processes.
b. The coexistence and tensions between state police forces and municipal bodies or private actors involved in surveillance activities.
c. The transnational circulation of policing models, knowledge, and techniques, and the emergence of international organisations and professional cooperation networks.
d. The rise of crime, the emergence of processes of social marginalisation, and the development of popular forms of resistance to authority.
Session 45
Main Session
Tracing urban inequalities in the past through census data and statistical sources. Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.
Organizers
- Rubén Pallol
Universidad Complutense de Madrid - José Luis Oyón
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Keywords
census and statistical data, social urban history, urban inequalities, urban segregation, social mobility
Synthesis
This panel discusses the use of census and other statistical sources to study the social impact of urbanization in late modern times. Three main issues will organize the debate: methodological questions on exploiting census data, different types of inequality and their intersectional analysis, and social mobility and its measurement across time.
Presentation
The proposed session aims to gather contributions from a broad geographical scope, using census data and statistical sources to study urban inequalities in the past. Since its origin as an academic discipline, urban history has relied on demographic sources, censuses, municipal registers, and other statistical information. The incessant innovation in data management and its visualization has opened new possibilities to address questions on measuring and representing the inequalities that urbanization brought in its deployment. On the other hand, analysis on urban inequalities have evolved since its first formulations in class terms, to incorporate other axes of division such as gender, race, national and ethnic origins or age. A balance on how these issues have been treated in different urban contexts, in Europe and beyond, would be useful to foster methodological exchange and ultimately design comparative and integrated analysis of different historical cities. For methodological purposes and trying to bring coherence to the session, the discussion will be limited to the statistical era, the Nineteenth and Twentieth centuries, when censuses and similar technologies became standardized tools for studying and controlling urban populations.
Papers in this session should address the broad question of how to measure and represent urban inequalities in the past upon statistical and demographic data. Four axes are proposed to develop more focused themes. Firstly, the presentation of sources, evaluating their possibilities to study urban social fabric in the past in quantitative and qualitative approaches. Reflections on the methodological treatment of data and its challenges will be especially welcomed. Secondly, the different types of inequality expressed on the urban landscape and the categories to organize and prospect statistical and demographical data. Papers in this section will present an intersectional analysis of urban inequalities and propose categories and methodologies that can foster comparative analysis. Equally, research on inequalities other than residential, considering different access to public space and city life, are invited. Finally, a third axis will focus on diachronic analysis in social mobility during urbanization. New techniques to compare populations across time and to produce longitudinal analysis of individuals can contribute to the classical but remaining debate on the urban context and its influence on living conditions and class formation. Papers exploring the particular conditions in which cities opened opportunities to social mobilities are encouraged. Ideal contributions to the panel will present entangled approaches to the three axes, relating particular sources and complex analysis on urban inequality. It is expected that papers proposed for the panel will not be limited to theoretical reflection and they present original research of case studies built upon significant empirical data.
Session 46
Main Session
Rethinking modern urban infrastructures in the light of the Anthropocene (19th/20th century)
Organizers
- Christoph Bernhardt
IRS Erkner / Humboldt University Berlin - Nathalie Roseau
École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, Laboratoire Techniques, Territoires, Sociétés
Keywords
Anthropocene, urban history, urban infrastructures, planetary perspectives, transdisciplinary
Synthesis
The transdisciplinary Anthropocene debate pays much attention to the role of the history of urbanisation for the earth system. Against this background the session will discuss new approaches in the study of urban infrastructures. Paper givers are asked to address issues related to the Anthropocene concept and to present empirical studies.
Presentation
The contribution, over the last three centuries, of urbanization processes (technical, social, economic, political, cultural) to the “Anthropocene” – that is to say, the alteration of the biosphere by human activities, which is showing dramatic consequences for the planetary environmental boundaries – calls for a rethinking of approaches and subfields of urban history through the prism of the Anthropocene. Although the term “Anthropocene” is contested in public and scientific debates, the transdisciplinary controversies on this issue over the past two decades can help to reformulate research questions to urban history and to innovate established concepts in urban political, cultural and environmental history. In this perspective, the session focuses on infrastructures, and invites to reexamine the emergence and ecological footprint of urban networks (water, mobility, energy, waste, etc.) in their spatial and material scales, their socio-political configurations, and their human and non-human agencies. Contributions, grounded in empirical research, are expected to promote the interference of the fields of urban history and Anthropocene issues.
We invite paper givers to critically address two key problems of research:
1. Which approaches and positions in the Anthropocene debate (e.g. from D. Chakrabarty`s work, or the “planetary boundary” and “great acceleration” concepts etc.), can help to generate new methods and insights in the field of urban infrastructures and to overcome challenges for empirical research, like “downscaling” of long-term planetary perspectives to regional histories of infrastructures?
2. Which new narratives and results can be developed through empirical research in this field, especially on the emergence and transfer of modern urban infrastructures on a global scale (by extension, colonization, renewal, etc), on their ambivalent characteristics (between promise and problem, depending on the scales, spaces, temporalities) and on their effects for the regional and planetary environment?
Key questions to be discussed:
1. Which concepts can help to bridge the gap between local and planetary perspectives, like “glocal” or “pars pro toto” research, strategies of “generalizing” empirical results etc.?
2. Which perspectives on the histories of infrastructures like urban ecology, urban metabolism, more-than-human approaches etc., are promising for attempts to innovate established socio-cultural and environmental research?
3. Which results of recent historical research address key questions of the transdisciplinary Anthropocene debate, like the relation of urbanisation, capitalism, industrialisation etc., and which are relevant for current political debates and concepts for the future?
We want to encourage scholars in the fields of urban history, urban anthropology, human geography and urban sociology to send in proposals which should focus on historical perspectives.
Session 47
Main Session
Translocal Infrastructures: Rethinking Modernities Across the Global South and Beyond, 19th-21st centuries
Organizers
- Stavroula Michael
University of Cyprus, U.Cy. - Georgia Daskalaki
Metropolitan College, Greece
Keywords
infrastructure, development, modernity, Global South
Synthesis
This session examines how infrastructure connects and transforms cities within and beyond Europe through colonial and postcolonial ties. We invite work on water, energy, transport, and waste systems that challenge Eurocentric narratives, highlighting their gendered, ecological, and political dimensions across time and space.
Presentation
This session explores the role of infrastructure in shaping urban networks within and beyond Europe, focusing on interrelations between cities in the Global South and their historical, political, and material ties to European urban centers. We invite contributions that foreground translocal and transhistorical accounts of infrastructural development as agents of connection, disconnection, and transformation — especially in regions historically marginalized in urban history and theory.
While dominant historiographies of European urbanization emphasize intra-European city networks, this session reframes such narratives through colonial, postcolonial, and peripheral infrastructural linkages. Infrastructures — from water and energy systems to transport, communication, and waste — have long shaped spatial assemblages that challenge core-periphery binaries. They mobilized not only resources, but also technologies, knowledges, labour systems, and environmental imaginaries across territories.
We draw on emerging frameworks including the Global Sunbelt perspective (Bozdogan, Pyla, Phokaides 2022), feminist environmental humanities (Neimanis 2017), and critical work on the gendered and colonial dimensions of water governance and climate crisis (Sultana 2022) to highlight the uneven, gendered, and ecologically embedded nature of infrastructural modernities. These challenge technocratic and Eurocentric narratives by emphasizing the situated struggles and knowledges embedded in material systems.
We particularly seek studies on infrastructures managing ‘unseen’ or alienated resources — such as water, electricity, data, or waste — in cities shaped by colonization, militarization, and state formation. Examples include dam-building projects in Cyprus and Greece funded by colonial and Cold War development schemes (e.g., USAID, UNDP, World Bank) or private American companies (see Kaika 2005), and how these reshaped land use, citizenship, labor, and environmental imaginaries. Other cases may address port cities like Piraeus, Alexandria, or Guangzhou, shaped by diasporic and extractive economies; or infrastructural entanglements of Chinese-financed megaprojects across Sub-Saharan Africa and Central Asia.
We welcome interdisciplinary approaches from urban history, political ecology, geography, and infrastructure studies. Comparative perspectives that span different world regions and timeframes — from 19th-century colonial engineering to 21st-century development imaginaries — are especially encouraged.
Our goal is to shift from top-down, high-modernist visions of infrastructure to more grounded, networked, and relational accounts of urbanization. In doing so, we seek to broaden the spatial and temporal dimensions of urban history and foreground the ways infrastructural modernities territorialize, reterritorialize, and connect cities’ physical and constructed geographies.
Session 48
Main Session
Suppliers of the World: Productive Urban Networks (1800-1950)
Organizers
- Melisa Pesoa
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya – Department of Urbanism, Territory and Landscape - Pablo Elinbaum
CONICET – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas / CEUR – Centro de Estudios Urbano Regionales
Keywords
network of cities, planetary urbanisation, hinterlands, productive cities, productive regions
Synthesis
This session examines the foundation of new settlements and the creation of infrastructures of circulation and exchange in emergent regions worldwide. The objective is to build a comparative approach between productive regions that are part of the process of making the hinterland of the entire planet available to the global market on a large scale
Presentation
During the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century, all the inland regions of the colonies and former colonies were systematically occupied in order to produce or extract a wide variety of raw materials to supply the international market. This regional operationalisation shaped the creation of countries as spaces for regulating global capital.
The urbanisation of these productive regions (understood as sub-national spaces dedicated to primary exploitation) is therefore an inescapable part of the planetary urbanisation. In this process, the hinterland of various countries is massively organised in the service of the global market. Consequently, these spaces respond to frameworks of international competition, which are mobilised by techno-economic paradigms that impose similar functional logics and spatial patterns in different contexts.
The process of urbanisation in the Americas, Africa, the Indian subcontinent, and Australia involved similar strategies of colonial urbanisation and operationalisation. These strategies were carried out by industrial powers or even by private logistics companies and freelance consultants, within the context of distinct techno-economic paradigms. This included exploring and recognising the land, establishing communication infrastructures, building new cities, and transferring workers to new workplaces. However, this process also entailed the gradual extermination of indigenous peoples and significant environmental change.
The colonisation of interior regions in these emergent territories, their organisation –conceived on a regional scale, from top to bottom– and their new role as operational landscapes significantly impacted on the modernisation of major cities, the establishment of distinct urban systems, as well as on the development of the international market and European countries. However, this process also imposed a new order on occupied territories and generated conflicts and inequalities that persist to this day.
This session aims to explore the urbanisation process in emerging regions worldwide between 1800 and 1950, adopting a comparative approach. We will examine the spatial configurations that emerged from this process, including the establishment of new settlements to support production and resource extraction networks, as well as the creation of circulation and exchange infrastructures that enabled these new settlements to be interconnected with each other and with other parts of the world. In doing so, we aim to contribute to urban history beyond major cities and capitals by shifting the focus to regions that have received less attention from the discipline. We also aim to highlight a frequently overlooked constellation of productive settlements that supply the world.
Session 49
Main Session
Railways and the consolidation of the urban network in Europe, in the 19th and 20th centuries
Organizers
- Thomas Thévenin
Université de Bourgogne - Bárbara Polo Martín
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Jordi Martí-Henneberg
Universitat de Lleida
Keywords
Urban history, railways, stations.
Synthesis
From 1830 to 1850, the first railway lines connecting cities, mining areas and ports took a step forward to become real networks. From then on, railway networks expanded dramatically in both Europe and the rest of the world, reaching a peak extension by 1910.
Presentation
From 1830 to 1850, the first railway lines connecting cities, mining areas and ports took a step forward to become real networks. From then on, railway networks expanded dramatically in both Europe and the rest of the world, reaching a peak extension by 1910. During this period, all the main cities became interconnected, ports were given the opportunity to expand their trade to inland areas, and industrial and agriculture products gained access to broader markets. Most medium-sized cities also gained access to rail services. As a result, an efficient new transport network was created in which cities were the main nodes.
Leading questions: what was the role played by cities in the configuration of the railway network? Was it established to connect urban areas or, in most cases, did cities grow thanks to the railway? Were railways the main factor that can explain transformations in urban morphology? What other considerations influenced these changes?.
Key issues:
– Countries had ports and cities before the railway era. To what extent did the railway network adapt to the previous structure or transform it?
– Did railways efficiently interconnect countries and create an international network that was independent of national borders?
– How have railways and stations determined the morphology of cities?
– How can GIS contribute to the analysis of the impact of railways on changes in urban morphological and the landscape?.
– What are the main difficulties that researchers encounter when studying the impact of railways?
– Have railways experienced changes because of new networks like roads?
Relevance at two scales:
– At the local scale, cartographic and other sources can be used to track changes in the urban fabric as a result of the appearance of railways. This can be analysed from 1830 (Liverpool – Manchester connection) to more recent periods when high-speed rail has given new energy to transport networks.
– At the national and continental scales, the railway network can help to explain the formation of urban networks.
Achievements: Both subjects need more development. Most studies have so far been devoted to specific cases. This session will help to establish a common methodology with which to explore both areas of research.
List of potential contributions:
– The role of port cities in the configuration of the rail network.
– How major changes to state borders after wars have affected their respective networks. This would mainly apply to Central Europe.
Session 50
Main Session
Port Communities in the Urban Context: labour, gender, identities and networks (19th–20th centuries)
Organizers
- Eduard Page
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and Universitat de Barcelona - Laura Caruso
Universidad Nacional de San Martín, CONICET - Mònica Borrel Cairol
Universitat de Barcelona
Keywords
port communities; port cities; urban identities; port labour; cultural frontiers
Synthesis
The session explores the comparative history of port communities during industrialization and the process of global market integration. Locally rooted yet globally connected, they developed distinct urban traits. We welcome papers that examine them through topics such as labor or gender relations, cultural representations, urban narratives or their transnational links.
Presentation
From the perspectives of urban, economic, and social history, port cities have often been understood as urban centers with distinctive features compared to other major cities. This characterization has been especially emphasized for the period of transition toward an industrial and globalized economy in the 19th and 20th centuries. The advent of steam navigation, the globalization of maritime trade, and the massive mobilization of resources for port modernization generated similar socioeconomic impacts in these cities. Demographically as well, their population growth was generally higher than national urban averages, driven by constant and large-scale migratory flows.
The development of these cities was accompanied by the consolidation of communities with a specific connection to the port. These communities developed social and cultural traits that set them apart from the rest of the urban population. They became spaces of encounter for different peoples and groups, places of exchange and movement where geographical, social, and identity borders were constructed and represented—where ethnic and cultural relations intertwined and gender relations took on specific forms. As territories of life and work, of belonging and identification, ports constituted communities both locally rooted and globally connected. These communities also developed unique relationships with their cities, often becoming protagonists of urban narratives that positioned them as peripheral or marginal spaces within the city imagined by political, social, and economic elites.
This session proposes to explore the comparative history of port communities during the processes of industrialization and globalization. It aims to foster a historiographical discussion that highlights port communities as key actors in late modern urban history. Despite their close ties to global flows of goods, people, and ideas, the internal configuration and articulation of these communities remain underexplored from a global perspective.
Two main lines of inquiry are encouraged: first, case studies of specific port communities addressing issues such as ethnicity, labor, marginalization, mobility, conflict, urban alterity, or neighborhood identity, as well as the experiences, representations, and identities shaped within each community; second, research examining connections, transfers, exchanges, and circulations between port communities across different world regions, including comparative approaches.
Key themes for this session include: labor and migration networks; ethnic diversity and gender relations; urban representations of ports and their inhabitants; policies of integration or exclusion; transnational links; and ports as spaces of cultural, social, and identity frontier.
Session 51
Specialist Session
Local urban community networks and peripheral modernisation in the modern times (ca. 1850-1939)
Organizers
- Aleksander Łupienko
T. Manteuffel Institute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences - Michał Wiśniewski
International Cultural Centre, Kraków - Kamil Śmiechowski
University of Łódź - Rafał Matyja
Kraków University of Economics, Department of Economic and Social History
Keywords
modernisation, urban communities, community networks, peripheries
Synthesis
Towns and cities were populated by people gathered in smaller-scale groupings such as local communities, bound by pre-existing estate bonds, religious creed, professional ties, elite networks or ethnicity. We would like to focus on the inner-city networks of communities as crucial social forces that played its autonomous role in modernisation of European peripheries.
Presentation
In our session we would like to look more closely at the phenomenon of local urban communities of which towns and cities in Europe consisted since time immemorial, and their transformation during the times of modernity. Modernisation is a catchphrase that describes a wide array of changes taking place since eighteenth through twentieth centuries that permeated deeply the physical environment and mentality, as well as states and local groupings. Peripheral regions tended to adopt modernisation later than the centre, though both terms―periphery and centre―are debatable and far from clear. There were many European peripheries, but―to be sure―local centres were located also within the peripheral regions, beaming around with capital, know-how and ideas; the insular character of modernisation on the periphery is a widely accepted idea. The scholarship has produced multiple different ways of analysing the urban modernisation, our proposal is to look at it at the local scale, answering to the question of how it affected peripheral localness. We would like to follow the grassroots view of urban history that turns away from e.g. the bottom-up approach and invites instead to analyse horizontal ties between social groupings, that is―their networks.
Communities gathered by means of symbols and ideas, much more than by brute force and social discipline. Instead of agreeing on the centrality of the category of nation during the ascending modernity, i.e. in the period of ca. 1850–1939, the session proposes to look at various non-mutually-excluding social groupings that formed urban society by building inner-city (sometimes also inter-city) networks that bound together different people and employed various ideas. This will give voice to people bound by their:
1) (still) pre-modern estate-based ties;
2) common religious creed;
3) professional belonging and corporations (artisans, officials, workers etc.);
4) belonging to the urban elites, which wielded power locally;
5) ethnicity and more broadly culture (including common language).
We would like to look at the transformations within these community networks and the ways their leaders (or people unconsciously performing that role) and members addressed modernisation―while still struggling for local influence and power. Additionally, we invite papers that focus on new types of communities emerging in the urban environment, i.e. modern associations that gathered members in pursuit of certain goals and visions.
The organising team include:
Michał Wiśniewski, Dr., International Cultural Centre in Krakow
Marek Świdrak, MA., International Cultural Centre in Krakow
Rafał Matyja, Professor, Cracow University of Economics, Department of Economic and Social History
Andrzej Laskowski, Professor, Cracow University of Economics, Department of Economic and Social History
Aleksander Łupienko, Associate Professor, T. Manteuffel Institute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences
Kamil Śmiechowski, Associate Professor, University of Łódź
Agata Łysakowska-Trzoss, Dr., T. Manteuffel Institute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences
Session 52
Specialist Session
Factory gardens and workers' gardens, 18th to 20th centuries
Organizers
- Jordi Diaz Callejo
Barcelona City Council. Urban Planning Department - Vicenç Casals
University of Barcelona - Maricarmen Tapia Gomez
University of Coruña
Keywords
gardening, vegetable garden, industrialism functionality, Landscape architecture
Synthesis
The session calls for the presentation of studies related to the construction of gardens in factories, including case studies and design proposals; the garden as a means of corporate promotion and brand prestige; as a response to the
hygienic and social problems of the Industrial Revolution; the role of vegetable gardens and workers’ food self-sufficiency; and the ontological aspects of factory gardens
Presentation
From the end of the 18th century, especially during the second half of the 19th and 20th centuries, one of the greatest economic, technological and social transformations in the history of mankind took place, which led to the transition from a rural economy based mainly on agriculture and trade to an urban, industrial and mechanised economy that extended to all areas of society.
Cities underwent a process of profound transformation and growth with the incorporation of new forms of production and trade. Great urban growth, the result of the demand for labour, facilitated the formation of two new social classes: the industrial bourgeoisie and the working class.
On the other hand, the revolutionary currents born after the French Revolution, the birth of the liberal states and the need for a response to the hygienic problems generated by the excessive urbanisation in European industrial cities led to the creation of urban gardens as places of relaxation and exhibition, giving rise to public parks and tree-lined walkways.
In this context, various initiatives aimed at improving the living conditions of the workers also emerged, including the creation of workers’ gardens and orchards in production centres, which sought not only to offer a space of balance between the harsh industrial reality and the human needs for green spaces, health and community, but also a space for recreation and food.
Recent historical work on green spaces has shown that the presence of gardens and orchards in the industrial environment is a rich and interesting reality that deserves attention. They should be interpreted as another component of the industrial heritage that has enriched cities and that in certain areas have transcended as spaces of opportunity, acquiring new urban perspectives.
Thef papers in this session will allow us to explore both the historical and current dimensions of this phenomenon of urban industry and its industrial peripheries. Also the introduction of gardens and green spaces in modern industrial sites and the new realities of greenwashing.
What role have gardens and orchards played from the beginning of industrialisation to the present day?
Potential topics may include:
Case studies of factory gardens; the typology and functionality of factory gardens; the historical evolution of company gardens; their vision as spaces of refuge and refuge from adverse working conditions; the construction of gardens as an element of business promotion and brand prestige; the relationship between gardens, plants and the productive or industrial sector; the role of the garden in the design of factories; the aesthetic and social value of factory landscapes; what ornamental and edible plants were grown?, The workers’ vegetable gardens and food self-sufficiency; the industrial colony and the habitats with vegetables; Is it possible to consider factory gardening a phenomenon in decline as the factory grows in size and complexity?
Session 53
Main Session
(Re)discovering the Urban Corner Shop: the Histories of Interaction, Integration and Commerical Variety
Organizers
- Laura Kolbe
University of Helsinki - Aleksandra Stupar
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture
Keywords
urban corner, corner shop, neighbourhood, public space, interaction
Synthesis
The session will focus on the phenomenon of urban commercial(ized) corners – corner shops, which became widespread during the late 18th and early 19th century. Considering their various performances and meanings, but also contemporary (re)interpretations, a multidisciplinary insight into various aspects of this urban element is highlighted.
Presentation
The session will focus on the phenomenon of urban commercial(ized) corners – corner shops and stores which became widespread during the late 18th and early 19th century. Although similar typologies have been present in towns and cities since antiquity, this particular period generated a new house-over-shop building type which combined commercial and residential use. Situated within residential blocks, but with a distinctive corner position, these buildings developed a clear division between ground floor (commercial) and upper floors, dedicated to housing. This functional structure also reflected in the architectural expression of buildings, through a different treatment of the ground and the upper levels, their materialisation, as well as the position and the size of entrance.
In general, a corner store/shop represents a common and pervasive element of many historic neighbourhoods, characterised by its complex and changeable role and function. From small corner shops, laundries, shoemakers and barbershops, to groceries, cafes, restaurants, urban saloons and bars, these urban nodes have always brought vibrance and vitality to their residential surrounding. Frequently, they have acted as central urban symbols and/or economic drivers, supporting an active street life, consumerism and social interaction.
Considering the multiple performances and meanings of urban corner shops/stores through history, as well as their contemporary (re)interpretations, we are interested in a multidisciplinary insight into various aspects of this phenomenon, manifested in different cultural settings, both in small towns and large cities. Therefore, we encourage authors to perceive the role of urban corner shop/store as:
– territory, nexus, metaphor;
– perfected city form merging commercial, civic, and cultural activities;
– stage for connecting users with diverse social and ethnic backgrounds;
– cornerstone of community (sense of belonging, identity);
– node of urban networks;
– indicator, activator or generator of transformation.
The presentations could also highlight the specificities of urban corner shops in central business districts and their commercial variations and/or focus on the aspects of movement/circulation, interaction, integration, spatial and functional (re)structuring. Additional features could be studied – their environmental role, safety, specialisation, real-estate development, accessibility etc.
Session 54
Main Session
The Networked City: Between Collectivity and Individuality (19th-20th Centuries)
Organizers
- Stefan Couperus
University of Groningen - Tim Verlaan
University of Amsterdam
Keywords
individuality, urban governance, urban planning, social networks, citizenship
Synthesis
Urban historians emphasize cities as collective spaces, yet cities also enabled individual identities. This session examines individualization’s social, political, and spatial impacts on urban life (19th–20th centuries), exploring tensions between individuality and collectivity in governance, social networks, and spatial planning.
Presentation
Urban historians have predominantly viewed cities as spaces of collectivity. Scholarship has emphasized urban centres as sites where collective identities are formed and expressed, whether through class solidarity, ethnic communities, or grassroots civic engagement. Yet, as urban sociologists such as Georg Simmel and Louis Wirth observed long before the establishment of our field, cities also served as critical environments for the formation of individual identities. Throughout the 19th and 20th centuries they provided individuals ample opportunity and space for anonymity, autonomy, and self-expression.
We distinguish three spheres in which individualization profoundly impacted urban societies in the modern period: the social, the political, and the spatial. We believe individualization processes fundamentally shaped social networks and personal identities, changed how individual citizens navigated governance structures, and their interactions with the built environment.
This session aims to explore the social, political, and spatial dimensions of urban individuality, analyzing how tensions and interactions between collective and individual dynamics and imaginaires manifested themselves across diverse urban contexts and over time. We invite: 1) papers that analyze how cities have been constitutive for the individualization and emancipation of specific groups in urban societies and the emotions that are usually attached to these processes; 2) papers that investigate how urban governance began acknowledging individual rights and responsibilities, evident in the expanding discourse on urban citizenship, housing rights, personal privacy, and welfare provision; and 3) papers that focus on how urban planning and architectural practices increasingly catered to individual needs and desires.
Related exploratory questions include, but are not limited to:
• How did urban environments shape individual subjectivities in distinct cultural and historical contexts?
• In what ways did individualization challenge traditional forms of urban governance and community organization?
• How did architectural and spatial transformations reflect changing perceptions of individuality?
• To what extent did individualization reinforce or disrupt established social hierarchies and collective identities?
• How do historical processes of individualization in urban settings inform contemporary understandings of urban life, social policy, and spatial planning?
Session 55
Main Session
The Liberal City: Construction, Representation, Politics and Sociability in the Spanish Public and Private Space (1820-1930)
Organizers
- Rebeca Viguera
Universidad de la Rioja - Maria Llombart Huesca
Université Montpellier Paul Valery - Manuel Santirso
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Jordi Roca Vernet
Universitat de Barcelona
Keywords
liberal city, public space, representation,
Synthesis
During the long nineteenth century, public space was radically reconfigured. From an interdisciplinary perspective, this session seeks to examine the processes of transformation, representation, and reappropriation of public space as key dimensions in the development of social, political, and cultural life.
Presentation
The liberal age (1820–1930) radically reconfigured public and private spaces, turning it into a site of tension between hegemonic projects and counter-hegemonic practices. During this period, cities emerged as laboratories where the ideals of political and economic liberalism materialized, while simultaneously becoming centers of conflict, negotiation, and civic appropriation. From an interdisciplinary perspective, this session proposes to examine the processes of transformation, representation, and reappropriation of public and private spaces as key elements in the development of social, political, and cultural life.
This session will be organized around three thematic axes:
1. Public Space and Urban Transformation
Urbanization became one of the defining processes of the liberal era. In this section, we aim to analyze the transformation of public space in light of its new uses, meanings, and regulations, driven by liberal urban projects, hygienist reforms, and dynamics associated with industrialization. These transformations reflected new political and socioeconomic worldviews that sought to shape the modern city. At the same time, we are interested in exploring the responses and resistances of subaltern groups to attempts at hegemonizing urban land—whether through occupations, alternative cultural practices, or unplanned forms of inhabiting the city.
2. Private Space and Urban Transformation
The liberal revolution of the 19th century not only radically transformed the social, political, and legal foundations, but also altered relations within the elite. Tertulias, soirées, balls, and private concerts were nothing new, but it was the coexistence of the old aristocracy of blood and the new aristocracy of money. This was even more evident in public spectacles, particularly opera, but also in more localized ones, such as bullfighting. Urban space was the privileged stage for this transformation, in which 19th-century Spain and its cities were particularly active.
3. Representations of Urban Public Space
This axis focuses on the ways in which public space was represented and re-signified through visual, literary, and monumental narratives produced by both individuals and collectives. These representations are essential tools for understanding the various meanings attributed to the liberal city, as well as the connections between urban space, political cultures, and social identities. Special attention will be paid to the fractures of gender, class, and ethnicity that shaped access to and movement within public space, revealing tensions between inclusion and exclusion in the construction of urban modernity.
4. Public Space as a Stage for Mobilization and the Representation of Power.
The liberal period saw the consolidation of new forms of political mobilization, the emergence of novel collective subjects, and the reorganization of traditional sources of authority. This axis proposes to explore public space as a domain where both official ceremonies representing power and challenges to the established order were staged—whether peaceful or violent. Of particular interest are the dynamics of protest, celebration, commemoration, and the symbolic occupation of urban space, understood as forms of contestation over visibility and political legitimacy.
Session 56
Main Session
Infrastruggles and citizenship: Urban public services, 1840–1940
Organizers
- Magnus Linnarsson
Stockholm University, Stockholm - Greet De Block
University of Antwerp
Keywords
public services, urban politics, citizenship, infrastructure, welfare services
Synthesis
In the second half of the nineteenth-century, many urban public services were instituted. This meant a change in the nature of urban politics. Those who benefited from the new public services demanded a say in their organisation. Others were denied access to the city, and ‘infrastruggles’ became the battle ground to claim citizenship.
Presentation
In the second half of the nineteenth-century, cities across the continent and in the British Isles began to invest money and resources in various types of large-scale infrastructure systems. Local authorities and politicians gradually took greater responsibility in improving welfare and well-being of urban citizens by providing connections with new, efficient and healthy infrastructure networks, such as sewage systems, water supply systems, rail transportation and hospitals. Also, new forms of regulation and identification of citizens’ bodies and practices emerged in relation to these networks. In order to accomplish this feat, an increasing number of urban public services were instituted, particularly between 1840 and 1940. Municipal governments became providers of public goods, rather than mere administrators of social obligations.
These public services were the result of both political strife and a growing sense of social responsibility and control of city authorities. At the same time, the extension of public services and the access to the ‘welfare city’ opened new opportunities for bargaining and negotiating the right to the city. While an increasing number of urban residents were granted access to public provision, inaccessibility and the exclusion of population became more visible. This meant a change in the nature of politics and increased contestation and politization. Those who were connected and benefited from the new public services demanded a say in their organisation and management. Those who were not connected, were denied access to the city, and ‘infrastruggles’ became the battle ground to claim citizenship. Thus, problematisations of access to infrastructure was formative for the emerging features of citizenship
The period 1840–1940 encompasses a processual shift in what kind of public services were central to municipal authorities, from material infrastructures to more social, cultural and green services, and the session aims to discuss this shift. The session invites papers on various aspects of the expansion of urban public services in the period 1840–1940. We are particularly interested in papers dealing with both infrastructure and urban citizenship. Furthermore, we welcome papers addressing political conflicts about the expansion of public services, as well as papers addressing the topic of public or private administration of said services.
Session 57
Main Session
Knowledge in Interurban Transit: Networks, Actors and Agencies
Organizers
- Heidi Hein-Kircher
Martin Opitz Library and Ruhr University - Oliver Hochadel
Institució Milà i Fontanals (CSIC), Barcelona
Keywords
interurban knowledge exchange, knowledge in transit, best practices,
Synthesis
After 1850 an interurban knowledge exchange network emerged in Europe. Urban actors reached out for best practices. The section supposes that this exchange of urban ideas, strategies and models was extended globally. It uses the concepts of “transnational municipalism” of “knowledge in transit” for linking the presentations on case studies.
Presentation
Starting with the premise that one important feature of the modern city was that its urban space was marked by a high concentration of short-distance relations, multi-directional exchanges within and the acceleration of movement and communication, this section focusses on interurban knowledge exchange and the necessary networks. We assume that the “densification” within the city and the numerous social challenges were instrumental for the development of new fields of “applied urban knowledge” such as urban planning, hygiene and “cultural infrastructures” so that the inherent dynamic of the urban space and the production of applied urban knowledge entered a dialectic relationship. Hence, knowledge has become a key factor of urban development.
The section presumes that disregarding national borders, urban reformers in different cities became increasingly aware that they were facing similar problems with respect to public health and urban planning. Many city councils reached out to other cities all over Europe or even globally in order to modernize their own after best practices. Such solutions were sought after in the form of “best practices” from other urban contexts, which were considered as “recipes for success” in order to modernize the cityscape according to a city’s specific conditions. This distinctly pragmatic approach also promised to avoid errors that had been committed elsewhere, while being “late” or “backward” might turn out to be advantageous, and could be used by reformers rhetorically as political leverage to demand new technologies or urban planning concepts. After the mid of 19th century, an interurban network emerged in Europe (and beyond) in which urban knowledge in its different forms was being constantly exchanged.
We suppose that the European exchange of urban ideas, strategies and models for modernization was extended to a global scale. Thus, our section refers to the concept “transnational municipalism” as a linking question for all presentations. It posits that the knowledge that circulated in this interurban space is “knowledge in transit,” a concept from the history of science arguing against the top-down model (or deficit model) in science communication. Applied to urban history and transnational municipalism, “knowledge in transit” implies that urban knowledge is permanently altered, combined, hybridized and adapted to fit the specific needs of a city. This leads us to our central questions: Which models did the cities try to follow in their reforms? How did they inform themselves about the newest advances in, say, tuberculosis treatment or museum architecture? How was this applied urban knowledge produced, communicated and appropriated? How and by whom the interurban knowledge exchange network was created? Hence, the section calls for presentations on empirical case studies discussing the actors and their agencies as well as the created networks of interurban network of knowledge exchange in Europe and beyond.
Session 58
Specialist Session
Urban Planning and local Urban Strategies (1850-2025)
Organizers
- Javier Monclús Fraga
Universidad de Zaragoza - Sara Sucena
Universidade Fernando Pessoa. Porto
Keywords
urban Planning, urban strategies, local and international perspectives
Synthesis
To what extent can Urban Planning be considered a universal discipline, and how have local urban strategies shaped or or been interpreted by its global ambitions? This session explores the complex and evolving relationship between Urban Planning ideals and place-based urban strategies from the mid-19th century to the present.
Presentation
To what extent can Urban Planning be considered a universal discipline, and how have local urban strategies shaped or resisted its global ambitions? This session explores the complex and evolving relationship between Urban Planning ideals and place-based urban strategies from the mid-19th century to the present, emphasizing the interplay between theory and practice, universality and specificity, continuity and rupture. Urban History and Planning History, while often treated as parallel fields, periodically intersect in ways that critically reshape our understanding of cities. These intersections
become especially significant in light of contemporary global challenges—such as climate change, social inequality, and spatial injustice—which demand integrated and historically informed approaches to planning. This session calls for a reassessment of the theoretical frameworks, practical tools, and methodological approaches that have guided urban planning across diverse historical and geographical contexts. Key issues include the tension between modernist aspirations and local realities, the ideological underpinnings of planning models, and the risks of overlooking the cultural,
social, and environmental dimensions of urban life. While planning has often been associated with progress and modernization, critiques—such as those by Marshall Berman—highlight how it can unintentionally undermine the very qualities it seeks to preserve or enhance. Understanding this dynamic requires a critical lens on how planning has been theorized, legitimized, and contested in different times and places. This session aims to:
– Foster comparative perspectives on urban interventions across countries and continents.
– Examine how local contexts have modified, resisted, or reinterpreted global planning doctrines.
– Bridge historical inquiry with contemporary debates in urban theory and practice.
– Broaden the geographical scope of planning historiography beyond a Eurocentric framework.
Potential themes include:
– Transfers and adaptations of planning models across regions and empires
– The impact of colonial and postcolonial planning on local urban form
– Contradictions between planning rhetoric and on-the-ground realities
– Comparative case studies of urban strategies in the Global South and North
– Methodologies for integrating planning history into current urban policies
We welcome contributions that challenge assumptions, explore contradictions, and enrich our understanding of how planning processes—both visionary and flawed—have impacted urban life across space and time. Particularly encouraged are papers that engage in cross-country comparisons, focus on local traditions and planning strategies and offer new frameworks for understanding the transversality of planning practices.
Session 59
Main Session
Epidemics and Cities: Public Prevention, Management and Governability during the European Long 19th Century
Organizers
- Joana Maria Pujadas Mora
Open Univesity of Catalonia and Center for Demographic Studies (UAB) - Pere Salas Vives
University of Baleric Islands
Keywords
central government, local administration, cholera, yellow fever, plague
Synthesis
The session seeks to bring together papers that analyse the actions of central governments and local administrations in the prevention and management of epidemics between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, from urban and long-term historiographical perspectives, to assess how epidemic crises affected their governability.
Presentation
Past epidemics have demonstrated the critical importance of effective preparedness and early response by public institutions, as well as the need for international coordination—especially since the mid-19th century (Huber, 2020). Beyond the role of central governments, local administrations—both municipal and regional—have proven essential in mitigating and managing the effects of epidemics, particularly when non-pharmaceutical interventions are required, such as lockdowns, cordons sanitaires, quarantines, urban sanitation, and public hygiene measures. These responses challenge the more radical assumptions of neoliberalism, which tend to minimize the role of public administration in society (Zizek, 2020). In this context, cities emerge as key actors in the study of epidemics—not only due to their sanitary conditions, often shaped by poor hygiene linked to rapid urbanisation, but also because of their role in political leadership. Despite this dual importance, historiography has tended to address it only marginally, especially in the case of Southern European countries.
The 19th century was marked by the formation of the modern nation-state, whose administrative capacity still relied heavily on local governance. This period also witnessed accelerating economic globalisation and the expansion of capitalism, accompanied by the emergence of new epidemic diseases in Europe, such as yellow fever and cholera. In this context, economic development and public health often appeared to be in tension, although their relationship was far more complex than a simple opposition suggests. At the same time, this was a transitional era in medical thought and practice—from the dominance of Hippocratic principles to the rise of bacteriology. As a result, preventive public health measures, as previously discussed, played a crucial role in shaping the course of epidemics and mitigating their impact.
This session seeks to bring together papers that aim to analyse the actions of central government and local administration in the prevention and management of epidemics between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries from urban and long-term historiographical perspectives in order to determine how epidemic crises affected their governability. In this sense, the study of the provision of specific services (poverty alleviation, hospital provision, control of vagrants), special budgetary allocations or the analysis of disciplinary and patriotic discourses focused on the maintenance of good health will be of relevance. We will also consider proposals focusing on the organisation of health measures, whether of a contagionist nature (cordons, quarantines…) or hygienist (cleaning, disinfection, relocation of cemeteries, etc.). In addition, proposals aimed at studying the consequences of epidemics will be of great interest, whether they are demographic in nature, including the effects on mortality, or the evolution of health inequalities.
Session 60
Main Session
Cities & Corruption in European History, a comparative perspective (1850-present)
Organizers
- Maria Gemma Rubí-Casals
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Santiago de Miguel Salanova
Universidad Complutense de Madrid - Joan Torrents-Juncà
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Keywords
political corruption, urban history, clientelism, popular mobilisation, scandals, anti-corruption
Synthesis
From 1850, rapid urban growth and the need to provide services generated great economic opportunities and, in parallel, new scenarios for the corruption of local managers appeared. The session proposes to address, from the perspective of urban history, the question of good governance in European cities throughout the processes of democratisation.
Presentation
Since the 2010s, a network of European researchers has specialised in the study of the history of political corruption. This recent historiography considers corruption as a key phenomenon in the narrative of contemporary political history. In a comparative way, these European research groups of the so-called ‘new history of corruption’ have shared a series of common reflections on patronage and clientelistic relations, corruption scandals, public debates on good governance, whistleblowers, transparency, secrecy, the deep state and political distrust, among other issues. The usual comparative framework has been that of the nation-state, taking into account regional particularities and including some local cases.
Taking into account European urban spaces in a comparative perspective can provide new insights into the aforementioned reflections. From the mid-19th century onwards, rapid urban growth and the need to provide services for a growing population generated great economic opportunities and, at the same time, new scenarios for the corruption of local managers appeared. This workshop proposes to address, from the perspective of urban history, the question of good governance in European urban spaces throughout the processes of democratisation. Taking into account the different political and socio-economic contexts, we have chosen to establish a broad chronology (1850-1950).
To what extent has the democratisation of politics translated into a more virtuous way of exercising power and governing the city? In this sense, we propose to examine the political and social mobilisations aimed at eradicating the practices of political and administrative corruption in cities, the proposals for efficient management and municipalisation of public services in urban agglomerations, and the demands for transparency and accountability in municipal institutions. It is also interesting to know how the different political cultures and the new actors aspiring to govern cities dealt with these issues, as well as the debates that were generated around the allegations and scandals of corruption.
The main objective of this roundtable is to promote a comparative reflection between several case studies on the following issues:
– The formation of clientelist networks linked to municipal political groups. Favouritism practices.
– Fraud, embezzlement and administrative irregularities.
– Anti-corruption political and social mobilisations in cities.
– Demands for transparency and accountability in municipal political institutions.
– Debates, discourse and denunciations of corrupt practices and anti-corruption measures.
– Corruption scandals in the city and their repercussions on national politics.
– The representation of the ‘cursed’ city, stigmatised as corrupt.
– The morality of the virtuous city: honest politicians and civil servants.
– The city as a space for economic speculation.
Session 61
Main Session
Geopolitics and the spread of Art Nouveau in Europe
Organizers
- Ramon Graus
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya – Departament de Teoria i Història de l’Arquitectura i Tècniques de Comunicació - Mireia Freixa
Gracmon, Art History Departament. Universitat de Barcelona
Keywords
Art Nouveau, urban sphere, bourgeois cities, national identities, geopolitc
Synthesis
Art Nouveau was the first architectural movement to appear in Europe with a clear cosmopolitan ethos in the newly industrialising and bourgeois cities away from the great capitals. However, this process was linked to the construction of national
identities when the European map underwent profound changes. This session explores this contradiction in the urban sphere, describing the geopolitics of Art Nouveau.
Presentation
Art Nouveau exhibited European societies’ desire to create a new urban conception, based in a cosmopolitan and ornamental architecture that reflected the culture dominating fin-de-siècle mentalities. It has been defined as the style of the “”second”” cities because it was developed in bourgeois places, outside the European capitals. However, this process is linked to the construction of national identities when the European borders underwent profound changes. The emergence of new states such as Belgium, Serbia, Romania and Greece together with the unification of Germany and Italy coexisted with the last two continental European empires, the Russian and the Austro-Hungarian, which would disappear in the WWI. It has not been easy for historiography to construct – and understand – the Art Nouveau development. Stephan Tschudi Madsen, in 1956, was the first to organize a coherent historical account. According to him, two major trends could be defined: the first was developed between Brussels and Paris, with the second occurring in Glasgow and Vienna. Little by little, other names, Antoni Gaudí or Eliel Saarinen, are often added, but only as isolated geniuses. This narrative remained until 2000 when two exhibitions celebrated the centenary: Art Nouveau. 1890-1914 (Victoria & Albert Museum) and 1900 (Grand Palais). They incorporated some regions considered “peripheral,” but they did so as satellites to a historiographical account already established. However, it has been difficult to appreciate the wide geographical framework of the movement. This included Aveiro, Barcelona, Terrassa, Alesund, Milan, Palermo, Bad-Nauheim, Ljubljana, Riga, Prague, Helsinki, Budapest, Warsaw, Subotica, Oradea, Moscow and Tbilisi. Interest in studying these other centres was promoted by some researchers and by municipal or regional entities. Significant conferences in this regard were L’École de Nancy et les arts décoratifs en Europe (Nancy, 2000) and Idée nationale et architecture en Europe 1860-1919. Finland, Hongrie, Roumanie, Catalogne (Paris, 2006). Other recent contributions are La création des identités nationales Europe XVIIIe-XXe (2010) by Anne-Marie Thiessen, Art Nouveau and the Resistance to Germanization in Alsace-Lorraine, ca. 1890-1914 (2011) by Peter Clericuzio or “Art Nouveau and National Movements” (2023) by Marikit Taylor.
In view of the contributions of recent years, Art Nouveau was structured as a multiplicity of urban centres that interconnected with one another with astonishing dynamism. Geopolitics plays a crucial role. The objective will be to explore how this contradiction is expressed in the urban sphere suggesting papers such as
• Art Nouveau in search of freedom: the battle against building codes and other city ordinances
• Art Nouveau as a tool of bourgeois distinction and as a process of acculturation of working-class areas
• Cartography of the places of the city that promote the transnational consumption of art objects
• The image of the “Art Nouveau” city in trips and in the circulation of books and magazines
• Geopolitics of the neighbourhoods: International language versus national in small nations
• Museum areas as urban policy; educational and social museums
Session 62
Main Session
Making Cities Visible. Global Perspectives on Urban Image-Production and -Circulation (19th-20th centuries)
Organizers
- Christina Reimann
University of Gothenburg - Malte Zierenberg
Humboldt-University Berlin
Keywords
modern urbanity, visibility, visual discourses, circulation of visuals
Synthesis
Since the age of printmaking and boosted by photography, cities have been hubs for producing and distributing images locally and globally. This panel explores the urban imprint of the making of a ‘society of images’ by examining international visual discourses and local peculiarities, and by challenging Western-centric views on urban modernity.
Presentation
Ever since the age of printmaking, cities have been centres for the production and distribution of images of all kinds – not only for local, but also for translocal and transnational markets and publics. However, the late 19th century marked a turning point in several respects as photography revolutionised the production and distribution of photo-realistic images. Since then, we have been living in a society of images. This panel examines the specific urban imprint of this global development toward modern visual cultures, which took shape in different ways at different places. We consider the changing ways in which cities
became represented and looked at with the industrialization of image production and circulation, taking into account the integrating effects of international visual discourse as well as local peculiarities. Our panel explicitly invites studies on non-Western and peripheral/non-metropolitan urban contexts so to contribute to global historians’ challenging of Western-centred narratives of ‘urban modernity’. The panel’s six to seven papers explore the relationship between urbanity and visibility in Europe and beyond. They engage with the multifarious ways in which urban photographic iconography shaped (visual) discourses on (urban) modernity. In doing so, it also examines the different forms of invisibility that formed the flipside of hypervisibility, which often centred on specific forms of particularly metropolitan urban life. We take into special account that representations of modern urban space emerged in a context of changing gender identities and, especially, of transforming ideas of femininity that were embodied through an increased female mobility to and through cities worldwide.Among the questions the papers may address are:
What conditions and contexts did cities provide to shape this new imaging of the world?
Which (urban) actors shaped this development?
Which specific status did metropoles earn in this co-construction process of urban modernity and visual discourses?
How did other places beyond the metropolises foster the mediazation of the present?
What democratizing and which socially marginalizing effects did this process have?
Did the urban contexts of image production shape a specific urban bias in the description of society, which has persisted as a pattern of interpretation right up to the present day?
Session 63
Main Session
Changing emotions in changing cities. The emotions of customers and retailers in urbanising and globalising Europe (1850-1950)
Organizers
- A. M. G. Arnout (Anneleen)
Radboud University - Lea Leboissetier
University of Antwerp
Keywords
emotions, retailing, consumption, cities, urban networks
Synthesis
Ways of buying and selling changed dramatically as Europe urbanised. This session investigates urban retailing and consumption from the perspective of the history of emotions, with a focus on globalising urban networks of commodities, bottom-up perspectives, and retailer’s strategies.
Presentation
Since the 2010s, historians have argued that the 1850-1950 period saw an “emotionalisation” of practices surrounding buying and selling (Benger Alalouf & Illouz, 2019). In parallel, cities grew, becoming more diverse and globalised in the process. This session investigates these phenomena in close entanglements: it explores the emotional strategies, practices and experiences of both retailers and consumers in the context of an increasingly globally-interconnected and urban commercial landscape.
Emotions have long been mentioned in stories of urban retailing and shopping, but have rarely been properly studied. Furthermore, our existing knowledge is largely limited to the discourses of (male) urban elites. In this session we open up the perspective to investigate the emotional experiences and practices of broader groups of urban shoppers and retailers. We invite contributions that explore the emotional practices and experiences of (1) retailers and (2) consumers, as well as (3) the emotions that resulted from/encouraged the circulation of goods and people within increasingly complex and global urban networks.
Whenever possible, we invite scholars to approach these topics from the bottom up, focusing on agents (e.g. working-class and otherwise marginalised retailers and consumers) and on experiences that have thusfar been overlooked. Potential questions include but are not limited to:
Retailers and emotions
What emotional strategies did retailers, including small shopkeepers, hawkers and petty capitalists use to attract an increasingly varied pool of urban consumers? What kinds of (spatial, material and symbolic) tools were involved in these strategies? What sorts of emotions were used to advertise various commodities, and especially global and novelty goods reaching European urban markets? Did retailers appeal to feelings of modernity, tradition or exoticism? What emotions did they themselves experience in their interactions with their customers and other urban actors?
Consumer emotions
How did urbanity and urbanisation impact the emotions of consumers? How did the latter feel about consuming new imported goods? How did women, who were the subject of moral panics, actually feel as they went shopping? How does our view of working-class consumers change when we try find out what they themselves had to say about their experiences, rather than what middle- and upper-class commentators made of them?
Networked emotions
In what ways did the circulation of goods and people within the increasingly complex urban networks impact the retail and shopping landscape emotionally? How global did shopping and retail experiences become as cities became more interconnected, and what impact did this have on the circulation of emotional strategies and experiences between different towns? How did the origin of products impact both consumer experiences and retailers’ strategies to market them?
Session 64
Main Session
How did cities entertain their guests? Exploring the (dis)connections between tourism and entertainment industries, 1800-2000
Organizers
- Torsten Feys
Flanders Marine Institute - Gerrit Verhoeven
Universiteit Antwerpen - Jan Hein Furnée
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (The Netherlands)
Keywords
tourism, entertainment, leisure, gambling, resorts
Synthesis
This session explores the historical entanglements between tourism and entertainment. How crucial was entertainment to sell the city to tourists and conversely, how important were tourists for the development of entertainment industries in cities? Were certain activities, like gambling, more prone to being entangled with tourism than others?
Presentation
Since the nineteenth century, tourism and entertainment industries have become important pillars of the economy and are an integrated part of urban development. While in the last decades, research has been uncovering the rise of both industries (see e.g. Journal of Tourism History and Journal of Leisure Research), this call seeks to explore their historical entanglements. How important was entertainment to sell the city to tourists and how entangled were stakeholders of both industries? Conversely, how important were tourists for the development of entertainment industries in urban settings and were certain entertainment activities more prone to be entangled than others?
There are various angles to approach the subject, like urban planning, infrastructure, stakeholders, consumers, types of entertainment, etc. Casinos, for example, occupy a prominent place in some urban contexts, are marginalized in others, or are entirely absent. Their development in Europe is closely linked to that of spas and seaside resorts highlighting the entanglements between tourism and gambling as an entertainment activity. At the same time, gambling has long been a contested practice, which helps to explain its uneven development across different countries and urban settings. By zooming in on the networks sustaining the gambling industry in such resorts, like Ostend on the Belgian coast, we can observe how these networks were closely connected to local and national tourism promoters, while also being embedded in French seaside resorts and others beyond the European context, highlighting the transnational dimensions of these industries by 1900. Gambling was defended as a crucial component of Ostend’s entertainment and tourism industry alike, especially as it became a target of lawmakers to be restricted. Yet we still know very little about the historical symbiosis between gambling and tourism hubs of the first hour (mainly seaside resorts and spas for Europe), and how the obscure legal framework affected this entertainment in some urban contexts and not in others.
Gambling is just one example, and the call extends to look at how this symbiosis is applicable to other segments of the entertainment industry, like sports, theatre or music. How do differences in social class that these industries cater for affect this symbiosis? How much are these segments oriented towards tourists compared to locals? How do they reach and provide for these different consumers? When does the balance tilt towards overtourism for instance, when the atmosphere in football stadiums changes because too many local fans pass on their seats to tourists? What tensions do they trigger between industries, their consumers and stakeholders? By uncovering historical (dis)connections between tourism and entertainment this call aims to discern how these shaped and were shaped by urban contexts. We encourage case studies from around the globe to compare across cities, countries and continents.
Session 65
Main Session
Sexual Metropolitans? Intercity Networks and Shared Cultures of Sexuality in Modern Cities
Organizers
- Cristina de Pedro Álvarez
University of Basque Country - Romain Jaouen
Center for History at Sciences Po, Paris
Keywords
sexuality, urban culture, modern cities, intercity networks, circulation flows
Synthesis
This session offers to bring together historians and social scientists studying modern urban sexuality in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries around the following theme: is there a common sexual culture in large cities of the late modern and contemporary eras, and what role do inter-urban circulations and networks play in its development?
Presentation
After several decades of research, the history of sexuality has proved to be a good lens through which to observe the social and cultural implications of the processes of urbanisation that swept through Europe and the rest of the world between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Researchers have highlighted the role of large cities in the development of new forms of modern urban life and, particularly, in the emergence of new practices, notions, identities and common meanings related to intimacy, sexuality and affective relationships.
Historiography has shown how this urbanising process has generated important similarities between large cities located thousands of kilometres apart, although each had its own rhythms and particularities. As far as the field of the history of sexuality is concerned, although recent works are beginning to propose comparative/global/transnational analyses that seek to understand these similarities or common dynamics, research centred on a single city still prevails.
This session thus aims to bring together historians and other social scientists around a latent question in studies on urban history and the history of sexuality: the idea of a shared sexual culture between cities and urban centres, whose relations and links transcend the state or national framework. Beyond local specificities, is there a common substratum of shared practices, rituals, symbols, convictions or common meanings around sex and affective relations in modern metropolises? And if so, what role do circulations and networks connecting these cities play in the process?
Proposals that analyze the circulation of ideas, people and objects, as well as the degree to which these circulations constitute networks linking cities are particularly encouraged. The nineteenth and twentieth centuries will be specifically targeted, though proposals that challenge this chronological framework may be considered. Proposals that study connections between cities within or beyond Europe will be equally valuable to the discussion.
The session offers to address 5 axes:
1.The inter-city circulation of cultural references (dresscodes, visual cues, mannerisms) and productions (shows, performances, artforms) showcasing modern gender expressions and sexualities.
2. The connection between the development of urban leisure and sex tourism as a form of circulation connecting cities across borders.
3. The inter-city networks and circulation of sexual activists, and how the urban framework shapes their ideas, trajectories and militancy.
4. Inter-urban circulations linked to the sex market, whether from the point of view of sex providers (including forced or constrained displacements) or intermediaries (legal or illegal).
5. The circulation of sex-related products and artefacts (contraceptives, sex toys, etc.), and how merchants, companies and shopkeepers contribute to a connected urban material sexual culture.
Session 66
Round Table
Terraform: the interpretation of building as a practice of urbanization in the Anthropocene
Organizers
- Michiel Dehaene
Ghent University, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning - Tom Broes
Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ghent University - Rika Devos
Université Libre de Bruxelles, BATir - Carl Nightingale
SUNY, University at Buffalo
Keywords
practices of urbanization, construction history, politics of realization, metabolic practices
Synthesis
This round table explores the study of building as practices of urbanization. Taking the lead of the broad understanding of building as terraforming (Nightingale) we will unpack the way in which cities have shaped both the conditions of their own construction as well as the contingent pathways for their sustainable transformation.
Presentation
‘A theory of “the city” needs verbs’, that is how Nightingale summarizes the recommendation of Henri Lefebvre to focus on the study of ‘practices of urbanization’. His programmatic text ‘Our Urban Planet in Theory and History’ (2024) explores the study of global urban history in response to three intersecting debates: Global history, Planetary urbanization and the Anthropocene. One particular set of practices of urbanization is related to the verb ‘to build’, or more inclusively and expansively ‘to terraform’: “that is to rearrange materials from the
Earth’s biosphere and geosphere to meet the human purposes inherent in previous acts of energizing, situating and design” (p.25). In this round table we will explore the intersection between terraforming and urbanization. This entails understanding building as a terraforming process and understanding terraforming as a practice of urbanization. Urbanization, in other words, is not only a product of terraforming processes but also defines the conditions in which certain practices of terraforming rather than others can be realized. If today, for example, large parts of the city are built with the use of concrete technology, it is because of the conditions that have been put in place to do so. That factor is not only important in understanding how certain construction industries were able to occupy the position they did, it is also crucial to think about the ways in which urban construction may be made more sustainable, less extractive, more fair. In this round table we want to explore pathways for historical scholarship at the intersection of urban history and construction history emerging from the study of industrialized construction as a practice of urbanization:
– Opening up construction history’s historical focus on the construction site in order to study building and terraforming as a multi-sited practice encompassing the distributed logics of the
urban production chain.
– Studying urbanization in its dependency on localized practices acknowledging the site specific nature of the resourcing of land, labor (skills) and materials.
– The study of construction as a metabolic practice taking root in the reciprocal development of the construction sites and landscapes of resource extraction. (Hutton 2019, Augiseau & Barles 2017)
– The study of construction in light of “”the politics of realizatio”” (Harvey 2017) that makes urban construction possible in the first place.
– The historical analysis of alter-urbanisms that have managed politics of realization for the urban user and not at the service of the realization of capital. (Stromquist 2023) This includes the study of the practices of reuse and the ambiguous role of home improvement industries (Harris 2017) in enabling these practices.
– The study of the labor relations between those who build the city and those who inhabit the city and the specific urban forms these labor relations have engendered. (Wall, Clarke et.al. 2011, Clarke 2012, 2018)
Session 67
Main Session
Experiencing transition in modern urbanization
Organizers
- Kristian Aarup
University of Copenhagen - Mikkel Thelle
National Museum of Denmark - Tanja Vahtikari
Tampere University
Keywords
experience, 20th century urban change, urban-rural relationship, mobility, urban borders
Synthesis
With the notion of transition and experience as lenses, this session explores the processes of urban-rural changes within the framework of modern urbanization in the 20 th century. It challenges straightforward modernization narratives, fosters cross-regional comparisons, and invites diverse perspectives to explore the alternative routes that the focus on transition offers.
Presentation
Societies are continuously undergoing transitions, and societal transitions impact directly on people’s lived experiences, making the individual and societal transition a closely interweaved process. This session will use and explore the notion of transition as a perspective to emphasize and investigate the processes of urban-rural changes within the framework of modern urbanization in the 20 th century. Ongoing transition is a central and inevitable part of urbanization and has therefore often been seen in the light of the classic grand narrative concerning modernization, where people gradually move from rural areas to urban, modern ones; a route from the countryside through smaller towns or railway towns to bigger cities ending in metropolises. In this session we explore rural-urban transition as a more diverse phenomenon aiming to review the history of the 20 th century urbanization from the perspective of the multifaceted experiences of transition. A range of different transition themes can be discussed in this session, including but not limited to:
– How have rural-urban transitions influenced people’s lived experiences?
– How have people’s lived experiences of rural-urban transition become more widely shared experiences? How have people negotiated transition and urbanization experiences between different social groups and communities?
– In what ways have urban and rural experiences potentially conflicted when being “in transition”?
– What are the relations between short/long term and small/large scale transitions?
– How have rural-urban transitions shaped urban (and rural) spaces, and created spaces in between? What has characterized these “transition areas”?
– How have people’s lived experiences of transition, in turn, shaped sociocultural conditions, spaces and communities?
– “Transition” as a theoretical and methodological perspective to consider and present alternative routes to the grand narrative of modernization. In this session we understand experience as a social phenomenon including aspects of the shared, sensory, emotional, spatial etc. The overarching aim of this session is to shed light on different aspects, experiences and types of transition – hoping to nuance the existing conceptions of modernization, but also to draw comparisons across countries and traditions in the field. We invite papers from different regions in Europe and beyond.
Session 68
Main Session
From the Margins: Reimagining Urban Networks in Europe and Beyond
Organizers
- Jaroslav Ira
Charles University, Prague - Matti O. Hannikainen
University of Helsinki - Elisa-Maria Hiemer
Free University of Berlin
Keywords
urban networks; marginalized cities and towns; spatial asymmetries; urban hierarchies; networking practices
Synthesis
This session aims to explore, in a long-term and global perspective, how urban networks have been (re)imagined by marginalized towns and cities through a variety of real and imaginary practices, ranging from conforming to existing networks, to contesting unfair and asymmetrical networks, to proposing and creating alternative networks.
Presentation
Urban networks are often imagined through the lens of interconnected global cities—economic hubs, cultural capitals, and prime destinations. These dominant narratives emphasize flows between
privileged urban centers, reinforcing hierarchies of influence and visibility. But beyond these elite realms, how have marginalized urban settlements imagined and created their own forms of urban
connectivity? What kinds of networks have emerged from the peripheries, and how do they challenge, replicate, or reconfigure dominant models? This session explores networking practices through the lens of urban settlements that can be broadly conceptualized as marginalized—cities and towns that are, or have been, perceived as disconnected, downgraded, or overlooked. These may include small and medium-sized towns, cities in decline, places affected by regime change, shifting borders, or economic restructuring, as well as aspiring or “ordinary” cities seeking greater recognition or integration.
Building on scholarship in “comparative urbanism” and “ordinary cities” (e.g. J. Robinson), this session approaches urban networks not merely as measurable systems of flows, but as socially constructed and symbolically charged structures. Networks may enable mutually beneficial connections, but also reproduce asymmetries and hierarchies—linking prospering centers with dependent or subordinate peripheries. We are interested in how marginalized places attempt to reposition themselves within these structures: striving for inclusion in dominant networks, forming alternative ones, or contesting spatial injustices.
We invite papers that explore real or imagined practices of urban networking: strategies of (re)connection, (re)branding, coalition-building, knowledge-sharing, or symbolic alignment with more prominent nodes. We also welcome critical reflections on how these practices have been shaped by ruptures—political shifts, economic transformations, or technological change—as well as by planning ideologies, tourism, cultural narratives, or artistic representation. Contributions may address:
– Why and how urban places become marginalizedHow networking practices respond to or reframe that marginality
– How marginalized towns imagine or create more just urban networks
– What actors, tools, or narratives support or undermine such efforts
All time periods and geographic contexts are welcome. Case studies are welcome; comparative, long-term or transnational perspectives are particularly encouraged.
Session 69
Specialist Session
Crossing urban Planning cultures in time of conflict and reconciliation: views on continental Europe
Organizers
- Corinne Jaquand
ENSA Paris Belleville / IPRAUS - Olivier Ratouis
Paris Nanterre University / UMR CNRS 7218 LAVUE / Société Française d’Histoire Urbaine (SFHU) - Markus Tubbesing
Fachhochshule Potsdam Universität - Jannik Noeske
Fachhoschule Potsdam Universität
Keywords
conflict, war time, planning culture, transnational networks, circulation of ideas
Synthesis
The session proposes to study metropolitan planning in wartime on the European continent, from a transnational perspective covering the period from 1937 to 1945. We will focus on administrative and project contexts, distinguishing between national dynamics and those linked to military and occupation contingencies.
Presentation
The session proposes a reflection on the evolutions of modern architecture and urbanism in times of conflict on the European continent, in a transnational perspective covering the period from 1937 to 1945.
The aim of this approach is to consider how national urban planning traditions are shaped by conflict-related constraints during periods of escalation towards war and of occupation. National historiographies have long considered this period as a parenthesis in the circulation of ideas and models. In contrast to this approach, the perspective of the session involves an in-depth investigation of urban planning theories on a European scale, as well as an analysis of personal and institutional exchanges, technical transfers and expertises before and during World War II. In this sense, we make the assumption that the war constituted a moment of acceleration for the establishment of legislative and technical frameworks for urban and regional planning, as well as the outcome of previously decided infrastructure programs. In addition, there is the construction of new infrastructure geared towards military logistics and passive defense.
The session aims to reconstruct the interactions in urban planning, between occupied nations and occupying nations, in light of the constraints of administrative apparatus and the war economy. Presentations may focus on specific projects and on different scales (cities, regions) as well as on trajectories of architects and urban planners or even military and repressions situations that manifest themselves in space. In order to measure the continuities, ruptures and compromises, we propose to go back to the start of the global conflict, with the 1937 World’s Fair in Paris as our anchor point, with its urban planning congresses and national pavilions exhibiting the major metropolitan plans (Paris region, Greater Berlin, Greater Moscow). A number of research avenues can be explored:
– The importance given to urban and architectural modernism
– The effects and significance of foreign occupations
– Administrative, architectural and urban planning congresses
– Portraits of key actors and groups
– Architectural and urbanistic ruptures
– Completed as well as unfinished planned urban and infrastructure projects.
Session 70
Main Session
Sheltering the Displaced: Housing the ‘Other’ and the Making of the Post-war City
Organizers
- Marilena Kourniati
Ecole Nationale Supérieure d‘Architecture Paris la Villette, Research Laboratory Ahttep - Athina Vitopoulou
School of Architecture, City_Space_Flux Research Unit, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Keywords
Postwar Europe, migration, urban policies, housing models, postcolonial legacies, welfare
Synthesis
This session explores how post-war population movements reshaped European cities through categorized housing policies targeting newcomers. It examines their socio-political and spatial impacts, and investigates the dynamics of integration, segregation, and urban transformation.
Presentation
The decades following World War II saw major demographic shifts in Europe due to forced displacements, decolonization, labor migration, and rural-to-urban movement. These flows—sometimes encouraged by european states to support reconstruction and modernization—reshaped the social and spatial fabric of cities, generating urgent housing and infrastructure demands.
National and local authorities, often backed by international organizations, developed targeted housing policies for populations categorized along geopolitical, administrative, or ethnic lines. Social housing, initially for the working classes, was redefined to include schemes such as transitional settlements, hostels, camps, and shelters for “”foreigners””. These forms of housing institutionalized differentiated management of inhabitants, without however accounting for their social and cultural realities. Shaped by the circulation of architectural and planning paradigms—from modernism to welfare urbanism—such models contributed to hybrid or contested urban forms and reinforced segregationist logics, often inherited from colonial legacies, even in countries without direct colonial legacies.
In parallel, grassroots and activist responses proposed solidarity-based alternatives and challenged dominant representations of stigmatized housing forms.
This panel explores housing strategies and migrant housing forms developed in Europe after 1945, by states, cities, NGOs, and since the 1990s, city networks addressing migration. We invite contributions focusing on migrant housing forms – transitional shelters, camps, collective or informal housing- with attention to policy/model circulation, the socio-spatial inequalities produced, and integration into welfare systems, labor markets and development ideologies.
Axes of analysis:
-Continuities and contrasts between social housing and migrant-specific housing: postcolonial legacies, planning principles, architectural forms, and everyday practices.
-Plurality of actors and scales: role of states, cities, NGOs, international bodies (UNHCR, World Bank), and grassroots efforts in shaping housing categories.
-Urban and territorial policies: inclusion/exclusion of migrant housing in urban agendas; environmental conditions and vulnerabilities of such settlements.
-Appropriation and resistance: how inhabitants negotiate or reshape their environments; the role of activism and social sciences in transforming narratives.
We welcome comparative and multi-scalar approaches. This panel contributes to wider debates on migration, housing, and the transformation of post-war European cities—topics that remain politically charged today.
Session 71
Main Session
Making the city differently: urban struggles, circulations and networks after 1945
Organizers
- Céline VAZ
Université Polytechnique Hauts de France, Valenciennes - Baptiste Colin
France – Institute of Geoarchitecture, Université de Bretagne Occidentale (Brest), Laboratoire Géoarchitecture
Keywords
urban planning, criticism, activism, circulations, social movements
Synthesis
This session will look at the circulation and transfer of critical discourses, as well as activist practices that challenge the dominant ways of making cities after 1945. From a transnational perspective, the aim is to trace the networks, interrelations and genealogies of critical and alternative urbanism in contemporary Europe and beyond.
Presentation
After the Second World War, the acceleration of urbanisation and the generalisation of the principles of the Modern movement transformed European cities and the daily lives of their inhabitants. Faced with building, urban planning and development policies that were decided centrally or authoritatively, without taking account of residents and their needs, an oppositional movement arose across Europe that varied in terms of how radical it was. In a number of European countries, residents, urban professionals, researchers, political activists, associations and religious leaders became critiqued the new urban development patterns, and took action at grassroots level to oppose them and build alternatives. In the 1960s and 1970s, as pushback against the social, political and economic order in Western countries became broader, urban struggles multiplied. The simultaneity or proximity in time of these urban social movements made the circulation of similar slogans, strategies, objectives and forms of protest across Europe more visible. This leads to study these critics and social movements, not only from an international or comparative but also a transnational perspective.
This session will look at the circulation and transfer of critical discourse, as well as the practices and knowledge of activists who challenged the dominant ways of making the city after 1945. From a transnational historical perspective, the aim is to trace the more or less formal networks , interrelationships and genealogies of critical and alternative urbanism in contemporary Europe and beyond. Based on case studies precisely situated in time and space, the proposals are invited to:
– Demonstrate the plurality of spheres and networks (political, academic, intellectual, trade union, religious, administrative, professional) that have contributed to the international circulation of experiments in critical and alternative urbanism, and examine, for example, the mediating role played by some of the people involved, through travel or translation work.
– Identify precisely what is circulated and shared – e.g. frameworks of thought or analysis, means of action and mobilisation (occupation, squatting, investigative practices), alternative planning practices or political organisation – and the material and immaterial ways in which they are circulated. The possible difficulties of documenting and studying these circulations involving militant spheres and actors, in opposition to the authorities or even, in an authoritarian context, underground, could be mentioned
– Highlight the different levels of circulation (local, national, international) of critical discourse and mobilisation opposing urban policies, and determining the extent and meaning of these circulations, even looking at the generational transmission of these critical and militant experiences, drawing up other ways of making the city.
Session 72
Specialist Session
Transcribing Urbanistic Networks in Europe: Standardization and Symbolism in Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes
Organizers
- Katerina Chatzikonstantinou
University of Thessaly, Greece - David Martín López
University of Granada, Spain
Keywords
authoritarian and totalitarian regimes, colonial urbanism, unconfortable heritage, urban replication
Synthesis
This session explores the transnational networks, urban policies and spatial strategies that shaped the replication of urban models across Europe and beyond during the Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes of the 20th century, focusing on the dissemination of architectural forms, urban layouts, and planning ideologies.
Presentation
This session explores the transnational networks, urban policies and spatial strategies that shaped the replication of urban models across Europe and beyond during the Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes of the 20th century, focusing on the dissemination of architectural forms, urban layouts, and planning ideologies.
This proposal investigates how urbanism became a powerful tool for political control, cultural uniformity, and ideological expression, and how, in a way, the aesthetics of “copy and paste” in urbanism were used as a symbol of their ideology. We welcome papers that engage with a range of case studies, from monumental city plans and worker housing estates to symbolic public spaces and institutional architectures, highlighting how these were often imposed through top-down mechanisms and shared across borders through professional, political, and ideological networks.
We invite to examine how different countries have approached public display and use of controversial heritage and urbanism of regimes, particularly in light of international guidelines such as the ICOMOS (International Cultural Heritage Tourism Charter) (2022), related to uncomfortable heritage and the current global debates stemming from movements such as Black Lives Matter and the rise of decolonial thinking.
In particular, submissions that explore the following topics are invited, mainly focusing on cases that discuss:
• Distinct socio-political and economic circumstances that formed specific national development policies with urban significance.
• Decolonizing strategies and preservation policies of contested architectural urbanism.
• Political ideologies and urban planning at Universities during totalitarian and authoritarian regimes.
• The role of Architectural and Urbanism Journals in the process of “Copy and paste”.
• The Copying of the Past and the reinvention of monuments.
• Archetype urban planning and social housing in colonies in the regimes.
• An overview of the international relationship between overseas politics, urban development, and the expansion of the modern movement in the regimes.
• The success or failure of the urban policies of the regimes.
• The difference between regimes and democracies in the urban planning of workers colonies.
• Urbanism and Architectural monuments related to War Memorials in the regimes.
Papers that offer comparative perspectives, especially across nations, would be particularly welcome.
This session proposal is part of the Research Project titled “Fragmented Memories and Uncomfortable Heritage: Managing the Francoist Legacy from a Comparative Perspective (MEFRAP)” at the University of Granada.
Session 73
Main Session
Global Urban Networks Revisited: Transnational Urban Planning in the Cold War Period
Organizers
- Ana Tostões
University of Lisbon - Kengo Hayashi
Institute of Industrial Science, the University of Tokyo
Keywords
transnational urban planning history, Cold War politics, East-West and North-South encounters, urban planning technocracy
Synthesis
The post-war period marked a profound transformation in urban concepts and practices worldwide. As transnational urban networks expanded, Cold War politics emerged as a defining force in shaping cities. This panel revisits these networks over the lens of East-West encounters, exploring how transnational actors influenced the modernization of cities
Presentation
The post-war period marked a profound transformation in urban concepts and practices worldwide. As transnational urban networks expanded, Cold War politics emerged as a defining force in the shaping of cities, from Europe to the Global South. This panel revisits global urban networks through the lens of East-West encounters, exploring how transnational actors, urban planning technocrats, and ideological competition influenced the modernization of cities in the Global South.
Urban planning in the post-colonial world was shaped by a variety of forces. Graduates from institutions like Harvard’s urban research centres carried modernist planning ideas across the globe, while early national planners, trained in Euro-American institutions, returned to reshape urban policies in their home countries. Though colonial-era planning legacies persisted, the new political realities of post-independence states required adjustments that aligned with national aspirations.
The Cold War further transformed global urban networks. Socialist countries, led by the Soviet Union, played a significant role in shaping cities through technical aid and planning expertise provided to newly independent nations. Meanwhile, Western institutions such as the United Nations and philanthropic organizations like the Ford Foundation influenced urbanization processes with financial and technical support. The competing visions of socialist and capitalist urbanism left lasting imprints on the built environment and urban governance in the Global South.
Over the past two decades, this area of research has grown among scholars worldwide. This panel invites both theoretical and empirical contributions that examine the intersection of global urban history, Cold War politics, and transnational planning expertise. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
– How did transnational urban experts contribute to shaping post-colonial cities?
– In what ways did Cold War politics reshape global urban networks?
– How did urban planning education influence transnational urban networks?
– What role did global encounters play in restructuring urbanization in the Cold War period?
– How did the Soviet Union influence post-war global urban networks?
By addressing these questions, this panel aims to deepen the understanding of how urban planning operated as a transnational practice during the Cold War era, and how global networks of expertise, knowledge exchange, and ideological competition shaped urban modernity.
Session 74
Round Table
Shaping Global Urbanization: Expert Networks in the Mid-Twentieth Century
Organizers
- Cedric Feriel
University Rennes 2 , Société Française d’Histoire Urbaine - Rosemary Wakeman
Fordham University, New York
Keywords
expertise, global urbanization, colonial/postcolonial, Post-War, environment
Synthesis
When is it possible to speak of global expertise and a network of experts dealing with global urbanization? This session will examine the importance of the mid-20th-century turning point on this question, based on wartime and postwar, reconstruction, urban crisis and planning, colonial/postcolonial, resource extraction and environmental issues.
Presentation
When can we speak of global expertise and a network of experts dealing with global urbanization? This session aims to examine the importance of the mid-twentieth-century turning point in the change of scales in networks of expertise regarding the urban future.
The issue of global urbanization, as foresseen by historiography, is strongly marked by the mid-twentieth-century turn. Prior to this period, work in the early twentieth century emphasized the importance of city networks and essentially European or transatlantic expertise based on exchanges between municipalities and progressive elites (Daniel T. Rodgers, 1998; Renaud Payre, 2007; Pierre-Yves Saunier, Shane Ewen, 2009). Scholars have also pointed to the crucial importance of the colonial context in shaping cities in the global south (Isabella Jackson, 2017; Sheetla Chhabria, 2019; Debjani Bhattacharyya, 2019). In both cases, the expression “global urbanization” rarely appears.
After 1945, a radical shift appears in the way the issue is addressed. Research emphasizes the importance of decolonization and the Cold War (Lukasz Stanek, 2020), the rise of the United States (Amy C. Offner, 2019) and the development of international organizations (Richard Harris, Ceinwen Giles, 2003).
Bridging these two periods has rarely been the subject of scientific investigation. This session aims to fill this gap by questioning the rupture of the mid-20th century in order to focus on the continuities and evolution in the formulation of global urbanization and the networks of expertise concerned with it. In particular, we will consider :
• Life trajectories and careers of experts. How many of the experts on “global urbanization” after 1945 began their careers in colonial administration? How many came from European or transatlantic city networks? Many were also deeply involved in urban issues in their own countries. How did they combine these two scales in their practices and projects?
• Continuity and renewal of issues. While the issues on the international agenda changed significantly after 1945 (state building, urban crisis and planning, resource extraction and environment), can we trace the continuity of solutions proposed before the war?
• Connections and dialogues between expert networks. This session will explore the reciprocal contacts and influences between experts. It will focus in particular on the levers that enable them to do so (international organizations, journals, conferences, competitions and commissions, crises).
• Expert perspectives on global urbanization. How did expert planners, architects, and policy makers formulate and reformulate ideas about global urbanization and the role of cities? What continuity existed in their theories and what were responses to the changing conditions of the mid-twentieth century?
Session 75
Specialist Session
Negotiating Nature in the Histories of post-World War II Housing: Policies, Discourses and Practices in Europe and Beyond.
Organizers
- Gaia Caramellino
DAStU-Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, Milan - Nicole De Togni
DAD-Politecnico di Torino, Department of Architecture and Design, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
Keywords
housing histories, nature, residential landscape, post-WWII urban history, historiography
Synthesis
Questioning the interrelation between dwelling and nature, the session reconsiders the history of post-WWII housing through the lens of its natural landscape. Crossing landscape, planning, architecture, urban, and environmental histories, it introduces hidden narratives and a new understanding of the times and forms of post-war urban development.
Presentation
The histories of housing and dwelling have often been written through the lens of built architecture, while the role of natural environments has been rarely explored originating a divorce between the buildings and their surrounding territories.
Focusing on the interrelation between dwelling and nature, the leading question of the session is to reconsider the history of residential buildings and neighborhoods through the lens of their natural landscape. Key issues revolve around unveiling hidden narratives of the post-war modernization project and questioning the consolidated historiographic and interpretative framework of urban history. The session thus addresses housing as a layered infrastructure, an interface between the territorial scale and the architecture of daily life, and an occasion of dialogue and negotiation between technical, institutional, and design cultures.
Positioning the history of post-war housing at the crossroads of historiographies of landscape, planning, architecture, and urban, technical, and environmental studies, the session is interested in mapping the diverse networks of professionals and institutions involved in the housing sector – architects, planners, landscape designers, gardeners, developers, builders but also public institutions, policymakers, administrators, and social agents – questioning their roles, agencies, and practices in shaping the post-war natural environments. In the context of recent historiography (Jeanne Haffner 2022; Bernadette Blanchon 2007, 2011), it aims at codifying divergent disciplinary discourses, design ideas, residential models, social visions, norms, urban and planning policies, and their interrelations. Moreover, the codification of the discourse on the integrated design of housing and landscape, its sites of elaboration, and vectors of dissemination (press, manuals, bulletins, reports, …) are of particular interest.
While technical planning conceives nature as a measurable entity expressed in terms of quantitative indexes and planning “standards”, generating a disconnection between the design of the city and its physical character, invited papers could: investigate diverse scales and design cultures; examine significant occasions and sites of the academic, institutional, technical, or professional debate; address the micro-history of buildings and neighborhoods; investigate specific professional profiles that remained on the margin of the discourse; adopt a transnational and comparative perspective. Among the aims, the session intends to identify new historiographic directions in the history of post-war housing when addressed through its landscape; understand the layered processes of construction and theorization of post-WWII urban growth; and reconsider consolidated narratives in the history and historiographies of urban design. Cross-fertilization between diverse research fields, methodologies, and practices would be encouraged.
Session 76
Specialist Session
The urban history of socio-ecological trade-offs. Negotiating environmental ‘goods’ and ‘bads’
Organizers
- Koenraad Danneels
Katholieken Universiteit Leuven - Wout Saelens
University of Antwerp
Keywords
biodiversity offsetting, compensation landscapes, green trade-offs, negotiation urbanism
Synthesis
Since the 1970s, cities and regions are increasingly protecting and developing green spaces through the ecological ‘offsetting’ of urbanization. This session explores the tools and negotiations linked to such compensation policies, questioning how real estate developers, (urban) governments, and planners negotiate ecological and social trade-offs.
Presentation
Urban development has always required negotiation between environmental ‘goods’—such as green space, clean air, and access to water—and environmental ‘bads’—pollution, waste, or ecological degradation. From early modern public health campaigns to industrial-era zoning ordinances, from colonial ecological interventions to 20th-century greenbelt movements, cities have long experimented with mechanisms to manage, mitigate, or displace ecological harm.
Access to the ‘right to nature’ is thus frequently negotiated through spatial arrangements and policy tools that offset environmental encroachment. Today, such policies are increasingly commonplace. In terms of green space development, for example, biodiversity offsetting, nature compensation and ‘Net Gain’ policies are seen as innovative development frameworks—hailed by planning experts and developers for their potential to unlock development, but criticised in critical geography for their ‘neoliberal’ nature. Harmful activities are often portrayed as a ‘net positive’ due to the unlocking of compensatory measures in environmental negotiations, and civil contestation becomes increasingly ambiguous when environmental improvements appear to depend on ‘equal’ destructive activities.
Still, research on these practices has largely disregarded the longer urban history of environmental mitigation and compensation. The (urban) history of ‘socio-ecological trade-offs’ remains largely unwritten and is an undertheorised sidenote in studies of urban activism, urban nature conservation, and landscape and environmental history. In a longer historical framework, the history of planning can also be read as a history of environmental mitigation—i.e., the continuous trade-off between urban development and the mitigation of its impact, whether through the mobilisation of survey methods in the 19th century or the establishment of ‘planning benefits’ in more recent planning history. Can urban history retheorise urbanisation as a history of socio-ecological trade-offs and how it redistributes environmental ‘goods’ and ‘bads’ in the context of ongoing debates on such measures?
This session welcomes contributions that develop urban histories of environmental mitigation and compensation from any of the aforementioned perspectives—or others—such as: STS perspectives on the mobilisation of scientific knowledge in planning negotiations; the socio-ecological offsetting of urban development; or environmental histories of activism and their negotiation tools and institutional roles. We also seek to include histories of (neo)colonial ecological restoration and extractive landscapes related to ‘green colonialism’ in colonial and postcolonial contexts. Other-than-human perspectives on the development of urban nature and its agency in contesting capitalist urbanisation could also be among the methodologically relevant contributions. We invite histories across times and scales, but are particularly interested in the ways in which the ‘urban’ is redesigned and replanned through mitigation and compensation policies.
Session 77
Main Session
Urban movements, participatory spatial practices and the transformation of cities
Organizers
- Albert Recio
Department of Economy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Asunción Blanco
Department of Geography, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Marta Serra
Department of Theory and History of Architecture, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - Jere Kuzmanic
Department of Urbanism, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Keywords
urban movements, urban conflicts, urban policies, neighbours, participatory practices, community planning, architectural historiography, cross-cultural perspective
Synthesis
Urban and grassroots movements are active agents that shape the production of space, including the aspects of reproducing social life on a neighbourhood scale, forms and norms of building and planning, as well as the role and contestation of expertise in architecture and urbanism. The objective of the session is to put in dialogue experiences in different cities to learn how urban movements influence urban politics and what we can learn from the history of participatory architecture practices in the context of sociopolitical divides fostered by spatial relations.
Presentation
The session analyses the role of urban social movements, participatory practices in architecture and community planning in the transformation of cities. The focus is on the interrelation between demands coming from neighbours and collaborative technicians as a force that challenges institutional paradigms that develop urban projects, particular design approaches and methods, and socially excluding processes often led by the logic of capital accumulation and technocratic policy makers. In this regard, Barcelona has a rich tradition of urban movements and experiences of cooperation. This tradition resurfaced during the same period when, in other European contexts, the movement of community architecture and dweller-controlled urbanism emerged. This opens a series of interrelated inquiries: How can research into case studies of social engagement in the built environment expand and challenge dominant reference frameworks inherited from mainstream historiography of urban development? How are these legacies of social action constructed, under what conditions do they emerge, and how do they gain visibility or legitimacy? How do these practices intersect with cross-cultural geographies beyond Europe and its canonical past? How do we position ourselves within—or outside—histories of participation, and with what implications for contemporary urban movements? The study of these questions is not only relevant from a historical perspective,
but it is also crucial for developing policies and initiatives to address today’s urban challenges: social segregation and inequalities, ecological crises, and the rise of authoritarian populism.
We invite proposals that address:
– Urban grassroots movements, their emergence, context, organisation, their capacity to influence urban agenda of local governments and formal institutions; as well as potential connections to experiences in community-driven planning and self-building in urban areas.
– Relations between grassroots social movements and urbanists and other technicians in the context of community architecture/planning and similar movements examined through different disciplinary perspectives and their capacity to generate alternative narratives on urban history. Other members participating in the organization of the session are: Alberto Franchini,Technische Universität München; José Mansilla, Department of Anthropology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Jordi Mir, Deparment of Politics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Session 78
Specialist Session
Ecological Postmodern - Architecture and Urban Design after the Oil Shock
Organizers
- Florian Urban
History of Architecture and Urban Studies (HAUS), Glasgow School of Art - Janina Gosseye
Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, TU Delft
Keywords
postmodernism, ecological architecture, low-energy architecture, 1980s architecture, neo-vernacular
Synthesis
This session seeks to take stock of ecological architecture and urban design that emerged in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. It will look in particular at the connections between postmodernism and ecological approaches during this period, from large government-financed programmes to counter-cultural initiatives.
Presentation
The publication of the Club of Rome report Limits to Growth (1972) and the Oil Shock (1973) had significant repercussions in architecture and urban design. By the mid-1970s, the paradigm of obsolescence that for decades had dominated these disciplines was eclipsed by new approaches that sought to maintain rather than expand existing resources. Countertactics to obsolescence that emerged at the time were both postmodern and ecological, taking up historical and vernacular forms, new approaches to conservation and adaptive reuse, as well as technological solutions.
Our session seeks to take stock of the achievements of these different forms of ecological architecture and urban design that emerged in the quarter century following the publication of Limits to Growth. We invite contributions to questions such as: How did the ecological projects of the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s address sustainability? How did they express their ecological or sustainable agenda in built form? How well did they perform? We welcome papers that consider the full spectrum of countertactics to obsolescence, and across scales: from large government-financed programmes to counter-cultural initiatives. Papers on innovative solutions that may still have model character are particularly welcome.
Session 79
Specialist Session
Post-Socialist Deindustrialization and Urban Transformation: Resilience, Adaptation, and Global Comparative Perspectives.
Organizers
- Vítězslav Sommer
Institute of Contemporary History, Czech Academy of Sciences - Andrea Pokludová
University of Ostrava, Czech Republic - Martin Jemelka
Institute of Philosophy, Czech Academy of Sciences,
Keywords
deindustrialization; industrial cities; economic transformation; global networks; geopolitics
Synthesis
This session explores the long-term implications of deindustrialization and economic transformation in urban and industrial regions. Focusing on post-1989 changes in former socialist states, it also welcomes comparative perspectives, including earlier waves of deindustrialization and industrial cities’ evolving global economic ties.
Presentation
Deindustrialization has reshaped industrial cities across the globe, often posing existential challenges to urban economies and communities. This session investigates how deindustrialized urban regions have adapted, restructured, and sought new pathways for economic sustainability, focusing on post-1989 transformations in former socialist states and industrial cities’ evolving global economic linkages.
1989 led to centrally planned economies and exposing urban regions to market-driven forces. The privatization and integration into global production networks led to profound urban transformations. Many cities struggled with unemployment, social instability, and the decline of urban infrastructure. Others leveraged these disruptions to stimulate innovation, new industries, and heritage-led regeneration. Recent research should situate this phenomenon within the framework of global economic shifts, including the rise of new industrial hubs in the Global South.
This session will also examine earlier waves of deindustrialization from the 1970s onward to provide a broader comparative framework. Case studies will analyze similarities and differences in policy responses and the role of global economic shifts in shaping urban resilience. We welcome discussions on how industrial cities have navigated shifts in production models, labor markets, and governance structures in response to economic shocks and the reorganization of global supply chains.
Key questions include: How have industrial post-socialist cities responded to deindustrialization? What strategies have enabled some urban regions to adapt and thrive while others have stagnated? How have changes in global production networks affected European industrial cities? What role did geopolitics, environmental policies, and industrial heritage play?
This session welcomes interdisciplinary perspectives. Contributions may include sector-specific studies, city case analyses, and comparative explorations of deindustrialization across different temporal and geographical contexts. This session aims to generate new insights into the long-term trajectories of deindustrialized cities and regions within a global economic framework.
Session 80
Main Session
Images and narratives of post-industrial urban spaces
Organizers
- Leeke Reinders
TU Delft, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands - Patricia Tamayo Perez
KU Leuven (Belgium) and School of Architecture UIC Barcelona - Antoni Vilanova Omedas
School of Architecture La Salle (ETSALS), Ramon Llull University
Keywords
post-industrial sites; memory, identity, and culture life; retrofit; visual methodologies; design-based approaches.
Synthesis
This session explores post-industrial urban spaces as sites of memory, transformation, and potential. Moving beyond functionalist and speculative paradigms, it invites critical reflections on visual methodologies and identity to rethink urban imaginaries, design approaches, and urban strategies, engaging both scholarly and design-based research.
Presentation
Urban development has often been guided by the idea of a “universal and neutral” user, reducing the multiplicity of everyday life to a homogenized logic of “one-size-fits-all.” Yet space is never truly neutral. It holds memories, bears witness to how people have used it over time and often shows signs of decay or abandonment. This is especially evident in former industrial areas, where efforts to physically reshape the land intersect with how people remember the past and imagine the future. These sites are often wounded places – leftover, forgotten, abandoned, or neglected – that sit uneasily within the planning schemes of urban developers. They oscillate between opportunity and conflict. They can spark new forms of social interaction, but also are at risk of being turned into commercial projects that exclude or displace the people who once gave them meaning.
In light of these tensions, the post-industrial condition invites a renewed reflection on urban imaginaries, design methodologies and planning strategies that move beyond functionalist or speculative approaches. This session seeks to explore a range of critical questions:
(1) What visual methodologies enable us to imagine the past and future trajectories of urban spaces?
(2) How should we intervene in the urban voids left by processes of deindustrialization?
(3) What roles do stories and images of memory and identity play in shaping urban and social responses to the disappearance of industrial landmarks?
(4) Can the transformation of industrial objects and spaces be understood as a new phase of urban speculation?
(5) How might the current housing crisis become a lever for rethinking the design and programming of future urban environments?
We welcome contributions that critically examine these issues through empirical, theoretical, historical, or project-based lenses. We seek to explore the past and future of post-industrial urban sites from multiple perspectives, and invite contributions from design professions (architects, planners, landscape designers) and social sciences (historians, anthropologists, sociologists). We look for written as well as visual contributions.
Session 81
Specialist Session
Downtown Revisited: Neoliberal Urban Planning in Historical Perspective Across Europe and Beyond
Organizers
- Petr Roubal
Institute of Cotemporary History, Czech Academy of Sciences - Henrieta Moravčíková
Institute of History, Slovak Academy of Sciences - Matěj Spurný
Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague
Keywords
Downtown Neoliberalisation Urban Planning Post-socialism
Synthesis
This session examines three decades of neoliberal urban planning through the lens of new understanding of city centers in Europe. It invites comparisons between post-socialist and Western contexts, reflecting on the role of global capital, public interest, and the shifting nature of democratic urban governance.
Presentation
How have the last three decades of urban transformation reshaped the idea and materiality of the city center in post-socialist and Western European contexts? This session seeks to take stock of neoliberal urban planning through a historical lens, focusing on the emergence and contestation of new urban cores—“downtowns”—as key sites where global capital, local governance, and public space intersect.
Emerging from the postwar modernist vision of “The Heart of the City,” postmodern critiques in the 1980s shifted urban discourse toward contextualism, layered urbanity, and community-centered planning. Yet by the 1990s, especially in post-socialist Europe, the implementation of urban centers increasingly fell under the influence of private investors, as public institutions weakened and market-based planning took hold. What has been gained—and what has been lost—in this shift?
This session invites papers that explore the evolution of neoliberal planning paradigms since the late 20th century, focusing on new central districts as crystallizations of changing governance structures, investor-state relations, and the (in)visibility of public interest. In line with the central theme of the conference the session encourages comparative approaches that highlight both convergences and divergences across cities in Europe and beyond—and that reflect on the broader global urban networks in which these developments are embedded.
Key questions include:
• How did the modernist concept of a city center transform across different political and economic regimes in the last four decades?
• In what ways did public and private actors shape the transformation of central urban spaces?
• Can recent developments, such as Manhatization, city branding or overtourism, be seen as part of a global trend toward the weakening of democratic urban governance?
The session aims to:
• Reassess the history of neoliberal urban development in Europe through a comparative and critical lens;
• Explore the role of city networks, international investors, and planning expertise in shaping urban cores;
• Investigate the extent to which cities have maintained—or abandoned—the ideal of the public city.
Relevant themes include (but are not limited to):
• The evolution of city centers: from modernist social cores to financialized downtowns;
• Relationship between postmodern and neoliberal urbanism
• Citizen participation and its erosion in urban planning processes;
• Case studies of resistance, contestation, or successful regulation of urban transformation;
• The role of urban design competitions, zoning plans, and strategic land sales;
• Global influences and city networks in the making of “new urban hearts.”
By gathering diverse case studies and critical reflections, the session aims to deepen our understanding of how urban centers have been made—and remade—under neoliberalism and to identify new ways of thinking about the public interest in contemporary urbanism.
Session 82
Main Session
Saving the Heart of the City: From Barcelona to Venice, the Past and Future of Historic Urban Centres
Organizers
- Josep Maria Boronat Pujals
AADIPA (Agrupació d’Arquitectes per a la Defensa i la Intervenció en el Patrimoni Arquitectònic), COAC, Barcelona - Sergio Pascolo
Venice Urban Lab, (associazione APS)
Keywords
future, Barcelona, Venice, historic urban centers, tourism
Synthesis
From Barcelona to Venice, this session analyses the long-term transformation of historic urban centres under the pressures of tourism and habitability challenges. It explores the historical roots, the evolution of impacts, and the diverse responses—from community, institutional, and academic spheres—that aim to protect the social, cultural, and residential fabric of these cities.
Presentation
1. Introduction
Historic city centres have been key spaces of economic, social, and cultural exchange for centuries. Cities like Barcelona and Venice exemplify a long trajectory of adaptation to structural changes over time. In recent decades, these areas have undergone deep transformations: commodified heritage, mass tourism, housing crises, and the decline of local life. Far from being isolated phenomena, these tensions are part of a historical evolution marked by the expansion of tourism capitals, real estate speculation, and digital technologies. This session proposes a historical and comparative reading of these dynamics, in order to identify strategies to recover and sustain urban habitability in the long term.
2. Central question
How can we reverse the social and heritage degradation of Europe’s historic urban centres through historical analysis and renewed urban governance? What strategies, informed by the past, can protect local life, commerce, and culture in these spaces?
3. Key themes
• Historical evolution of urban centres within city networks
• Long-term impacts of mass tourism and global capital
• Gentrification, housing pressures, and identity loss over time
• Public policy, citizen resistance, and the right to the city
• Historical models and alternative futures for regeneration
4. Scientific relevance
This session contributes to key historiographical debates on heritage, neoliberal urbanism, and the tourist city. By linking urban history to contemporary challenges, it offers a framework to understand how power and habitability have circulated and been contested over time in historic centres.
5. Objectives
• Promote critical and historical analysis of urban change
• Enable comparative dialogue between cities
• Connect interdisciplinary research and practice
• Highlight both historical and innovative responses to urban degradation
• Promote the right to inhabit and transform historic centres
6. Central cases
Barcelona and Venice serve as starting points. Both cities have experienced a long history of exchange and pressure, with recent transformations driven by intensive tourism and population loss. However, they differ in urban structure and governance. The session addresses issues such as heritage as identity and resource, housing and commercial policy, and both institutional and grassroots responses in historical perspective.
7. Possible paper topics
• Urban networks across time
• Heritage commodification and local economies
• Historical effects of gentrification and tourism
• Evolving legal frameworks and urban governance
• Comparative and interdisciplinary approaches
• Post-pandemic transitions
• Regeneration strategies for inclusive and sustainable centres
8. Call for participation
We invite contributions from historians, urbanists, sociologists, geographers, and scholars from related disciplines. The session aims to connect research with action, offering international and interdisciplinary perspectives to imagine new, historically informed futures for threatened historic centres.
Session 83
Main Session
Urban Healthcare Architecture: Networks and Exchanges in the 20th Century
Organizers
- Alfons Zarzoso
Institute for Research in Humanities Milà i Fontanals, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain - Christina Malathouni
School of Architecture, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom - Barry Doyle
Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Manchester
Keywords
healthcare architecture, study tours, transnational information exchange, internationalising design, resisting internationalism
Synthesis
New ways of approaching illness from the mid-19th century impacted 20th-century healthcare spaces. Transnational exchanges that informed European urban healthcare architecture in this period reflect formal and informal city networks, within and beyond the continent, which further enlighten related socio-economic contexts and scientific advances.
Presentation
As new ways of approaching illness took place in Europe from the mid-19th century onwards, healthcare spaces were transformed. Related architecture became visible in European cities in the 20th century, often with an impact on the urban scale too. A varied set of initiatives was seen, public and private, aimed at mental health, maternity, surgical clinics, laboratories, sanatoria, polyclinics, etc. and a modern hospital system became progressively established across the Western world.
The cross-fertilisation between medical advances and architectural and urban developments adds a particularly fruitful layer of complexity: far from universally accepted dogmas, medical and related scientific advances were often contentious and attracted strong reactions, both alliances and antagonisms. Similarly, architectural and urban developments were embraced in varying rates in different localities and interacted with deeply embedded local cultural traditions. Against this background, a range of knowledge exchanges are known to have taken place among various stakeholders, such as study tours and publications, commissioned by public administrations or private initiatives. The proposed session aims to explore the development of such exchanges relating to urban healthcare architecture, alongside formal or informal city networks across individual states and nations.
In view of recent global health crises and critical scientific developments affecting healthcare provision, including its spatial parameters, the proposed topic is of special significance. The EU-funded COST Action 22159 National, International and Transnational Histories of Healthcare, 1850-2000 (EuroHealthHist, 2023-27; https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA22159/) exemplifies the current interest in histories of exchanges across Europe. Recent historiographic publications on early 20th-century healthcare spaces (e.g. Brady, 2018; Doyle, 2023; Richardson Blakeman, 2023) or the modern hospital (e.g. Kisacky, 2017; Willis, Goad, and Logan, 2019) highlight the current interest in the 20th century. Publications with an emphasis on urban history and health come closer to our topic but for an earlier period (e.g. Gharipour and Tchikine, 2023). Finally, critical scholarship expanding to former colonies is also emerging (e.g. De Nys-Ketels, et al, 2019).
The principal questions are:
– how were transnational city networks and knowledge exchanges determined and partners identified?
– what was their impact on urban healthcare architecture?
– how were such networks and exchanges related to opposing tendencies, like internationalising design and resisting internationalism?
Additional questions can include:
– what disparate trends might be discerned within individual states or nations?
– how might national overarching tendencies have affected specific city networks across borders?
– what has the impact of specific professional, commercial and business interests been?
– what other forms have knowledge exchanges taken?
Session 84
Main Session
Spatializing Popular Music: urban networks of creativity in Europe and Beyond, c. 1930-2000
Organizers
- Ilja Van Damme
UAntwerp - Simon Gunn
University of Leicester - Stijn Oosterlynck
University of Antwerp
Keywords
popular music, networks, creativity, urban change
Synthesis
The following session seeks to spatialise popular music through so-called ‘networks of creativity’. We question how musical innovation and styles are to be explained not so much through national identities, schools, and traditions, but mainly by looking at differences in the urban places under consideration.
Presentation
Since the 1930s popular music – jazz, rhythm and blues, pop, rock, electronica, hip-hop and more – has been increasingly identified with the city. Yet, a spatialized understanding of how modern popular music came about, how it was produced, distributed and consumed in so-called ‘networks of creativity’, has still to emerge. More in general, we need to understand better the relationship between urban spaces and musical forms as they spread across Europe, the West and the global south through the mid- and late twentieth century. How was the emergence of popular music, for instance, linked to a growing cultural exchange taking place in increasingly diverse cities, migrant quarters, and arrival neighborhoods? And why is the evolution of popular music to be understood as a characteristically urban ‘creative industry’, linked to certain city districts, typical small and medium-sized enterprises, flexible forms of specialization, and the gestation of hybrid urban subcultures?
In this session we invite speakers to both theorize and historize deeply the relationship between space and popular music in the twentieth century. We are interested in HOW, WHAT, and WHERE popular music came about in places of production (from garages over cellars to studio’s), was spatially distributed (via records stores to jukeboxes), and eventually consumed (in bars, dancehalls, warehouses, clubs, discotheques, and so on).
New empirical research can explore the ‘networks of creativity’ of popular music, analyzing and comparing the type of cities and urban networks involved. We hypothesize how musical styles and innovation is to be explained not so much by national identities, schools, and traditions, but mainly by differences in the social, demographical, and ethnic composition of the urban places under consideration and the political and power regimes involved (enhancing or stifling, for instance, free creative expression). Last, but not least, we question the impact and effects of popular music on the evolution of cities: on their neighborhoods, on the generation of the night-time and creative economies, and on the multiple ways that popular music refracted subcultural identities, related to class, age, gender, ethnicity and sexuality.
Session 85
Specialist Session
Jewish City Biographies: Issues, Themes, and the Definition of a Genre
Organizers
- Bart Wallet
University of Amsterdam - Sietske van der Veen
University of Amsterdam - Susanne Korbel
University of Graz & Central European University
Keywords
Jews, city biography, urban biography, Jewish urban history
Synthesis
This session will question how we can arrive at a critical genre of the Jewish city biography, which combines the strengths of Jewish urban history and those of the genre of urban biographies.
Presentation
This specialist session will be the first step towards establishing the historiographical genre of the Jewish city biography. The field of Jewish urban history has expanded in recent years and resulted in a steady stream of new projects and publications. Yet, academic studies focusing on the comprehensive Jewish histories of certain cities have largely remained absent. Most studies focus on specific time periods, or take a thematic angle. In the public realm, however, extensive historical portrayals of cities focusing on their Jewish past exist, although they often appear to be encyclopedic or nostalgic. The general genre of the urban or city biography, at the intersection of public history and urban studies, has been grappling with similar issues relating to the challenges of exceptionalism and urban patriotism for at least the last thirty years. How can we arrive at a critical genre of the Jewish city biography, which combines the strengths of Jewish urban history and those of the genre of urban biographies, while also bringing both towards a new phase? As such, the genre will need to question not only what urban spaces meant to their Jewish inhabitants, but also how Jews shaped the cities they lived in – also in mutual exchange with their non-Jewish counterparts. Studying this dialectical process offers the possibility to critically assess the genre of the urban biography as a whole, positioning the diverse group of Jews as another main character next to the city. Our specialist session aims to discuss the main methodologies for writing Jewish city biographies, chart the toolbox of their authors, and map the best practices of current scholars working in the field.
Potential themes include:
– How to write a Jewish city biography?
– How to intersect general urban biographies and Jewish city biographies?
– Dynamics of Jews and the city
– Jewish diasporas and the city
– Jewish urban landscapes
– The Jewish city and the countryside
– Port cities and the making of port Jews
– Jews and the metropolis
– Jewish urban networks
– Intersecting economic, religious, and cultural Jewish urban histories
– Jewish quarters, streets, and houses
– Jewish urban architectures
– Jewish aesthetics of the city
– Jewish urban philosophies
– Jewish urban borders (i.e. eruvim)
– Jewish/non-Jewish urban encounters
– Jewish migrations and their impact on the city
Session 86
Main Session
Networked Emotions: Exploring the Felt Experiences of Urban Places
Organizers
- Rebecca Madgin
University of Glasgow - Nicolas Kenny
Simon Fraser University
Keywords
emotions, feelings, experiences, communities,
Synthesis
How we feel in/about places is an individual and collective experience that is nested within layers of different networks: personal, professional, and spatial. This session will explore this networked aspect by examining the ways in which our emotions are shaped by the flows of information that exist within/between networks of people and places.
Presentation
How we feel in and about places is an individual and collective experience that is nested within layers of different networks: personal, professional, and spatial. This session will explore this networked aspect by examining the ways in which our emotions are shaped by the flows of information that exist within and between networks of people and places.
Our session is framed around one key question: How does a focus on emotions, feelings, and experiences as expressed in a diverse array of sources, shed new light on the social and cultural significance of urban networks? We define networks as being comprised of people both in place and between places. We do not seek to narrow the conceptualisation of networks but suggest that papers could address how emotions, feelings, and experiences are shaped by and within communities of practice and place including through, eg, associational culture, professional membership organisations, activist groups, unions, town-twinning initiatives, pan urban interest groups etc.
Of particular interest are questions concerning how our experiences of cities are shaped by our personal and professional networks that exist both within place and across borders. How for example, do certain emotional communities of place and practice form in particular geographic locations? In what ways do intra/inter-urban networks enable emotional communities to transcend geographic borders? Can networks serve to splinter as well as nurture particular kinds of emotional attachments to place? To what extent do emotional regimes shape the expression of emotions, communication of ideas, and inform decision-making? In what ways do comparative and transnational networks and flows of ideas shape how we both feel and act in place?
This session is located within the emerging field of the urban history of emotions. In particular it will place the field of urban history in conversation with scholarship on the history of the emotions to explore how feelings are expressed and experienced. In so doing the session engages with an emerging area of urban history scholarship and seeks to advance existing understanding of the spatial aspects of emotions (Kenny, 2014; Prestel, 2017, Arnout, 2019; Madgin, 2025). We are deliberately broadening the conceptualisation of emotions to include feelings and experiences. We are agnostic about what an ‘urban history of the emotions’ could include. For example, papers that are concerned with emotions, feelings, experiences, senses, or atmospheres through representational and non-representational methods are welcomed. This is partly a response to the nascent state of scholarship on the urban history of emotions and as such we will use the session to reflect on the theoretical, conceptual, and methodological implications of considering the felt experiences of cities to advance the emerging field of the urban history of emotions.
Finally, we also welcome papers from any time period and located in any geographic area.
Session 87
Main Session
Beyond Transcendence. Understanding Networks of Religious Belonging between Local Urban Parishes and Global Institutions since the Turn of the 20th Century.
Organizers
- Beate Löffler
Dortmund University, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering - Veronika Eufinger
Social Science Institute of the Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD), Hannover
Keywords
urban religion, network, diversity, glocality
Synthesis
The panel understands religious bodies and their networks as essential for the resilience of both their social and built environment of modern multi-religious cities. It aims to combine the different disciplinary approaches to the study of urban religion in order to analyse the scales, patterns and mechanisms of their glocal networks.
Presentation
It is well known that the history of the European city has been closely linked to Christianity over the centuries. There is a strong awareness for the impact of parish structures and Christian institutions – usually of a domineering denomination – on the development, transformation and resilience of the urban fabric both socially and architecturally. In recent decades, there has also been an increased understanding of religious diversity, which is lived in parallel to the dominant pattern as a matter of course. While this has stimulated both discourse and research – above all on conflicts of interpretative sovereignty – the perspectives of fields such as religious studies, sociology or architecture and urban planning still largely develop with only few overlaps. However, they all contribute to understand the social and institutional networks within the city and beyond that anchor and are anchored in places of worship and religious belonging.
The panel aims at linking the different approaches to the study of religious bodies and their interaction with the urban and at gaining a comprehensive insight into the different scales applied to connect local communities to their cities, to regional religious infrastructure and global faith systems. We seek to understand how religious bodies and their social networks contribute to the resilience of their social and built environment.
We invite scholars from various disciplines, including but not limited to urban history and urban planning, sociology, religious and cultural studies and architectural history, to present case studies of cooperation independent of religion or denomination, both intra-confessional, between denominations or between religious bodies and the secular world.
This might include cases of handing down, sharing and/or inheriting spaces of worship or parish buildings (with or without heritage status) and networks of ecumenical cooperation up to inter-faith initiatives or address the challenges of space making for communities consisting of commuting faithful.
Among others, the contributions can touch on questions like which goals or missions the networks are working towards, who the founding and supporting actors are, what makes the network an urban affair or in which way they are religious. The contributions might also address how networks affect the appropriation and utilisation of architecturally defined spaces, for example with regard to symbolic forms or the renunciation of such.
Session 88
Specialist Session
Urban Heritage and Mental Well-being: Memory, Belonging and City Networks in Modern and Contemporary Cities
Organizers
- Giulia Mezzalama
Politecnico of Turin, Interuniversity Department of Regional & Urban Studies and Planning (DIST) - Aude Naud
University of Nîmes
Keywords
urban heritage, mental well-being, urban history, memory and identity
Synthesis
This session explores how urban heritage has supported mental well-being, identity, and care in modern and contemporary cities, highlighting how such practices have circulated through city networks conceived not only as infrastructural systems, but as circuits of memory, emotion, and belonging.
Presentation
How does urban heritage contribute to mental well-being, social cohesion, and a sense of belonging in modern and contemporary cities? This session explores how cultural heritage—tangible and intangible, material and symbolic—has historically shaped emotional landscapes, supported identity, and contributed to the psychological life of urban communities from the 19th to the 21st century.
Urban environments have long been structured not only by infrastructures and planning, but also by affective geographies: memories, rituals, symbolic sites, places of attachment, and shared narratives. As cities evolved through industrialization, modernization, migration, and political transformation, urban heritage has offered tools to navigate change and foster continuity across generations. Whether through commemorative practices, preservation policies, storytelling, or artistic expression, heritage has provided frameworks for residents to engage emotionally with their urban surroundings.
This session aims to investigate the historical role of urban heritage in supporting mental well-being, broadly understood as emotional resilience, cultural belonging, intergenerational connection, and community care. We focus in particular on how these practices have been shaped by and circulated through city networks—conceived not only as infrastructural or economic systems, but also as circuits of affect, memory, and knowledge. From shared models of healing architecture (hospitals, sanatoria, public parks) to translocal rituals of commemoration, to the diffusion of heritage-based mental health and well-being initiatives, cities have long exchanged practices, symbols, and frameworks for cultural care.
We welcome papers that:
– Explore how urban heritage has contributed to emotional well-being and place attachment in different historical and urban contexts;
– Examine heritage’s role in shaping collective memory, everyday rituals, and cultural coping mechanisms;
– Analyse urban heritage-based approaches to social cohesion, participation, and care, including public spaces, museums, festivals, or grassroots initiatives;
– Investigate translocal connections and city-to-city exchanges related to heritage and urban well-being, including shared imaginaries, policy transfer, or cross-cultural narratives;
– Offer theoretical or methodological insights bridging urban history, heritage studies, emotional geographies, and environmental or psychological humanities.
By foregrounding city networks as relational and symbolic infrastructures, this session seeks to foster interdisciplinary dialogue and comparative perspectives on the emotional life of cities, positioning heritage as a key to understanding how urban societies create meaning, continuity, and resilience across time and space.
Session 89
Specialist Session
Activist knowledge(s) and the city: engaged research and its significance for urban history
Organizers
- Agustí Nieto Galan
Institut d’Història de la Ciència (IHC), Departament de Filosofia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Giusy Pappalardo
Institut d’Història de la Ciència (IHC), Departament de Filosofia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Damir Arsenijevic
University of Tuzla, Department of Philosophy and Religion
Keywords
environmental humanities, History of Science, social movements, action research, coproduction
Synthesis
This session explores the relationship between knowledge production and urban dynamics, positioning it as a subject that contributes to a critical understanding of urban history. It explores the various forms of engagement between scholarship and activism in cities throughout the 20th century. It focuses on the transnational dimensions of the nexus and networks of activists-scholars in and between cities, with a decolonial perspective
Presentation
In recent decades, there has been a rising interest in exploring the possibilities of connecting scientific knowledge with various other forms of knowledge production related to people’s direct involvement and action in urban struggles. This debate crosses the silos of disciplinary boundaries, engaging not only geographers, urban planners, anthropologists, and other scholars concerned with urban dynamics, but also fields like political ecology, environmental humanities, history of science, Science and Technology Studies (STS), social museology, and others. Despite the transdisciplinary-or, as we prefer to call it, undisciplined-character of this debate, this session aims to focus on its historical dimension and the significance of this debate for urban history, reconstructing stories and narratives correlated with the possibilities of producing knowledge together, citizens and experts, as a transformative and radical act, in and across different cities.
What are significant stories of a fruitful relationship between activism and scholarly engagement that have been able to impact urban planning and policymaking in the long run? What are the critical issues related to this relationship? Is knowledge ‘coproduction’ just another buzzword, or are there possibilities for resisting and disrupting the status quo? What is the role of prefigurative politics in the debate surrounding efforts to challenge the injustices created by capitalist and neoliberal dynamics in cities? How have these dynamics impacted the historical evolution of cities? Is activist knowledge key to constructing postgrowth cities? To what extent have these topics been addressed from the perspective of urban history?
With these questions in mind, this session seeks contributions aimed at exploring paradigmatic cases that not only focus on local dynamics in cities from a historical perspective but also connect experiences on a transnational scale, identifying common trajectories and networks beyond the dominant sphere of the northern/western regions of the world, while looking at alliances from a decolonial perspective. This session welcomes contributions that can tell the story of various forms of relations between activism, social mobilization, commoning processes, and engaged research, and that will reflect critically on their impact on policies, plans, and urban projects, examining power dynamics and issues of inclusion and exclusion of subaltern classes, both at the local and transnational scale.
Methodologically, we are interested in exploring the criticalities, pitfalls, and open possibilities of approaches such as participatory action research, public history, public environmental humanities, etc., while reconstructing their historical trajectories in 20th-century cities.
A list of possible themes (but the session is not limited to them): History of creation and care of informal urban parks and public spaces; Transgenerational and transcultural exchange of knowledge in urban gardening; Insurgent museographies and archives; History of popular epidemiology and industrial contamination; Street-level pedagogical experimentation and neighborhood planning processes from the historical perspective; Alternative plans for public transportation, slow mobility, waste management and their role in shaping the historical evolution of cities.
Session 90
Round Table
Writing City Monographs in the 21st Century: Challenges in a Multifaceted World
Organizers
- Christoph Strupp
Forschungsstelle für Zeitgeschichte in Hamburg (Research Centre for Contemporary History in Hamburg) - Erika Szívós
Institute of Historical Studies, Department of Economic and Social History, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
Keywords
historiography; comprehensive city histories; urban actors; interdisciplinarity
Synthesis
The roundtable provides a forum for exchange on thematic, methodological and practical challenges of writing comprehensive histories of individual cities with a primary focus on the 19th and 20th centuries.
Presentation
Urban history takes different forms in academic practice. It is in cities that state action takes concrete form, where social conflicts become particularly visible, and where new social and cultural trends often have their origins, so that thematically focused urban history studies, especially in a comparative perspective, can be used to investigate and substantiate overarching social phenomena. In addition, historiography on the history of individual cities continues to assert itself, not least because there is a market and a readership outside of academia for larger overall accounts. The academic and non-academic demands for such comprehensive presentations of urban history have increased significantly in recent decades. They should reflect the complexity of contemporary political, social and cultural life in a city with a multitude of urban actors. They should also help readers to understand the often fragmented and disrupted worlds of modern cities. A city history that focuses on the town hall and the chamber of commerce is outdated. Instead, central aspects of current social debates – from questions of democratic participation and social inequality in the city to migrant communities and urban environmental and climate issues – should be given appropriate consideration. The integration of the city into regional, national and supranational networks and structures is also becoming increasingly important. Interdisciplinary approaches and the cooperation of scholars from various disciplines are likely to put 21 st -century city monographs – single-authored and multi-authored enterprises alike – on a broader footing and harbour the potential of transforming the genre altogether. Meanwhile, cross-disciplinary cooperation might also represent new challenges. These thematic extensions also place new demands on the range of sources to be analysed, from classical written documents to audiovisual sources and interviews with contemporary witnesses. There are also new ways of organising research, such as citizen science and alternative forms of publication beyond the book format, such as exhibitions, websites, or apps, which offer new opportunities for dissemination. Should contemporary urban history also actively claim political and social relevance, i.e. consciously offer historical arguments for civil society involvement in contemporary urban conflicts?
The session will be organised as a roundtable. The aim is to provide a forum for exchange on these issues, using specific examples from academic practice and inviting practitioners of urban history involved in the creation of such works. We are interested in ongoing, recently completed or concretely planned comprehensive studies with a scholarly approach to cities that focus primarily on the 19th and 20th centuries. How have the above-mentioned challenges been met in terms of content and methodology? And to what extent can the solutions be made fruitful for questions of urban history at other levels?
Session 91
Main Session
Public history at city history museums
Organizers
- Heiko Droste
Institute of Urban History, Department of History, Stockholm University - Lisa Kosok
Historical Museum of Hamburg, HafenCity University Hamburg, Germany
Keywords
public history, city history museums, history use, city branding
Synthesis
Public history denotes a broad range of methods to make use of history in and for the public. The city museums perceive public history as a means to address the public in order to frame the contemporary city in its historical formation. The session intends to discuss the role of public history in times of ever more politicized history work.
Presentation
Public history denotes a broad range of methods to make use of history in and for the public. This use of history is, ideally, based on academic research. However, it is transformed into historical representations what work outside of an academic context, aiming explicitly at a non-academic audience. Still, public history is taught at many history departments since the 1970s. When it comes to the field of urban history, public history is often performed by city history museums as well as other urban heritage institutions.
The city museums perceive public history regularly as a means to address the public in order to frame the contemporary city in its historical formation. City museums are, thus, key-players in an urban history culture with objectives ranging from educational programs, primarily for schools, partaking in a city branding agenda, creating touristic value, and not least presenting thematic exhibitions on core aspects of the historical as well as the contemporary city.
Recent changes in Western democracies, however, have once again highlighted the political nature of all kinds of public history use. It is, therefore, time to re-evaluate the role of public history as part of an ever more openly politicized history culture. The session wants to present the state of the art of public history as part of historical museums in an urban context. We welcome examples for public presentations of history programmes, practitioners’ experiences with developing public history programmes as well as their implementation in an urban context, and finally theoretical contributions on the modes of transformation of history for public uses.
Literature:
Informationen zur modernen Stadtgeschichte, 1/2016, Städtisches Erbe – Urban Heritage.
Valentin Groebner, Retroland. Geschichtstourismus und die Sehnsucht nach dem Authentischen. Frankfurt am Main, 2018.
Irmgard Zündorf, Contemporary History and Public History, Docupedia-Zeitgeschichte
(16 March 2017), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14765/zzf.dok.2.1017.v2 (last accessed 1 May 2018).
Session 92
Round Table
New challenges in reading the city through city museums
Organizers
- Xavier de la Selle
Gadagne-Lyon City History Museum - Joana Sousa Monteiro
Museum of Lisbon/EGEAC
Keywords
city museum, urban heritage, urban narratives, citizenship
Synthesis
Recent forms of city museums have been under consistent growth and development, matching the increasing complexity of cities across Europe and beyond. This round table aims at exploring the paradox that city museums face, between research and communication of urban history, and the engagement in challenges of the contemporary changing city.
Presentation
The so called “second generation of city museums” (Lanz, 2013) have been under consistent growth and development, matching the increasing complexity of cities across Europe and beyond. Since the last decades of the 20th century and more intensely since the 2010’s, the way museums are telling stories and engaging with citizens is changing, aligned with new trends and higher standards in museums, as well as new urban challenges.
By means of engaging programmes, participatory projects and responsive activities, museums can encourage urban communities to become more sustainable, equitable and open to dialogue, from the micro-scale of the neighbourhood to the larger level of the city, with direct effects on individuals and the planet. City museums have been expected to renew their narratives based on heritage and social-based research, resulting in the building of new meanings from the relation between collections, stories and their interconnection with the urban landscapes.
City museums can serve as tools for citizens to better “read” the city, contributing to growth, a sense of belonging and understanding among the communities the museums serve. Deliver scientific knowledge and engage with diverse urban communities can be of utter importance when facing fractured social contexts and the polarisation of public debate.
This session aims at exploring the paradox that city museums face: to research, deliver and communicate urban history, while targeting the challenges of the contemporary ever-changing city.
Contributions are encouraged to address critical questions such as:
– How can old paradigms of history / archaeology / arts museums evolve into contemporary engaging city museums?
– What tools can be developed to make meaningful connections between urban history, museum collections and the present life in polarised communities?
– How can city museums contribute to promote equity and fight discrimination without loosing their mission focus?
We welcome interdisciplinary, comparative, and transnational approaches that shed light on the topics and questions raised above.
LANZ, F. (2013). « City Museums in Transition: A European Overview ». Lanz, Peressut, Postiglione, European Museums in the 21st Century: Setting the Framework. MelaBooks, Politecnico di Milano
Session 93
Round Table
City museums and decolonising networks
Organizers
- Paul Spies
Stadtmuseum Berlin - Paulo Fernandes
Head of research, Lisbon Museum - Imara Limon
Amsterdam Museum
Keywords
city museums, decolonising, activist networks
Synthesis
In recent years, city museums play a role in the study and presentation of colonial history. Three of them, from Amsterdam, Lisbon and Berlin, will present their contributions on this theme, some of which are set up with decolonising networks with activist backgrounds. The session will focus on lessons learned from these collaborations.
Presentation
In recent years, research into colonial history has been initiated in many European cities. City museums play a role in this, be it by providing support to that research, or by offering programmatic components to the public. Three of these city museums, those of Amsterdam, Lisbon and Berlin, will present in the session their contributions on this theme. In many cases, these products are set up with decolonising networks made up of specialist experts, most of whom come from activist backgrounds. The session will focus on lessons learned from the collaborations between museums and these activists.
Studying the colonial past is a considerable challenge for European city museums. To begin with, there is usually little specialist knowledge on the subject in the various organisations. Even the collection often contains little about colonialism, apart from some objects with often racist content. In many cases, a historical self-analysis of one’s own institution should also be carried out, as many city museums were founded at a time when colonialism was rampant. Moreover, very little has changed organisationally since then: for instance, few city museums have a diversity within the staff representative of the city population. To these critical observations, the incumbent leadership and staff can react somewhat surprised and some resist the implicit criticism of the existing situation.
Knowledge of the colonial past and its post-colonial consequences is not infrequently better served by specialist scholars who often act as independent activists. Working with these individuals provides the museum with all kinds of new perspectives that are not seldomly confrontational. Thus, collection formation and many of the collection pieces present are looked at in a completely different way than traditionally happens in museums. Apart from the fact that objects illustrating colonial history are mostly missing, there is still little understanding of the problem side of the objects that are there: most of them have been collected from a hegemonic perspective and are not infrequently racist in content. For most decolonising activists, displaying racist objects in a public institution is an absolute no-go. This contradiction extremely fuels the discussion on museum collections. There is little point in museums adopting a defensive stance here; it is better to look for solutions that tell and display the story of colonialism in a fair and dignified manner. This requires – apart from a critical attitude towards the existing collection – new presentation methods, such as reconstructions based on scientific historical data, which make it possible to shed light on different perspectives on the story throughout time.
Session 94
Main Session
Heritagisation of urban landscapes
Organizers
- Gábor Sonkoly
Ecole des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales de Paris - Rosa Tamborrino
Politecnico di Torino - Joan Ganau
University of Lleida
Keywords
lobal urban history, historic urban landscape, urban governance, urban heritage
Synthesis
The session aims is to understand how the concept of (historic) urban landscape is used in global and local discourses to overcome the division of culture/nature in urban settings and to pin down the spatial specificities of a historic city. Its key questions are about the practices and reinterpretations of heritage cities as urban landscapes.
Presentation
Urban landscape has been a category of reference in several European and non-European cities to overcome the division of culture/nature in urban settings and to pin down the spatial specificities of a given city/town. In the last decades, historic urban landscape has become one of the principal concepts to interpret and to analyse the complexity of urban heritage. The concept of urban landscape has two major analytical roles and both are worthy of historical scholarship. On the one hand, it can serve to understand the corrent complex heritagisation of cities (including even very recent developments) and, on the other hand, it is also useful to trace back the interpretation of cities as views, as ecosystems, as palimpsest, etc., which goes beyond the previous distinction between historic centres and more recent developments, and these signs could reinterpret the history of heritage cities. Urban landscape as a category has also been studied in urban studies, urban planning and urban geography. It has been examined in certain cases of urban environmental history, but there is still space for comparative studies.
The session invites contributions about both approaches. Its key question is to compare the global discourses about urban landscape with local ones, which see the utility of this concept in the historical (re)interpretation of cities. Since urban landscape as a heritage concept became undoubtedly global, this comparison could be constructive between European and non-European cities. While certain European cities were pioneering in the definition of their heritage along the notion of urban landscape, non-European cities, –primarily in Asia, Latin America and Oceania– often more enthusiastically adapted the historic urban landscape concept to demonstrate their heritage accordingly.
The session’s key issues are the following:
1) When and how is a city/town/quarter interpreted as an urban landscape? What are the reasons to replace other spatial categories (centre, site, quarter, zone, etc.) by the concept of urban landscape? What is the historical context of such a choice? Who are the main social actors of such a decision?
2) How is the concept of urban landscape used to grasp a city/quarter as an ecological unit?
3) How is the concept of urban landscape applied to strengthen participative approaches to urban governance?
4) How does the global discourse about historic urban landscape contribute to the reinterpretation of urban heritage in heritage cities?
5) What is the impact of the (re)interpretation of cities as urban landscape on the history writing of these cities?
6) How to deal with the anthropogenic risk for cities affected by a great interest in their recognized urban landscape?
7) How to deal with historic urban landscape endangered by natural disaster or by social crisis?
Session 95
Main Session
Colonial legacies in public space: commemoralisation, conflict and artistic interventions
Organizers
- Annemarie de Wildt
Stadscuratorium Amsterdam - Tim Cole
University of Bristol – Social History Department - Markus Balkenhol
Meertens Institute, Research institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences - Jakob Ingemann Parby
City Museum Kopenhagen
Keywords
statues, monuments, decoloniality, artistic interventions, public space
Synthesis
This session explores how cities confront colonial legacies in public space through removal, reinterpretation, and artistic intervention. It invites interdisciplinary perspectives on memory, identity, and decolonial strategies in urban space, fostering transnational dialogue on contested commemorations.
Presentation
Cities around the world are confronting the contested legacies of statues and memorials tied to colonial history. Once seen as tributes to civic or royal duty, these monuments have become flashpoints of protest and debate in recent decades. Examples range from Edward Colston’s statue in Bristol to Jan Pieterszoon Coen in the Netherlands, King Leopold II in Belgium, and Cecil Rhodes in South Africa. These monuments are no longer passive commemorations—they are active sites of conflict, reflection, and transformation.
The leading question is how urban spaces shape memory and identity, and how communities, artists, and policymakers are reckoning with colonial histories materialized in public monuments. The session welcomes case studies of local conflicts and responses, contributing to a broader transnational understanding.
Responses to contested monuments vary widely: some are removed or toppled, others reinterpreted or relocated. Cities may add plaques, move statues to museums, or support artistic interventions that reframe their meaning. Such actions form part of decolonial strategies to tell more inclusive stories. Initiatives like Mapping Slavery visualize the material and immaterial traces of slavery and colonialism, offering counternarratives to traditional commemorations. Meanwhile, heritage planners attempt to reconcile calls for justice with the desire to preserve history.
Key questions include: What roles do colonial monuments play in shaping national or urban identity? How do removal or reinterpretation change their meaning? What tensions exist between heritage and decolonial demands? And how do cities negotiate between historical acknowledgment and inclusive futures?
This session takes an interdisciplinary approach to an urgent topic. Statues have become dynamic actors in debates over empire, race, and memory. Rising scholarship in memory politics, urban space, and postcolonial heritage—alongside public activism and artistic engagement—demands new frameworks for dealing with colonial traces in cityscapes. We aim to foster discussion on how these processes can reshape community identity and historical narratives. We invite contributions from urban history, art history, memory/heritage studies, anthropology, and postcolonial studies. Case studies beyond Europe are especially encouraged to promote comparative insights.
This session is initiated by the research network The Everyday Life of Urban Monuments, which explores the civic and ideological roots of commemorative practices. The network, promotes interdisciplinary collaboration across art history, ethnography, urban history, heritage studies, and museology.
themes:
Iconoclasm and monument removal
Artistic/performative interventions
Municipal and heritage policy responses
Memory activism and public history
Comparative monument debates
Recontextualization in museums or new sites
Community engagement and counter-memorials
Session 96
Round Table
Heritage conflicts and urban identity
Organizers
- Francesc Muñoz
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Alessandro Scarnato
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya – ETSAB
Keywords
heritage, identity, tourism, conflict, culture
Synthesis
Heritage has a great potential regarding the construction of a shared identity, above all in an international perspective. Nevertheless, it also constitutes a sort of battlefield for controversies generated by the clash of narratives, in social, technical and cultural sense. Massive tourism, globalisation, wars and architectural debate can set a difficult scenario for the stakeholders. The proposed round table aims to gather relevant representants of the up-to-date expertise in the field in order to nurture an interdisciplinary discussion.
Presentation
The cultural dimension of urban space is normally associated with the presence of urban heritage of all types: historical, cultural, tangible and intangible. In fact, the existence of recognized heritage elements in urban space is still one of the key factors that articulate concepts such as urban identity and the very idea of the differentiation or hierarchy of the places in the city with which individuals relate and identify.
In this sense, the seminal concept of culture or urban identity is well associated with one of the guidelines that best define the urban lifestyle: the consumption of heritage in its different aspects.
Such continuous consumption of heritage is very well explained by the fact that we live in a historical moment in which we value the past more than ever, to the point that current urban societies have been defined on the base of the unprecedented success of the so-called ‘vintage culture’ or, to put it more academically, based on what the cultural geographer David Lowenthal defined in 1985 in his book The Past is a Foreign Country, when he stated that Past had become a ‘commodity’, that is, an object of consumption and, consequently, it had escaped its previous seclusion in museums to flood into urban space and time, following its capacity to offer any types of goods and products in the correspondent market.
We live, therefore, in urban patrimonialist, patrimonialized and, above all, patrimonializing societies, in which the conversion of more and more vestiges of the past, even a very recent past, into heritage demonstrates the importance of this reading of urban space.
In this complex process of patrimonialization of the city, which includes both architecture and public spaces, one can find very diverse elements characterizing modern urban industrial culture: productive spaces (factories or warehouses) or infrastructural elements; economic attributes, such as the division of labor and specialization or standardization in terms of forms of production and consumption; social factors, such as mechanization, speed or individualism and anonymity that characterize metropolitan lifestyle; and others of a cultural nature, such as ephemeral interactions and the continuous multiplicity of all types of stimuli that define the daily use of urban space; the different measurement and conception of time and, above all, the notion of metropolitan space as a ‘cosmopolitan’ territory.
This success of heritage as a reference for urban culture and identity coexists, however, with the effects of a rampant globalization that, as recent international events show, are nevertheless still far from achieving a true scenario of peaceful interculturality.
Heritage can, therefore, be conceived from an innovative reading as a trigger or catalyst for new truly intercultural social scenarios, where cultural interaction characterizes the authentic substance of the urban event in the 21st century.
Session 97
Main Session
Mapping Urban Complexity: Unveiling Invisible Narratives
Organizers
- Núria Benach
Universitat de Barcelona - Philippe Rekacewicz
University of Wageningen (The Netherlands) - Núria Font-Casaseca
Universitat de Girona
Keywords
urban complexity; radical cartography; alternative mapping; space-time
Synthesis
This session invites creative cartographic explorations that embrace the complexity of urban histories. We welcome contributions that experiment with radical mapping methodologies—whether through digital technologies, artistic interpretations, or interdisciplinary approaches—to uncover hidden narratives, layered temporalities, and long-overlooked urban histories.
Presentation
Urban historical maps have often portrayed the city as a static object, frozen in time. In contrast, the city can be approached as an unstable object, in motion, always under construction, resisting representation in its complexity through traditional cartographic conventions. Moreover, the specific nature of recent urban developments compels us to rethink the very concept of what “urban extensions” are today, and more generally, how we define “urbanization”.
Recent proposals have increasingly called for more attentive engagement with multiplicity, spatialities, and subaltern or suppressed urban narratives. How, then, can we map urban complexity given the limitations of conventional cartographic rules? The inadequacy of maps relates to a particular vision of space that needs to be challenged if we want to provide a richer and more complex image of urban processes, and to make visible what has previously been invisible (Rekacewicz 2021).
Examples of urban development or “”reorganization”” are numerous, but a few emblematic cases can be highlighted. In the occupied West Bank, the Israeli governments, in an effort to assert territorial colonization, have devised and implemented a highly complex network for the circulation of people and goods. The modes of urban development in megacities such as Kolkata, Los Angeles, or Tokyo also give rise to practices and flows of people and goods that present significant challenges to cartographers and geographers. At a smaller scale, when attempting to place the global urban phenomenon into context, the challenge then shifts towards efforts to make visible what conventional cartography has long ignored.
Alternative ways of mapping often need to break cartographical classical conventions, including new methodologies and new visual approaches. The goal of the session is to go beyond the limits of these cartographic rules so that maps reflect a conception of space that understands it as the result of multiple past histories and relationships with spaces beyond the city itself, to restore its spatio-temporal dimension (Massey 2005).
We aim to encourage interdisciplinary dialogue between scholars, digital humanists, and mapmakers working at the intersection of urban history and critical cartography. We particularly welcome papers that actively engage with radical cartographies and experimental visualizations that seek new forms of representation.
Possible topics for this session:
• Urban networks and their historical connections across space.
• The generation and evolution of hinterlands over time.
• The formation and evolution of urban peripheries
• Other visual or cartographic approaches (experimental, emotional or radical) that reveal hidden, layered, or relational aspects of urban history.
Session 98
Main Session
Methodological Challenges and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Maritime History and Port City Studies
Organizers
- Jordi Ibarz
Universitat de Barcelona - Agustín Nieto
Universidad Nacional Mar del Plata - Ricard García Orallo
Universitat de Barcelona
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, maritime networks; port cities; Digital Humanities
Synthesis
This panel explores the methodological challenges and potential of using AI in maritime and port city history, to reassess urban and trade networks through computational approaches.
Presentation
Can AI help reconstruct the networks of coastal and commercial cities? What methodological challenges arise from using AI in a field with fragmented and heterogeneous sources? At its core, the panel asks: can AI offer new insights into maritime communication and trade networks?
This topic is historiographically relevant, as the history of cities is deeply tied to commercial and transport systems that connected them across regions. Although European historiography often centres on states and nations, port cities have long played key roles in shaping economic and cultural life beyond political borders.
The increasing digitization of historical sources—nautical charts, censuses, trade records, photographs, and especially newspapers—opens new possibilities for using AI in the analysis of maritime networks. At the same time, it raises critical issues: data biases, fragmented records, and challenges in interpreting algorithmic outputs in historical context.
The session will discuss both opportunities and limitations of using AI in urban history, with a focus on maritime trade. Four key themes will structure the conversation:
1. Transformation of Maritime Trade Networks:
How have port networks evolved, and what has been their role in connecting continents and regions?
2. Application of AI in Historical Source Analysis:
How can processing large datasets (maps, censuses, trade logs, newspapers) help reconstruct maritime urban dynamics?
3. Methodological Challenges:
How do we address source fragmentation, algorithmic bias, and the contextual interpretation of data in historical analysis?
4. Comparative Study of Global Port Networks:
Case studies that move beyond Europe, with attention to Africa, Asia, and Latin America and their transatlantic and Mediterranean connections.
Session Objectives:
• Explore how AI can reshape our understanding of maritime trade networks.
• Discuss methodological issues and risks, such as source decontextualization.
• Encourage interdisciplinary debate on the use of AI in maritime urban history.
• Promote comparative studies of port cities across global regions.
AI offers new ways to study port networks globally, intersecting urban history, social sciences, and digital technologies. Yet, it also requires careful reflection on its limits and biases, to ensure historically grounded interpretations in a rapidly evolving field.
Session 99
Event
Digital cartography for the Historic Charter of Barcelona
Organizers
- Oriol Hostench Ruiz
Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya – Barcelona Tech - Pablo Martínez Díez
300.000kms
Keywords
Digital cartography, big data, urban research, historic map, barcelona
Synthesis
The development of the Historic Charter of Barcelona, is an ongoing project held by the MUHBA in which many historians, architects and researchers have collaborated. The use of big data from different sources, historical maps and studies on this area made possible the drawing of 30 different stages in the history of Barcelona.
Event, no papers admitted
Presentation
Some years ago MUHBA started a cartographic project to transcript the history of the city of Barcelona, with different goals. The first and most immediate was to get some new cartographies to incorporate them into all the museums of the city.
The compendium of final plans was drawn from archaeological surveys, historical studies, period engravings, military plans and more recent cartography. It is because of this wide range of sources and fields of knowledge that an advisory board of experts had to be involved, supervised by technicians from the History Museum of Barcelona.
The procedure used to draw the cartographies was based primarily on the georeferencing of historical plans, so that they overlapped exactly with the current city, and to correct cartographic errors or deviations. This task was carried out by taking more than 500 control points for each plan, with the aim of achieving a reprojection with the maximum guarantees of superposition. Once these georeferenced bases were available, a meticulous historical research was carried out in order to correct, expand or retouch those buildings or areas that were erroneous from a historical point of view, always opting for the most accepted option in the scientific field of the urban history of Barcelona. In addition, the most unique heritage elements of each historical period were identified.
The second task entrusted by the Museum was to create the interactive website where all these plans produced in two years of uninterrupted work are displayed. It is an interactive consultation website aimed at historians and specialists in the cartography of Barcelona, as well as lovers of the city who want to know its origins better. But it is also a teaching resource for all publicists, municipal technicians and teachers who want to explain their historical approach to the city with the most current tools.
This publication system assumes the need for constant improvement and refinement of the cartographic transcription carried out, due to the magnitude of its ambition and the permanent evolution of the historical knowledge of our city. Therefore, a cartographic server has been designed that allows the instant publication of the modifications that will be added. This tool also allows you to visualize different layers of knowledge for each map, depending on the period, and incorporates the option of comparing the historical map with the existing city, through a superposition of the built mass.
The work that we present is open to citizens, and is constantly and permanently updated based on new findings that are produced and studies approved by the scientific community. The Historical Map of Barcelona works with and aspires to converge with information from other public bodies, such as the Municipal Institute of Informatics, and above all with the Catalogue of Architectural Heritage of Barcelona and the Archaeological Map of Barcelona.
Session 100
Event
Cambridge Urban History of Europe
Organizers
- Maarten Prak
Utrecht University - Dorothee Brantz
Technische Universität Berlin - Patrick Lantschner
University College London - Gábor Sonkoly
Institut d’Études Avancées, Paris
Keywords
urban history, Europe, textbook
Synthesis
Presentation of the three volumes of the Cambridge Urban of Europe to the community of urban historians of Europe.
Event, no papers admitted
Presentation
In November/December 2025 the Cambridge Urban History of Europe will be published in Europe (rest of the world in early 2026). This marks the completion of a project launched in 2019. The three volumes of the Cambridge Urban History of Europe will comprise c. 100 chapters, written by c. 120 authors, ranging from the earliest urban settlements to today.
Originally, we planned to combine the Antwerp conference in 2021 with author meetings. When the conference had to be postponed, due to the pandemic, we presented our plans in the 2022 conference in one of the sessions. By the time of the 2024 Ostrava conference, where we had hoped to present the books, we were able to have short presentations of a selection of chapters from volumes 2 and 3.
By the time the community of urban historians of Europe meets again in Barcelona, however, we will have the books. To mark the publication of this milestone in European urban history, I propose, in my capacity of general editor of the series, to organize a roundtable session where three of four experts will critically evaluate the project from a number of different angles. Who they are and what those angles will be, is too early to say.
Ideally, the results of this session will be published in Urban History, so I would like to select the speakers in consultation with the editors of the journal. Also ideally, the conference organisers acknowledge the importance of this publication by scheduling this as a plenary roundtable.